tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Vredestein Quatrac Pro vs Yokohama Parada Spec-X — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 14 + 0 road tests and 590 + 28 owner reviews. How we score

Quatrac Pro leads, 71–68 Narrow edge

Check price on Amazon · Quatrac Pro or Parada Spec-X on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Vredestein Quatrac Pro
Tire AVredestein

Quatrac Pro

All Season

± 5

Tests 68 · 14 tests Owners 73 · 590 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 16 in 2021 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test (wet braking)

Yokohama Parada Spec-X
Tire BYokohama

Parada Spec-X

High Performance All-Season tire

± 8

Tests – · none yet Owners 66 · 28 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 73

    Dry

    Quatrac Pro +7
    66
    Why this score
    SourceQuatrac ProParada Spec-X
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 13 / – tests73≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online7465

    Quatrac Pro: 60% × 72.7 + 40% × 74.2 = 73

    Parada Spec-X: 60% × 66.8 (est.) + 40% × 65.2 = 66

    No road tests of dry for Parada Spec-X. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 84

    Wet

    Quatrac Pro +12
    72
    Why this score
    SourceQuatrac ProParada Spec-X
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 13 / – tests85≈ 72 (est.)
    Reviews found online8172

    Quatrac Pro: 60% × 85.2 + 40% × 81 = 84

    Parada Spec-X: 60% × 71.6 (est.) + 40% × 72.4 = 72

    No road tests of wet for Parada Spec-X. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 54

    Snow

    Parada Spec-X +14
    68
    Why this score
    SourceQuatrac ProParada Spec-X
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 11 / – tests48≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online6566

    Quatrac Pro: 60% × 47.6 + 40% × 64.7 = 54

    Parada Spec-X: 60% × 69 (est.) + 40% × 65.6 = 68

    No road tests of snow for Parada Spec-X. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 75

    Comfort

    Quatrac Pro +7
    68
    Why this score
    SourceQuatrac ProParada Spec-X
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests73≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online7768

    Quatrac Pro: 40% × 72.6 + 60% × 76.9 = 75

    Parada Spec-X: 40% × 68.5 (est.) + 60% × 68.1 = 68

    No road tests of comfort for Parada Spec-X. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 72

    Noise

    Quatrac Pro +3
    69
    Why this score
    SourceQuatrac ProParada Spec-X
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 10 / – tests75≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online≈ 66 (est.)73

    Quatrac Pro: 60% × 75.2 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 72

    Parada Spec-X: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 72.8 = 69

    No owner ratings of noise for Quatrac Pro. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

    No road tests of noise for Parada Spec-X. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 60

    Treadwear

    Parada Spec-X +1
    61
    Why this score
    SourceQuatrac ProParada Spec-X
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / – tests56≈ 63 (est.)
    Reviews found online6758

    Quatrac Pro: 60% × 55.8 + 40% × 67.1 = 60

    Parada Spec-X: 60% × 63.4 (est.) + 40% × 57.8 = 61

    No road tests of treadwear for Parada Spec-X. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 73

    Handling (owners)

    Quatrac Pro +3
    70
    Why this score
    SourceQuatrac ProParada Spec-X
    Reviews found online7370
  8. 49

    Efficiency

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceQuatrac ProParada Spec-X
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 10 / – tests49–
Scores at a glance
CategoryVredestein Quatrac ProYokohama Parada Spec-X
Relative Score 71 68
Dry 73 66
Wet 84 72
Snow 54 68
Comfort 75 68
Noise 72 69
Treadwear 60 61
Handling (owners) 73 70
Efficiency 49 –

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 5

Quatrac Pro

± 8

Parada Spec-X

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Quatrac Pro

Pros

  • Exceptional wet weather performance with high resistance to aquaplaning
  • Remarkably low road noise and high ride comfort compared to OEM or run-flat tires
  • Strong and predictable grip in cold, rainy, and mild winter conditions

Cons

  • Reduced fuel economy or slight negative impact on range reported by some users
  • Mixed feedback on durability, with a few drivers experiencing faster-than-expected tread wear or manufacturing defects
  • Subpar performance in heavy snow or packed ice compared to dedicated winter tires
All owner themes in the Quatrac Pro review

Tire B Parada Spec-X

Pros

  • Significantly quieter and more comfortable than competing brands
  • Exceptional wet weather performance, handling heavy rain and standing water with confidence
  • Strong dry traction and responsive overall handling for aggressive driving

Cons

  • Accelerated tread wear observed by some drivers, particularly on heavy SUVs
  • Shorter lifespan under harsh winter conditions or aggressive driving styles
All owner themes in the Parada Spec-X review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Vredestein Quatrac Pro B · Yokohama Parada Spec-X
CategoryAll SeasonHigh Performance All-Season tire
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverSUV and 4x4
Sizes available9723
Rim diameters17″ – 22″18″ – 24″
Tread depth—11/32″
UTQG—420 A A
Sidewall—Blackwall
Max pressure—51 psi
Sizes in common77

Which one should you actually buy?

Vredestein Quatrac Pro

Yokohama Parada Spec-X

Narrow edge: Vredestein Quatrac Pro — better wet, dry and comfort. Pick the Yokohama Parada Spec-X if snow matters most to you.

Pick tire B You drive through snowy winters

Yokohama Parada Spec-X scores 68 vs 54 on snow.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Vredestein Quatrac Pro scores 84 vs 72 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Vredestein Quatrac Pro scores 73 vs 66 on dry.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Vredestein Quatrac Pro scores 75 vs 68 on comfort.

Tire A · Vredestein Quatrac Pro
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Yokohama Parada Spec-X
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Quatrac Pro or Parada Spec-X?

Which is better in the wet, Quatrac Pro or Parada Spec-X?

Vredestein Quatrac Pro, 84 vs 72 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Quatrac Pro or Parada Spec-X?

Vredestein Quatrac Pro, 73 vs 66 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, Quatrac Pro or Parada Spec-X?

Yokohama Parada Spec-X, 68 vs 54 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, Quatrac Pro or Parada Spec-X?

Vredestein Quatrac Pro, 72 vs 69 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, Quatrac Pro or Parada Spec-X?

Vredestein Quatrac Pro, 75 vs 68 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Quatrac Pro or Parada Spec-X?

Neither, by our numbers: 60 vs 61 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology