tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Vredestein Ultrac vs Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 14 + 31 road tests and 419 + 1,929 owner reviews. How we score

Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 is ahead, 89–61

Check price on Amazon · Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 or Ultrac on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Vredestein Ultrac
Tire AVredestein

Ultrac

Summer

± 6

Tests 63 · 14 tests Owners 59 · 419 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 20 in 2024 AutoBild Summer Tyre Test (wet handling)

“Are budget tyres closing the gap to premium? I changed a set of tyres on my daily pd130 winter bash about and managed to get a set of vredestein ultrac for £80 a tyre fitted which I thought was a pretty good price. The tyre fitting service was saying to me that the gap between budgets and premium is much smaller in the last 10 years and that taxis tend to opt for budget tyres all the time and have no issues. Any thoughts on this? I’ve always gone for medium to higher end tyres. Leer más”

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
Tire BGoodyear

Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6

Summer

± 4

Tests 93 · 31 tests Owners 84 · 1,929 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 20 in 2026 Autobild Summer Tyre Test (wear)

“I've had the Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 (235/45/18). They were really sturdy, comfort was super bad with them and I sold them for half the price. These are sport tyres, you do not need them.”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

Key facts

  • In 4 tests that measured straight aquaplaning for both, Ultrac won 3 and Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 won 1 (average 98% vs 98% of the best).
  • In 4 tests that measured wet handling for both, Ultrac won 2 and Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 won 2 (average 98% vs 99% of the best).
  • In 4 tests that measured rolling resistance for both, Ultrac won 3 and Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 won 1 (average 94% vs 92% of the best).
  • In 3 tests that measured dry braking for both, Ultrac won 1 and Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 won 2 (average 93% vs 94% of the best).
  • In 3 tests that measured wet braking for both, Ultrac won 2 and Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 won 1 (average 97% vs 97% of the best).
  1. 75

    Dry

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 +19
    94
    Why this score
    SourceUltracEagle F1 Asymmetric 6
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 13 / 30 tests8496
    Reviews found online6091
    Dry Braking (% of best) · 3 shared tests · wins 1–293%94%
    Dry Handling (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 0–298%100%
    Dry Handling (tester's mark) (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 0–280%90%

    Ultrac: 60% × 84.3 + 40% × 60.3 = 75

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6: 60% × 96.4 + 40% × 91.1 = 94

  2. 82

    Wet

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 +10
    92
    Why this score
    SourceUltracEagle F1 Asymmetric 6
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 13 / 31 tests9293
    Reviews found online6692
    Curved Aquaplaning (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–0100%95%
    Straight Aquaplaning (% of best) · 4 shared tests · wins 3–198%98%
    Wet Handling (tester's mark) (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 2–080%70%
    Wet Braking (% of best) · 3 shared tests · wins 2–197%97%
    Wet Circle (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–199%100%
    Wet Handling (% of best) · 4 shared tests · wins 2–298%99%

    Ultrac: 60% × 92 + 40% × 66.4 = 82

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6: 60% × 92.9 + 40% × 91.5 = 92

  3. 63

    Comfort

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 +16
    79
    Why this score
    SourceUltracEagle F1 Asymmetric 6
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 10 tests≈ 67 (est.)76
    Reviews found online6081

    Ultrac: 40% × 67 (est.) + 60% × 60.3 = 63

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6: 40% × 75.7 + 60% × 81.3 = 79

    No road tests of comfort for Ultrac. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  4. 67

    Noise

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 +15
    82
    Why this score
    SourceUltracEagle F1 Asymmetric 6
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 11 / 26 tests6793
    Reviews found online≈ 66 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Interior Noise (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 1–090%87%
    Noise (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–099%97%
    Noise (tester's mark) (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–080%80%

    Ultrac: 60% × 66.9 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 67

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6: 60% × 92.6 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 82

    No owner ratings of noise for Ultrac or Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  5. 25

    Treadwear

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 +61
    86
    Why this score
    SourceUltracEagle F1 Asymmetric 6
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / 7 tests1096
    Reviews found online4870

    Ultrac: 60% × 10 + 40% × 48.3 = 25

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6: 60% × 96.4 + 40% × 69.8 = 86

  6. 60

    Handling (owners)

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 +30
    90
    Why this score
    SourceUltracEagle F1 Asymmetric 6
    Reviews found online6090
  7. 72

    Efficiency

    Ultrac +1
    71
    Why this score
    SourceUltracEagle F1 Asymmetric 6
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 11 / 26 tests7271
    Rolling Resistance (% of best) · 4 shared tests · wins 3–194%92%
Scores at a glance
CategoryVredestein UltracGoodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
Relative Score 61 89
Dry 75 94
Wet 82 92
Comfort 63 79
Noise 67 82
Treadwear 25 86
Handling (owners) 60 90
Efficiency 72 71

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 6

Ultrac

± 4

Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

In the overall rankings of 4 tests that ran both, Vredestein Ultrac finished ahead 3 times and Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 1 times.

DisciplineCategoryUltracEagle F1 Asymmetric 6ΔHead-to-head
Dry Braking Dry 93% 94% −1.2 1–2 in 3 shared tests Newest: 2025 UTAC / Aftonbladet Summer & All-Season Tire Test R17 · 225/45R17
Dry Handling Dry 98% 100% −1.6 0–2 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2025 Autobild SUV Off-Road Summer Tyre Test · 255/55 R18
Dry Handling (tester's mark) Dry 80% 90% −10.0 0–2 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2025 UTAC / Aftonbladet Summer & All-Season Tire Test R17 · 225/45R17
Curved Aquaplaning Wet 100% 95% +5.5 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2025 Autobild SUV Off-Road Summer Tyre Test · 255/55 R18
Straight Aquaplaning Wet 98% 98% +0.4 3–1 in 4 shared tests Newest: 2025 UTAC / Aftonbladet Summer & All-Season Tire Test R17 · 225/45R17
Wet Braking Wet 97% 97% +0.1 2–1 in 3 shared tests Newest: 2025 UTAC / Aftonbladet Summer & All-Season Tire Test R17 · 225/45R17
Wet Circle Wet 99% 100% −0.9 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2024 Auto Express Summer Tyre Test · 225/45 R17
Wet Handling Wet 98% 99% −0.1 2–2 in 4 shared tests Newest: 2025 UTAC / Aftonbladet Summer & All-Season Tire Test R17 · 225/45R17
Wet Handling (tester's mark) Wet 80% 70% +10.0 2–0 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2025 UTAC / Aftonbladet Summer & All-Season Tire Test R17 · 225/45R17
Interior Noise Noise 90% 87% +3.0 1–0 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2025 UTAC / Aftonbladet Summer & All-Season Tire Test R17 · 225/45R17
Noise Noise 99% 97% +1.7 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2025 Autobild SUV Off-Road Summer Tyre Test · 255/55 R18
Noise (tester's mark) Noise 80% 80% 0.0 0–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2025 Summer and All Season Combined Tyre Test · 225/45 R17
Rolling Resistance Efficiency 94% 92% +2.3 3–1 in 4 shared tests Newest: 2025 UTAC / Aftonbladet Summer & All-Season Tire Test R17 · 225/45R17
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Grass Traction Off-road 88% 93% −5.4 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2025 Autobild SUV Off-Road Summer Tyre Test · 255/55 R18
Gravel Handling Off-road 99% 99% +0.2 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2025 Autobild SUV Off-Road Summer Tyre Test · 255/55 R18
Gravel Traction Off-road 88% 85% +2.2 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2025 Autobild SUV Off-Road Summer Tyre Test · 255/55 R18
Sand Traction Off-road 89% 85% +4.7 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2025 Autobild SUV Off-Road Summer Tyre Test · 255/55 R18
Overall Ranking Overall #9/12 #11/12 – 3–1 in 4 shared tests Newest: 2025 UTAC / Aftonbladet Summer & All-Season Tire Test R17 · 225/45R17

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Ultrac

Pros

  • Exceptional grip and confidence in wet weather conditions
  • High level of ride comfort and ability to absorb road bumps
  • Low road noise and quiet operation

Cons

  • Rapid tread wear reported by several drivers
  • Softer sidewalls leading to less initial steering feedback or stability
  • Occasional complaints of tramlining or tracking narrow road repairs
All owner themes in the Ultrac review

Tire B Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6

Pros

  • Outstanding grip and confidence in both wet and dry weather conditions
  • Noticeably lower road noise and high ride comfort compared to OEM or run-flat tires
  • Sharp, responsive steering feel and progressive handling at the limit

Cons

  • Rapid tread wear and shorter lifespan reported by spirited drivers
  • Soft sidewalls can cause a slightly squishy feel or floatiness during aggressive quick transitions
  • Some susceptibility to aquaplaning in deep standing water at high speeds
All owner themes in the Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Vredestein Ultrac

Positive

Community members generally view the Vredestein Ultrac favorably, recommending it as offering the best of both worlds at a good price point. While drivers appreciate its appearance and value on daily vehicles, prospective buyers express inquiries regarding noise levels and potential fast tread wear.

Top themes
#good price point#best of both worlds#tread wear concerns#tire recommendation#wide tire appearance#budget versus premium

Based on 8 community posts

Tire B

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6

Positive

The Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 is widely regarded as a top-tier UHP summer tyre with strong dry grip, good wet performance and rim protection. It is often recommended as a comparable or better-value alternative to the Michelin PS5. Reservations include a harsh ride and poor comfort for non-sporty daily use, a harshly negative Swedish test of cold-weather braking, concerns about wear and track use, and isolated vibration and EV-rating questions.

r/tires ·1 upvote ·2025-12-06

“No EV ready logo on Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 I recently bought Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 255/45R19 104Y XL SCT tyres. According to this article, this tyre should contain EV Ready logo but my tyres do not have it. I discussed with seller and they claimed that this tyres are ev ready even if it does not have the ev ready logo. Is that possible ? Can i trust that my tyres are EV Ready ?”
taycanforum.com ·2026-04-02

“you could fit them but they are not NF rated, only 5 is NF0 and NF1 rated but on the 21" sized for the sedan.”
f30.bimmerpost.com

“Hi guys thanks for your input and sharing what you are using. I have gone for Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 with 20% off so worked out around £150 each fitted.”
Top themes
#Strong dry grip#Michelin PS5 comparison#Comfort and ride harshness#Wear and durability#Cold-weather performance concerns#Value and pricing#BMW star OEM version#EV-ready and fitment questions

Based on 29 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Vredestein Ultrac B · Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available65130
Rim diameters15″ – 21″17″ – 23″
Tread depth—7 - 9/32″
UTQG280 AA A260 - 300 AA A
Treadwear warranty—30,000 mi
Sidewall—Black Side Wall - Vertical Serrated Band
Max pressure—50 - 51 psi
Sizes in common2727

Which one should you actually buy?

Vredestein Ultrac

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6

Winner: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 — better treadwear, handling and dry. Where the Vredestein Ultrac is ahead, it is by less than 3 points.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 scores 86 vs 25 on treadwear.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 scores 90 vs 60 on handling.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 scores 94 vs 75 on dry.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 scores 79 vs 63 on comfort.

Pick tire A Your priority is straight aquaplaning

Vredestein Ultrac won 3 of 4 shared straight aquaplaning tests.

Tire A · Vredestein Ultrac
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Ultrac or Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6?

Which is better in the wet, Ultrac or Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6?

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6, 92 vs 82 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Ultrac or Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6?

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6, 94 vs 75 on our dry score.

Which is quieter, Ultrac or Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6?

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6, 82 vs 67 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, Ultrac or Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6?

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6, 79 vs 63 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Ultrac or Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6?

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6, 86 vs 25 on our treadwear score.

Which rolls more easily, Ultrac or Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6?

Neither, by our numbers: 72 vs 71 on the efficiency score, within 3 points.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology