Head-to-head Updated

Vredestein Quatrac 3 vs Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD08R — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 2 road tests and 58 + 46 owner reviews. How we score

Quatrac 3 leads, 71–68 Narrow edge

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 68

    Dry

    ADVAN Neova AD08R +7
    75
    Why this score
    SourceQuatrac 3ADVAN Neova AD08R
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests≈ 68 (est.)70
    Reviews found online6983

    Quatrac 3: 60% × 68.1 (est.) + 40% × 68.6 = 68

    ADVAN Neova AD08R: 60% × 70.3 + 40% × 83.1 = 75

    No road tests of dry for Quatrac 3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 75

    Wet

    Quatrac 3 +6
    69
    Why this score
    SourceQuatrac 3ADVAN Neova AD08R
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests≈ 74 (est.)67
    Reviews found online7871

    Quatrac 3: 60% × 74.1 (est.) + 40% × 77.5 = 75

    ADVAN Neova AD08R: 60% × 67.1 + 40% × 71.3 = 69

    No road tests of wet for Quatrac 3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 76

    Snow

    Quatrac 3 +25
    51
    Why this score
    SourceQuatrac 3ADVAN Neova AD08R
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 73 (est.)≈ 59 (est.)
    Reviews found online8038

    Quatrac 3: 60% × 73.3 (est.) + 40% × 80.1 = 76

    ADVAN Neova AD08R: 60% × 59.5 (est.) + 40% × 38.4 = 51

    No road tests of snow for Quatrac 3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

    No road tests of snow for ADVAN Neova AD08R. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

  4. 69

    Comfort

    Quatrac 3 +1
    68
    Why this score
    SourceQuatrac 3ADVAN Neova AD08R
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online6966

    Quatrac 3: 60% × 69.1 (est.) + 40% × 69 = 69

    ADVAN Neova AD08R: 60% × 68.6 (est.) + 40% × 65.9 = 68

    No road tests of comfort for Quatrac 3 or ADVAN Neova AD08R. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. –

    Noise

    No comparison
    68
    Why this score
    SourceQuatrac 3ADVAN Neova AD08R
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online–68

    ADVAN Neova AD08R: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 68.3 = 68

    No road tests of noise for ADVAN Neova AD08R. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 66

    Treadwear

    Quatrac 3 +2
    64
    Why this score
    SourceQuatrac 3ADVAN Neova AD08R
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 65 (est.)
    Reviews found online6663

    Quatrac 3: 60% × 65.7 (est.) + 40% × 65.8 = 66

    ADVAN Neova AD08R: 60% × 64.8 (est.) + 40% × 63.1 = 64

    No road tests of treadwear for Quatrac 3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

    No road tests of treadwear for ADVAN Neova AD08R. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 71

    Handling (owners)

    ADVAN Neova AD08R +10
    81
    Why this score
    SourceQuatrac 3ADVAN Neova AD08R
    Reviews found online7181
Scores at a glance
Vredestein Quatrac 3 vs Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD08R: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryVredestein Quatrac 3Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD08R
Relative Score 71 68
Dry 68 75
Wet 75 69
Snow 76 51
Comfort 69 68
Noise – 68
Treadwear 66 64
Handling (owners) 71 81

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Quatrac 3

ADVAN Neova AD08R

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

DisciplineCategoryQuatrac 3ADVAN Neova AD08RΔHead-to-head
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Overall Ranking Overall #35/54 2013 54 Tyre Braking Test #2/5 2019 17 inch Track Day Tyre Test – Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Quatrac 3

Pros

  • Exceptional grip and confidence in snow, ice, and slush
  • Strong wet-weather performance and hydroplaning resistance
  • Predictable and progressive handling limits

Cons

  • Develops significant road noise or rhythmic droning as tread wears down
  • Accelerated tread wear reported by some users, particularly on heavier vehicles
  • Slightly reduced dry-pavement grip and sharper cornering response compared to dedicated summer tires
All owner themes in the Quatrac 3 review

Tire B ADVAN Neova AD08R

Pros

  • Unbeatable dry grip and track performance
  • Razor-sharp steering response and exceptional road feedback
  • Stiff sidewalls providing precise turn-in and cornering stability

Cons

  • High tire noise that can worsen significantly as the tire ages
  • Stiff ride quality and compromised overall comfort
  • Prone to aquaplaning and reduced traction in standing water or heavy rain
All owner themes in the ADVAN Neova AD08R review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Vredestein Quatrac 3 B · Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD08R
CategoryAll SeasonSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Tread depth—9/32″
UTQG—200 A A
Sidewall—Blackwall
Max pressure—51 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

Vredestein Quatrac 3

Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD08R

Narrow edge: Vredestein Quatrac 3 — better snow and wet. Pick the Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD08R if handling and dry matter most to you.

Pick tire A You drive through snowy winters

Vredestein Quatrac 3 scores 76 vs 51 on snow.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD08R scores 81 vs 71 on handling.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD08R scores 75 vs 68 on dry.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Vredestein Quatrac 3 scores 75 vs 69 on wet.

Tire A · Vredestein Quatrac 3
Tire B · Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD08R

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Quatrac 3 or ADVAN Neova AD08R?

Which is better in the wet, Quatrac 3 or ADVAN Neova AD08R?

Vredestein Quatrac 3, 75 vs 69 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Quatrac 3 or ADVAN Neova AD08R?

Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD08R, 75 vs 68 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, Quatrac 3 or ADVAN Neova AD08R?

Vredestein Quatrac 3, 76 vs 51 on our snow score.

Which is more comfortable, Quatrac 3 or ADVAN Neova AD08R?

Neither, by our numbers: 69 vs 68 on the comfort score, within 3 points.

Which lasts longer, Quatrac 3 or ADVAN Neova AD08R?

Neither, by our numbers: 66 vs 64 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology