Tests 69 · 2 tests Owners 69 · 47 reviews
Head-to-head
Updated
Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD08R vs Bridgestone Potenza RE 71RS — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 2 + 3 road tests and 47 + 453 owner reviews. How we score
Potenza RE 71RS leads, 74–72 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 79 · 3 tests Owners 70 · 453 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 11 in 2022 Tire Rack Extreme Performance Track Tyre Test (dry handling)
“Drove my GR86 coast to coast on pre-thrashed 200tw tires in 3.5 days AMA 2024 GR86 Premium performance package mt Bridgestone Potenza RE-71rs tires Car had 24,000ish miles and now has 27,000ish”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
76
Dry
Potenza RE 71RS +884Why this score
Source ADVAN Neova AD08R Potenza RE 71RS Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / 3 tests 70 78 Reviews found online 85 92 ADVAN Neova AD08R: 60% × 70.3 + 40% × 85.2 = 76
Potenza RE 71RS: 60% × 78.2 + 40% × 91.6 = 84
-
70
Wet
Potenza RE 71RS +777Why this score
Source ADVAN Neova AD08R Potenza RE 71RS Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / 2 tests 67 85 Reviews found online 73 67 ADVAN Neova AD08R: 60% × 67.2 + 40% × 73.1 = 70
Potenza RE 71RS: 60% × 84.6 + 40% × 66.7 = 77
-
52
Snow
No comparison–Why this score
Source ADVAN Neova AD08R Potenza RE 71RS Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 61 (est.) – Reviews found online 39 – ADVAN Neova AD08R: 60% × 60.7 (est.) + 40% × 39.2 = 52
No road tests of snow for ADVAN Neova AD08R. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
67
Comfort
ADVAN Neova AD08R +760Why this score
Source ADVAN Neova AD08R Potenza RE 71RS Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 68 (est.) 71 Reviews found online 67 52 ADVAN Neova AD08R: 40% × 68.3 (est.) + 60% × 66.5 = 67
Potenza RE 71RS: 40% × 71 + 60% × 52.3 = 60
No road tests of comfort for ADVAN Neova AD08R. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
67
Noise
ADVAN Neova AD08R +265Why this score
Source ADVAN Neova AD08R Potenza RE 71RS Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 66 (est.) 67 Reviews found online 68 63 ADVAN Neova AD08R: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 68.4 = 67
Potenza RE 71RS: 60% × 66.5 + 40% × 63.3 = 65
No road tests of noise for ADVAN Neova AD08R. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
65
Treadwear
ADVAN Neova AD08R +758Why this score
Source ADVAN Neova AD08R Potenza RE 71RS Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 65 (est.) ≈ 61 (est.) Reviews found online 64 52 ADVAN Neova AD08R: 60% × 65.5 (est.) + 40% × 63.6 = 65
Potenza RE 71RS: 60% × 61.4 (est.) + 40% × 52.2 = 58
No road tests of treadwear for ADVAN Neova AD08R. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for Potenza RE 71RS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
84
Handling (owners)
Potenza RE 71RS +286Why this score
Source ADVAN Neova AD08R Potenza RE 71RS Reviews found online 84 86
Scores at a glance
| Category | Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD08R | Bridgestone Potenza RE 71RS |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 72 | 74 |
| Dry | 76 | 84 |
| Wet | 70 | 77 |
| Snow | 52 | – |
| Comfort | 67 | 60 |
| Noise | 67 | 65 |
| Treadwear | 65 | 58 |
| Handling (owners) | 84 | 86 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
72
/ 100
ADVAN Neova AD08R
74
/ 100
Potenza RE 71RS
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | ADVAN Neova AD08R | Potenza RE 71RS | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Braking | Dry | 96% #3/5 · 2019 17 inch Track Day Tyre Test | 100% #2/7 · 2025 Tire Rack Extreme Performance Track Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Dry Handling | Dry | 99% #3/5 · 2019 17 inch Track Day Tyre Test | 100% #1/7 · 2025 Tire Rack Extreme Performance Track Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Dry Handling (tester's mark) | Dry | 70% #4/5 · 2019 17 inch Track Day Tyre Test | 100% #1/7 · 2025 Tire Rack Extreme Performance Track Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Wet Braking | Wet | 95% #2/5 · 2019 17 inch Track Day Tyre Test | 100% #1/7 · 2025 Tire Rack Extreme Performance Track Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Wet Handling | Wet | 95% #4/5 · 2017 Track Day Tyre Test | 100% #1/7 · 2025 Tire Rack Extreme Performance Track Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #2/5 2019 17 inch Track Day Tyre Test | #1/7 2025 Tire Rack Extreme Performance Track Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A ADVAN Neova AD08R
Pros
- Unbeatable dry grip and track performance
- Razor-sharp steering response and exceptional road feedback
- Stiff sidewalls providing precise turn-in and cornering stability
Cons
- High tire noise that can worsen significantly as the tire ages
- Stiff ride quality and compromised overall comfort
- Prone to aquaplaning and reduced traction in standing water or heavy rain
Tire B Potenza RE 71RS
Pros
- Outstanding dry grip and rapid warm-up characteristics.
- Highly predictable and communicative at the limit, allowing for easy recovery.
- Improved on-road refinement, noise levels, and comfort compared to its predecessor.
Cons
- Rapid tread wear, especially when used aggressively on track or heavy vehicles.
- Tendency to become 'greasy' or lose peak grip during extended track sessions.
- Stiff sidewalls can make mounting the tires onto rims difficult.
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Tire A
Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD08R
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Tire B
Positive
Bridgestone Potenza RE 71RS
Community sentiment toward the Bridgestone Potenza RE-71RS is overwhelmingly positive, with drivers praising its high grip levels, responsive turn-in, and improved refinement over the older RE-71R. Discussions frequently center around track and autocross setups, optimal hot tire pressures, clearance pricing, and its streetability regarding road noise and gravel pickup. Minor caveats noted include fast wear characteristic of 200tw competition tires and rotation limits stemming from an asymmetrical tread design.
civicx.com
·2025-02-25
“They are an amazing tire, both for autocross and track days. I'm currently running Falkens but my next track set will be RE71s for sure. Should be able to get a half second off my laps from what I've seen so far.”
s2ki.com
“When I said 'they are more different than I expected,' the best way to describe that with one word is SMOOTH! These tires are smooth in all aspects. They are substantially quieter than the old 71R, maybe a 2 out of 10. After driving on two lane blacktops, I have not noticed any measurable gravel or other debris picked up at this point, definitely less than the 71R, maybe 50% reduction. Handling is the most important aspect for me personally and Bridgestone has hit a home run! Stopping fantastic and according to Bridgestone they are better on wet roads, IDK as I try to avoid driving in the rain. Steering is amazing and more sensitive! There is even a level of comfort that I did not expect for performance tires. Honestly, I am unable to come up with any negative. Five Stars! The post by jst2878 was spot on about them being a 'gift!' After break in greater than 300 miles, they just need to be hammered! After doing so yesterday, I have returned home for Pina Coladas & Pool this weekend!”
r/ElantraN
·5 upvotes ·2025-09-06
“Track tire fitment Just got some new Bridgestone Potenza RE-71rs in 245/40r18. I did my research on this subreddit and it seems like that will fit without rubbing/camber bolts. Does anyone know if the RE-71rs’ run wide cause they measure a full inch wider than the stock PS4s’, I’m just wondering now if I’ll need camber bolts. I’d prefer not, just want to throw them on and go. For reference they are being mounted onto a 18x8.5 +45 Enkei TS-V wheel. If anyone could offer insight cause I just can’t understand how they would fit but maybe I’m just over thinking it. Stock suspension by the way. I searched the sub and didn’t see anything with exact matching specs, only bigger and different tires. Tl;dr Will 245/40r18 Bridgestone Potenza RE-71rs’ fit on an 18x8.5 +45 wheel without clearance issues/adding other modifications (camber bolts) on our car? Thanks for any help! Read more”
Top themes
#track and autocross performance#tire pressure tuning#road noise and refinement#clearance pricing and availability#fitment and sizing#tread wear and longevity#comparison to previous RE-71R
Based on 33 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD08R | B · Bridgestone Potenza RE 71RS |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 1 | 10 |
| Rim diameters | 19″ | 15″ – 19″ |
| Tread depth | 9/32″ | 7/32″ |
| UTQG | 200 A A | 200 A A |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | 51 psi | 51 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
72
/ 100
Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD08R
74
/ 100
Bridgestone Potenza RE 71RS
Narrow edge: Bridgestone Potenza RE 71RS — better dry and wet. Pick the Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD08R if comfort and treadwear matter most to you.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Bridgestone Potenza RE 71RS scores 84 vs 76 on dry.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD08R scores 67 vs 60 on comfort.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD08R scores 65 vs 58 on treadwear.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Bridgestone Potenza RE 71RS scores 77 vs 70 on wet.
Tire A · Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD08R
Tire B · Bridgestone Potenza RE 71RS
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
ADVAN Neova AD08R or Potenza RE 71RS?
Which is better in the wet, ADVAN Neova AD08R or Potenza RE 71RS?
Bridgestone Potenza RE 71RS, 77 vs 70 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, ADVAN Neova AD08R or Potenza RE 71RS?
Bridgestone Potenza RE 71RS, 84 vs 76 on our dry score.
Which is quieter, ADVAN Neova AD08R or Potenza RE 71RS?
Neither, by our numbers: 67 vs 65 on the noise score, within 3 points.
Which is more comfortable, ADVAN Neova AD08R or Potenza RE 71RS?
Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD08R, 67 vs 60 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, ADVAN Neova AD08R or Potenza RE 71RS?
Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD08R, 65 vs 58 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology