Best test result: #3 of 21 in 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test (curved aquaplaning)
“I have vredestein ultrac pro’s on my golf R currently in 245/40r18 - I have been very pleased with the performance for the price. They’ve taken over 1G in corners with no issues. Wearing pretty well about 5k miles in as well. I’d say they’re about 85-90% as good as a PS4S or EC02. Been surprisingly good in the rain too”
Best test result: #2 of 55 in 2024 Summer Tyre Market Overview (dry braking)
“Yup, noticed that on my car too, went from a dot 2023 225/45/r17 PS5 to 205/50/r17 Kumho ecsta hs52 and while i went down in width, speed went up about 5-7km/h during a tight hairpin i always frequent, i feel a lot more confident chucking it towards the apex and not fear understeer ( my car is FWD).”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
76
Dry
Ecsta HS52 +5
81
Why this score
Source
Ultrac
Ecsta HS52
Professional tests (TWG score)
83
85
Reviews found online
66
75
Dry Braking (% of best)
95%
100%
Dry Handling (% of best)
99%
100%
81
Wet
Ecsta HS52 +1
82
Why this score
Source
Ultrac
Ecsta HS52
Professional tests (TWG score)
90
88
Reviews found online
69
72
Wet Braking (% of best)
97%
97%
Wet Braking - Concrete (% of best)
88%
90%
Wet Circle (% of best)
98%
91%
Wet Handling (% of best)
25%
97%
67
Comfort
Ultrac +2
65
Why this score
Source
Ultrac
Ecsta HS52
Reviews found online
65
60
67
Noise
Ultrac +2
65
Why this score
Source
Ultrac
Ecsta HS52
Professional tests (TWG score)
67
64
28
Treadwear
Ecsta HS52 +45
73
Why this score
Source
Ultrac
Ecsta HS52
Professional tests (TWG score)
10
78
Reviews found online
56
66
65
Handling
Ecsta HS52 +10
75
Why this score
Source
Ultrac
Ecsta HS52
Reviews found online
65
75
Scores at a glance
Vredestein Ultrac vs Kumho Ecsta HS52: scores by category (0–100)
Category
Vredestein Ultrac
Kumho Ecsta HS52
Relative Score
63
76
Dry
76
81
Wet
81
82
Comfort
67
65
Noise
67
65
Treadwear
28
73
Handling
65
75
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
63
/ 100
Ultrac
76
/ 100
Ecsta HS52
The professional test results behind the scores
Each result is shown as % of the best tire in that test. “Same test” rows are the strictest comparison: both tires were measured side by side.
Discipline
Category
Ultrac
Ecsta HS52
Δ
Both?
Curved Aquaplaning
Curved
95%#3/21 · 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test
82%#18/21 · 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test
+12.8
Same test
Dry Braking
Dry
95%#6/8 · 2024 Auto Express Summer Tyre Test
100%#2/55 · 2024 Summer Tyre Market Overview
−4.7
Different tests
Dry Handling
Dry
99%#7/8 · 2024 AMS Summer SUV Tyre Test
100%#3/20 · 2024 AutoBild Summer Tyre Test
−0.8
Different tests
Rolling Resistance
Efficiency
84%#5/10 · 2025 Autobild SUV Off-Road Summer Tyre Test
88%#16/20 · 2024 AutoBild Summer Tyre Test
−4.8
Different tests
Fuel Consumption
Fuel
97%#7/16 · 2024 ADAC Summer Tyre Test
93%#46/50 · 2023 ADAC Summer Tyre Test
+3.4
Different tests
Abrasion
Other
47%#16/16 · 2024 ADAC Summer Tyre Test
44%#30/50 · 2023 ADAC Summer Tyre Test
+3.0
Different tests
Noise
Other
96%#21/21 · 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test
98%#8/21 · 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test
−2.1
Same test
Price
Other
68%#10/16 · 2024 ADAC Summer Tyre Test
77%#5/16 · 2024 ADAC Summer Tyre Test
−8.9
Same test
Value
Other
38%#20/20 · 2024 AutoBild Summer Tyre Test
98%#2/21 · 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test
−60.3
Different tests
Wear
Other
53%#19/21 · 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test
77%#5/21 · 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test
−23.8
Same test
Overall Ranking
Overall
25%#7/8 · 2023 Autoklub ČR Premium Summer Tire Test R16
40%#4/6 · 2023 Autoklub ČR Budget Summer Tire Test R16
−15.0
Different tests
Straight Aqua
Straight
98%#6/21 · 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test
94%#16/16 · 2024 ADAC Summer Tyre Test
+3.9
Different tests
Total Cost of Ownership
Total
0%#20/21 · 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test
0%#7/21 · 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test
0.0
Same test
Wet Braking
Wet
97%#3/20 · 2024 AutoBild Summer Tyre Test
97%#3/16 · 2026 ADAC Summer Tyre Test
+0.1
Different tests
Wet Braking - Concrete
Wet
88%#3/16 · 2024 ADAC Summer Tyre Test
90%#3/16 · 2026 ADAC Summer Tyre Test
−1.8
Different tests
Wet Circle
Wet
98%#4/8 · 2024 AMS Summer SUV Tyre Test
91%#15/21 · 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test
+6.6
Different tests
Wet Handling
Wet
25%#5/6 · 2024 ACE/ARBÖ/GTÜ Summer Tire Test R17
97%#14/21 · 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test
−71.9
Different tests
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Ultrac
Pros
Exceptional grip and confidence in wet weather conditions
High level of ride comfort and ability to absorb road bumps
Low road noise and quiet operation
Cons
Rapid tread wear reported by several drivers
Softer sidewalls leading to less initial steering feedback or stability
Occasional complaints of tramlining or tracking narrow road repairs
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Tire A
Vredestein Ultrac
Positive
Community members generally view the Vredestein Ultrac and Ultrac Pro as a compelling, budget-friendly alternative to premium high-performance summer tires like the Michelin Pilot Sport 4S. Users frequently highlight significant cost savings alongside comparable dry and wet performance, comfort, and noise levels, though a few note trade-offs in extreme cornering stiffness.
#Price and Value Comparison#Comparison to Michelin PS4S#Wet and Dry Grip#Ride Comfort and Noise#Tread Wear and Longevity#Handling and Steering Feel
Based on 17 community posts
Tire B
Kumho Ecsta HS52
Mixed
The Kumho Ecsta HS52 receives a polarized mix of reviews from the community, praised by many for its rigid sidewalls, strong dry grip, sharp steering responsiveness, and great value compared to premium alternatives. However, some users report disappointing wet weather performance, potential issues with aquaplaning resistance, and inconsistent test results across different sizes. Overall, it is viewed as a solid mid-range option, though experiences with wet traction and longevity vary significantly among drivers.
#Dry grip and handling#Wet weather performance#Sidewall stiffness#Price and value#Comparison with competitors#Fuel economy and weight#Tread wear and durability
Based on 17 community posts
Specs side by side
Attribute
A · Vredestein Ultrac
B · Kumho Ecsta HS52
Category
Summer
Summer
Vehicle type
Passenger Car / Crossover
Passenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available
65
53
Rim diameters
15″ – 21″
14″ – 20″
Which one should you actually buy?
63
/ 100
Vredestein Ultrac
76
/ 100
Kumho Ecsta HS52
Winner: Kumho Ecsta HS52 — better treadwear, handling and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.