Head-to-head Updated

Vredestein Ultrac vs Kumho Ecsta HS52 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.

Ecsta HS52 is ahead, 76–63

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Ultrac

Summer

Tests 61 · 14 tests Owners 64 · 411 reviews

Best test result: #3 of 21 in 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test (curved aquaplaning)

“I have vredestein ultrac pro’s on my golf R currently in 245/40r18 - I have been very pleased with the performance for the price. They’ve taken over 1G in corners with no issues. Wearing pretty well about 5k miles in as well. I’d say they’re about 85-90% as good as a PS4S or EC02. Been surprisingly good in the rain too”

Tire BKumho

Ecsta HS52

Summer

Tests 82 · 7 tests Owners 71 · 2,328 reviews

Best test result: #2 of 55 in 2024 Summer Tyre Market Overview (dry braking)

“Yup, noticed that on my car too, went from a dot 2023 225/45/r17 PS5 to 205/50/r17 Kumho ecsta hs52 and while i went down in width, speed went up about 5-7km/h during a tight hairpin i always frequent, i feel a lot more confident chucking it towards the apex and not fear understeer ( my car is FWD).”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 76

    Dry

    Ecsta HS52 +5
    81
    Why this score
    SourceUltracEcsta HS52
    Professional tests (TWG score)8385
    Reviews found online6675
    Dry Braking (% of best)95%100%
    Dry Handling (% of best)99%100%
  2. 81

    Wet

    Ecsta HS52 +1
    82
    Why this score
    SourceUltracEcsta HS52
    Professional tests (TWG score)9088
    Reviews found online6972
    Wet Braking (% of best)97%97%
    Wet Braking - Concrete (% of best)88%90%
    Wet Circle (% of best)98%91%
    Wet Handling (% of best)25%97%
  3. 67

    Comfort

    Ultrac +2
    65
    Why this score
    SourceUltracEcsta HS52
    Reviews found online6560
  4. 67

    Noise

    Ultrac +2
    65
    Why this score
    SourceUltracEcsta HS52
    Professional tests (TWG score)6764
  5. 28

    Treadwear

    Ecsta HS52 +45
    73
    Why this score
    SourceUltracEcsta HS52
    Professional tests (TWG score)1078
    Reviews found online5666
  6. 65

    Handling

    Ecsta HS52 +10
    75
    Why this score
    SourceUltracEcsta HS52
    Reviews found online6575
Scores at a glance
Vredestein Ultrac vs Kumho Ecsta HS52: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryVredestein UltracKumho Ecsta HS52
Relative Score 63 76
Dry 76 81
Wet 81 82
Comfort 67 65
Noise 67 65
Treadwear 28 73
Handling 65 75

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Ultrac

Ecsta HS52

The professional test results behind the scores

Each result is shown as % of the best tire in that test. “Same test” rows are the strictest comparison: both tires were measured side by side.

DisciplineCategoryUltracEcsta HS52ΔBoth?
Curved Aquaplaning Curved 95% #3/21 · 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test 82% #18/21 · 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test +12.8 Same test
Dry Braking Dry 95% #6/8 · 2024 Auto Express Summer Tyre Test 100% #2/55 · 2024 Summer Tyre Market Overview −4.7 Different tests
Dry Handling Dry 99% #7/8 · 2024 AMS Summer SUV Tyre Test 100% #3/20 · 2024 AutoBild Summer Tyre Test −0.8 Different tests
Rolling Resistance Efficiency 84% #5/10 · 2025 Autobild SUV Off-Road Summer Tyre Test 88% #16/20 · 2024 AutoBild Summer Tyre Test −4.8 Different tests
Fuel Consumption Fuel 97% #7/16 · 2024 ADAC Summer Tyre Test 93% #46/50 · 2023 ADAC Summer Tyre Test +3.4 Different tests
Abrasion Other 47% #16/16 · 2024 ADAC Summer Tyre Test 44% #30/50 · 2023 ADAC Summer Tyre Test +3.0 Different tests
Noise Other 96% #21/21 · 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test 98% #8/21 · 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test −2.1 Same test
Price Other 68% #10/16 · 2024 ADAC Summer Tyre Test 77% #5/16 · 2024 ADAC Summer Tyre Test −8.9 Same test
Value Other 38% #20/20 · 2024 AutoBild Summer Tyre Test 98% #2/21 · 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test −60.3 Different tests
Wear Other 53% #19/21 · 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test 77% #5/21 · 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test −23.8 Same test
Overall Ranking Overall 25% #7/8 · 2023 Autoklub ČR Premium Summer Tire Test R16 40% #4/6 · 2023 Autoklub ČR Budget Summer Tire Test R16 −15.0 Different tests
Straight Aqua Straight 98% #6/21 · 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test 94% #16/16 · 2024 ADAC Summer Tyre Test +3.9 Different tests
Total Cost of Ownership Total 0% #20/21 · 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test 0% #7/21 · 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test 0.0 Same test
Wet Braking Wet 97% #3/20 · 2024 AutoBild Summer Tyre Test 97% #3/16 · 2026 ADAC Summer Tyre Test +0.1 Different tests
Wet Braking - Concrete Wet 88% #3/16 · 2024 ADAC Summer Tyre Test 90% #3/16 · 2026 ADAC Summer Tyre Test −1.8 Different tests
Wet Circle Wet 98% #4/8 · 2024 AMS Summer SUV Tyre Test 91% #15/21 · 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test +6.6 Different tests
Wet Handling Wet 25% #5/6 · 2024 ACE/ARBÖ/GTÜ Summer Tire Test R17 97% #14/21 · 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test −71.9 Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Ultrac

Pros

  • Exceptional grip and confidence in wet weather conditions
  • High level of ride comfort and ability to absorb road bumps
  • Low road noise and quiet operation

Cons

  • Rapid tread wear reported by several drivers
  • Softer sidewalls leading to less initial steering feedback or stability
  • Occasional complaints of tramlining or tracking narrow road repairs
All owner themes in the Ultrac review

Tire B Ecsta HS52

Pros

  • Excellent wet and dry weather traction
  • Low road noise and quiet operation
  • Smooth and comfortable ride quality

Cons

  • A few reports of accelerated or abnormal tread wear
  • Slightly sensitive to tire pressure regarding comfort
  • Occasional complaints of high-speed vibration or imbalance early on
All owner themes in the Ecsta HS52 review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Vredestein Ultrac

Positive

Community members generally view the Vredestein Ultrac and Ultrac Pro as a compelling, budget-friendly alternative to premium high-performance summer tires like the Michelin Pilot Sport 4S. Users frequently highlight significant cost savings alongside comparable dry and wet performance, comfort, and noise levels, though a few note trade-offs in extreme cornering stiffness.

Top themes
#Price and Value Comparison#Comparison to Michelin PS4S#Wet and Dry Grip#Ride Comfort and Noise#Tread Wear and Longevity#Handling and Steering Feel

Based on 17 community posts

Tire B

Kumho Ecsta HS52

Mixed

The Kumho Ecsta HS52 receives a polarized mix of reviews from the community, praised by many for its rigid sidewalls, strong dry grip, sharp steering responsiveness, and great value compared to premium alternatives. However, some users report disappointing wet weather performance, potential issues with aquaplaning resistance, and inconsistent test results across different sizes. Overall, it is viewed as a solid mid-range option, though experiences with wet traction and longevity vary significantly among drivers.

r/tires ·3 upvotes ·2025-09-23

“What’s up with these tyres? Kumho ectsa hs52 date code 3923, tyres are (UK) legal regards tread but I can’t imagine this damage is normal. Both front tyres have this, looks like the tread is tearing apart in multiple places. I did not fit these tyres but it was mot’d 3 months ago and has done 2k miles since. I’ve owned the car 11 months but only noticed this very recently. I am getting them replaced on Monday with little use before then but I’m curious how this has happened. Is it just a shit brand? Wear is even across the face so I don’t think it would be the alignment or anything to do with the car and the damage is random across the contact patch. It’s a Peugeot 508 2l diesel so quite a bit of weight on the nose. Fitting Bridgestone Turanza 6. Rear tyres are good, but a different brand (horizon horace 2122 date)”

r/CarTalkUK ·1 upvote ·2025-01-11

“I have kuhmo ecsta hs52's on my renault megane during spring and summer and they are really good. No complaints at all. My milage did go up a little bit but that's it”

r/Mazda323 ·6 upvotes ·2026-06-14

“Mini review of the Kumho Ecsta HS52 I was running some Hankook's on my GT before and the tire wall not stiff enough. Now I've mounted these Kumho Ecsta HS52's and I highly recommend them: The tire wall is nicely rigid and they grip great in the dry, took quite some intent to make them loose traction. Additionally, I've accidentally ran over a pretty big sharp looking rock at decent speed that aimed right in a tread groove (thinnest part) and the thing shrugged it off no problem. And all of this for a damn good price too! So if anyone's looking for good tires, now you know.”

Top themes
#Dry grip and handling#Wet weather performance#Sidewall stiffness#Price and value#Comparison with competitors#Fuel economy and weight#Tread wear and durability

Based on 17 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Vredestein Ultrac B · Kumho Ecsta HS52
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available6553
Rim diameters15″ – 21″14″ – 20″

Which one should you actually buy?

Vredestein Ultrac

Kumho Ecsta HS52

Winner: Kumho Ecsta HS52 — better treadwear, handling and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Kumho Ecsta HS52 scores 73 vs 28 on treadwear.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Kumho Ecsta HS52 scores 75 vs 65 on handling.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Kumho Ecsta HS52 scores 81 vs 76 on dry.

Tire A · Vredestein Ultrac
Tire B · Kumho Ecsta HS52

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.

76

Leads

Ecsta HS52

Amazon