Head-to-head Updated

Vredestein Sportrac 5 vs Michelin CrossClimate+ — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 2 + 13 road tests and 336 + 120 owner reviews. How we score

CrossClimate+ is ahead, 81–74

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Vredestein Sportrac 5

Sportrac 5

Summer

± 6

Tests 72 · 2 tests Owners 78 · 336 reviews

Best test result: #2 of 20 in 2018 Auto Bild 15 inch Summer Tyre Test (noise)

“Ah yes, it is Dutch, and also produced in the Netherlands(east side of the country).. I am going this afternoon for the new ones, the sportrac 5 is well known here, I will keep you posted..”

Michelin CrossClimate+
Tire BMichelin

CrossClimate+

All Season

± 5

Tests 81 · 13 tests Owners 78 · 120 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 15 in 2019 Summer and All Season Tyre Test (dry handling)

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 73

    Dry

    CrossClimate+ +14
    87
    Why this score
    SourceSportrac 5CrossClimate+
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / 13 tests7194
    Reviews found online7777
    Dry Braking (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–096%92%
    Dry Handling (tester's mark) (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–080%70%

    Sportrac 5: 60% × 71.2 + 40% × 76.9 = 73

    CrossClimate+: 60% × 93.9 + 40% × 77.4 = 87

  2. 76

    Wet

    CrossClimate+ +5
    81
    Why this score
    SourceSportrac 5CrossClimate+
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / 13 tests7381
    Reviews found online8081
    Straight Aquaplaning (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–197%98%
    Wet Handling (tester's mark) (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–070%60%
    Wet Braking (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–195%96%

    Sportrac 5: 60% × 72.9 + 40% × 79.6 = 76

    CrossClimate+: 60% × 80.8 + 40% × 81.2 = 81

  3. –

    Snow

    No comparison
    68
    Why this score
    SourceSportrac 5CrossClimate+
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 9 tests–65
    Reviews found online–73

    CrossClimate+: 60% × 65.1 + 40% × 72.8 = 68

  4. 72

    Comfort

    CrossClimate+ +3
    75
    Why this score
    SourceSportrac 5CrossClimate+
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 70 (est.)71
    Reviews found online7477

    Sportrac 5: 40% × 69.7 (est.) + 60% × 74 = 72

    CrossClimate+: 40% × 70.9 + 60% × 77.1 = 75

    No road tests of comfort for Sportrac 5. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. 71

    Noise

    Sportrac 5 +4
    67
    Why this score
    SourceSportrac 5CrossClimate+
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 9 tests7568
    Reviews found online≈ 66 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)

    Sportrac 5: 60% × 74.8 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 71

    CrossClimate+: 60% × 67.6 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 67

    No owner ratings of noise for Sportrac 5 or CrossClimate+. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  6. 74

    Treadwear

    CrossClimate+ +8
    82
    Why this score
    SourceSportrac 5CrossClimate+
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 3 tests7183
    Reviews found online7880

    Sportrac 5: 60% × 71.2 + 40% × 77.6 = 74

    CrossClimate+: 60% × 83.2 + 40% × 79.7 = 82

  7. 77

    Handling (owners)

    Sportrac 5 +5
    72
    Why this score
    SourceSportrac 5CrossClimate+
    Reviews found online7772
  8. 73

    Efficiency

    CrossClimate+ +1
    74
    Why this score
    SourceSportrac 5CrossClimate+
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 8 tests7374
Scores at a glance
Vredestein Sportrac 5 vs Michelin CrossClimate+: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryVredestein Sportrac 5Michelin CrossClimate+
Relative Score 74 81
Dry 73 87
Wet 76 81
Snow – 68
Comfort 72 75
Noise 71 67
Treadwear 74 82
Handling (owners) 77 72
Efficiency 73 74

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 6

Sportrac 5

± 5

CrossClimate+

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

In the overall rankings of 2 tests that ran both, Vredestein Sportrac 5 finished ahead 2 times and Michelin CrossClimate+ 0 times.

DisciplineCategorySportrac 5CrossClimate+ΔHead-to-head
Dry Braking Dry 96% 92% +4.4 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2019 Swedish Summer Tyre Test · 205/55 R16
Dry Handling (tester's mark) Dry 80% 70% +10.0 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2019 Swedish Summer Tyre Test · 205/55 R16
Straight Aquaplaning Wet 97% 98% −1.4 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2019 Swedish Summer Tyre Test · 205/55 R16
Wet Braking Wet 95% 96% −1.0 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2019 Swedish Summer Tyre Test · 205/55 R16
Wet Handling (tester's mark) Wet 70% 60% +10.0 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2019 Swedish Summer Tyre Test · 205/55 R16
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Overall Ranking Overall #2/16 #3/16 – 2–0 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2019 ADAC Summer Tyre Test - 185/65 R15 · 185/65 R15

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Sportrac 5

Pros

  • Excellent dry and wet grip for daily driving
  • Quiet and comfortable ride quality
  • Strong wear resistance and long tread life

Cons

  • Soft sidewalls can feel vague or cause a 'floating' sensation on true sports cars
  • Reduced stability and increased risk of hydroplaning in heavy standing water or deep puddles
  • Some users reported a harsher ride due to stiffer compounds depending on the tire size
All owner themes in the Sportrac 5 review

Tire B CrossClimate+

Pros

  • Strong snow and cold-weather traction for an all-season tyre, with many owners reporting winter-tyre-like confidence on snow, slush and hills, including on front-wheel-drive cars.
  • Excellent dry handling and steering response with precise, summer-tyre-like feel, along with generally very good wet grip and braking.
  • Long tread life: many reports of 30,000–55,000+ km or miles with low wear, including taxi and van use and 4-year/50,000-mile ownership.

Cons

  • Performance degradation with age: several owners report grip (wet and snow), noise and ride deteriorating after about 1–2 years, with hardening or cracking of the rubber in some cases.
  • Limitations on ice, packed snow and deep or steep snow, where some owners found them inferior to dedicated winter tyres or to rivals such as the Goodyear Vector 4Seasons.
  • Wet-weather concerns for some, including aquaplaning, being pulled around by standing water, and scary steering feel as the tyres aged.
All owner themes in the CrossClimate+ review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Vredestein Sportrac 5

Positive

Community sentiment toward the Vredestein Sportrac 5 is overwhelmingly positive, particularly among drivers of classic and older European or enthusiast cars. Users praise its strong wet and dry grip, sidewall stability, and compliant ride, frequently recommending it as one of the few high-quality summer performance tires still offered in rare 14-inch and 15-inch sizes.

Top themes
#wet and dry grip#rare vintage wheel sizes#value and pricing#ride comfort and stability#classic car fitment#grand touring summer performance

Based on 26 community posts

Tire B

Michelin CrossClimate+

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Vredestein Sportrac 5 B · Michelin CrossClimate+
CategorySummerAll Season
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available3563
Rim diameters14″ – 17″13″ – 19″
Sizes in common2121

Which one should you actually buy?

Vredestein Sportrac 5

Michelin CrossClimate+

Winner: Michelin CrossClimate+ — better dry, treadwear and wet. Pick the Vredestein Sportrac 5 if noise matters most to you.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Michelin CrossClimate+ scores 87 vs 73 on dry.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Michelin CrossClimate+ scores 82 vs 74 on treadwear.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Michelin CrossClimate+ scores 81 vs 76 on wet.

Pick tire A You want a quieter cabin

Vredestein Sportrac 5 scores 71 vs 67 on noise.

Tire A · Vredestein Sportrac 5
Tire B · Michelin CrossClimate+

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Sportrac 5 or CrossClimate+?

Which is better in the wet, Sportrac 5 or CrossClimate+?

Michelin CrossClimate+, 81 vs 76 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Sportrac 5 or CrossClimate+?

Michelin CrossClimate+, 87 vs 73 on our dry score.

Which is quieter, Sportrac 5 or CrossClimate+?

Vredestein Sportrac 5, 71 vs 67 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, Sportrac 5 or CrossClimate+?

Michelin CrossClimate+, 75 vs 72 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Sportrac 5 or CrossClimate+?

Michelin CrossClimate+, 82 vs 74 on our treadwear score.

Which rolls more easily, Sportrac 5 or CrossClimate+?

Neither, by our numbers: 73 vs 74 on the efficiency score, within 3 points.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology