Head-to-head Updated

Vredestein Sportrac 5 vs Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 2 + 0 road tests and 336 + 63 owner reviews. How we score

Sportrac 5 leads, 74–72 Narrow edge

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Vredestein Sportrac 5

Sportrac 5

Summer

± 5

Tests 72 · 2 tests Owners 78 · 336 reviews

Best test result: #2 of 20 in 2018 Auto Bild 15 inch Summer Tyre Test (noise)

“Ah yes, it is Dutch, and also produced in the Netherlands(east side of the country).. I am going this afternoon for the new ones, the sportrac 5 is well known here, I will keep you posted..”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 73

    Dry

    Sportrac 5 +2
    71
    Why this score
    SourceSportrac 5BluEarth Es ES32
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / – tests71≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online7773

    Sportrac 5: 60% × 71.2 + 40% × 76.9 = 73

    BluEarth Es ES32: 60% × 70 (est.) + 40% × 72.9 = 71

    No road tests of dry for BluEarth Es ES32. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 76

    Wet

    Sportrac 5 +1
    75
    Why this score
    SourceSportrac 5BluEarth Es ES32
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / – tests73≈ 74 (est.)
    Reviews found online8076

    Sportrac 5: 60% × 72.9 + 40% × 79.6 = 76

    BluEarth Es ES32: 60% × 73.7 (est.) + 40% × 76.2 = 75

    No road tests of wet for BluEarth Es ES32. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 72

    Comfort

    BluEarth Es ES32 +2
    74
    Why this score
    SourceSportrac 5BluEarth Es ES32
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 70 (est.)≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online7476

    Sportrac 5: 40% × 69.7 (est.) + 60% × 74 = 72

    BluEarth Es ES32: 40% × 70.1 (est.) + 60% × 75.8 = 74

    No road tests of comfort for Sportrac 5. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

    No road tests of comfort for BluEarth Es ES32. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  4. 71

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceSportrac 5BluEarth Es ES32
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests75–
    Reviews found online≈ 66 (est.)–

    Sportrac 5: 60% × 74.8 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 71

    No owner ratings of noise for Sportrac 5. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  5. 74

    Treadwear

    Sportrac 5 +7
    67
    Why this score
    SourceSportrac 5BluEarth Es ES32
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests71≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online7867

    Sportrac 5: 60% × 71.2 + 40% × 77.6 = 74

    BluEarth Es ES32: 60% × 66.5 (est.) + 40% × 66.5 = 67

    No road tests of treadwear for BluEarth Es ES32. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  6. 77

    Handling (owners)

    Level
    77
    Why this score
    SourceSportrac 5BluEarth Es ES32
    Reviews found online7777
  7. 73

    Efficiency

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceSportrac 5BluEarth Es ES32
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests73–
Scores at a glance
Vredestein Sportrac 5 vs Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryVredestein Sportrac 5Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32
Relative Score 74 72
Dry 73 71
Wet 76 75
Comfort 72 74
Noise 71 –
Treadwear 74 67
Handling (owners) 77 77
Efficiency 73 –

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 5

Sportrac 5

± 8

BluEarth Es ES32

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Sportrac 5

Pros

  • Excellent dry and wet grip for daily driving
  • Quiet and comfortable ride quality
  • Strong wear resistance and long tread life

Cons

  • Soft sidewalls can feel vague or cause a 'floating' sensation on true sports cars
  • Reduced stability and increased risk of hydroplaning in heavy standing water or deep puddles
  • Some users reported a harsher ride due to stiffer compounds depending on the tire size
All owner themes in the Sportrac 5 review

Tire B BluEarth Es ES32

Pros

  • Exceptional ride comfort and smoothness over bumps
  • Noticeably low road noise and quiet operation
  • Strong value for money compared to premium brands

Cons

  • Faster-than-average tread wear reported by some drivers
  • Diminished wet weather grip and increased skidding risk as the tread wears down
  • Not suited for high-performance driving or aggressive cornering
All owner themes in the BluEarth Es ES32 review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Vredestein Sportrac 5

Positive

Community sentiment toward the Vredestein Sportrac 5 is overwhelmingly positive, particularly among drivers of classic and older European or enthusiast cars. Users praise its strong wet and dry grip, sidewall stability, and compliant ride, frequently recommending it as one of the few high-quality summer performance tires still offered in rare 14-inch and 15-inch sizes.

Top themes
#wet and dry grip#rare vintage wheel sizes#value and pricing#ride comfort and stability#classic car fitment#grand touring summer performance

Based on 26 community posts

Tire B

Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Vredestein Sportrac 5 B · Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available3564
Rim diameters14″ – 17″13″ – 18″
Sizes in common2727

Which one should you actually buy?

Vredestein Sportrac 5

Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32

Narrow edge: Vredestein Sportrac 5 — better treadwear. Where the Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 is ahead, it is by less than 3 points.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Vredestein Sportrac 5 scores 74 vs 67 on treadwear.

Tire A · Vredestein Sportrac 5
Tire B · Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Sportrac 5 or BluEarth Es ES32?

Which is better in the wet, Sportrac 5 or BluEarth Es ES32?

Neither, by our numbers: 76 vs 75 on the wet score, within 3 points.

Which grips better on dry roads, Sportrac 5 or BluEarth Es ES32?

Neither, by our numbers: 73 vs 71 on the dry score, within 3 points.

Which is more comfortable, Sportrac 5 or BluEarth Es ES32?

Neither, by our numbers: 72 vs 74 on the comfort score, within 3 points.

Which lasts longer, Sportrac 5 or BluEarth Es ES32?

Vredestein Sportrac 5, 74 vs 67 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology