Tests – · none yet Owners 60 · 28 reviews
Yokohama A.Drive vs Yokohama BluEarth AE50 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 2 road tests and 28 + 36 owner reviews. How we score
Too close to call: A.Drive 62, BluEarth AE50 63.
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 72 · 2 tests Owners 54 · 36 reviews
Best test result: #6 of 20 in 2020 Auto Zeitung Summer Tyre Test (dry handling)
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
61
Dry
BluEarth AE50 +364Why this score
Source A.Drive BluEarth AE50 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests ≈ 64 (est.) 72 Reviews found online 58 53 A.Drive: 60% × 63.7 (est.) + 40% × 57.7 = 61
BluEarth AE50: 60% × 71.6 + 40% × 52.9 = 64
No road tests of dry for A.Drive. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
-
62
Wet
BluEarth AE50 +567Why this score
Source A.Drive BluEarth AE50 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests ≈ 64 (est.) 72 Reviews found online 59 60 A.Drive: 60% × 63.5 (est.) + 40% × 58.6 = 62
BluEarth AE50: 60% × 71.7 + 40% × 59.7 = 67
No road tests of wet for A.Drive. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
-
64
Comfort
BluEarth AE50 +266Why this score
Source A.Drive BluEarth AE50 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 67 (est.) 73 Reviews found online 58 56 A.Drive: 60% × 67.2 (est.) + 40% × 58.2 = 64
BluEarth AE50: 60% × 72.5 + 40% × 55.8 = 66
No road tests of comfort for A.Drive. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
–
Noise
No comparison70Why this score
Source A.Drive BluEarth AE50 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests – 71 Reviews found online – ≈ 67 (est.) BluEarth AE50: 60% × 71.1 + 40% × 67.3 (est.) = 70
No owner ratings of noise for BluEarth AE50. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
-
65
Treadwear
A.Drive +1055Why this score
Source A.Drive BluEarth AE50 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 65 (est.) ≈ 60 (est.) Reviews found online 64 48 A.Drive: 60% × 65.2 (est.) + 40% × 64.4 = 65
BluEarth AE50: 60% × 60.3 (est.) + 40% × 48.2 = 55
No road tests of treadwear for A.Drive. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
No road tests of treadwear for BluEarth AE50. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
-
59
Handling (owners)
A.Drive +257Why this score
Source A.Drive BluEarth AE50 Reviews found online 59 57
Scores at a glance
| Category | Yokohama A.Drive | Yokohama BluEarth AE50 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 62 | 63 |
| Dry | 61 | 64 |
| Wet | 62 | 67 |
| Comfort | 64 | 66 |
| Noise | – | 70 |
| Treadwear | 65 | 55 |
| Handling (owners) | 59 | 57 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
A.Drive
BluEarth AE50
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A A.Drive
Pros
- Competitive price point offering good value for money
- Reliable and predictable grip in dry road conditions
- Solid durability and tread life for many users
Cons
- Significant issues with wet-weather traction and aquaplaning
- High levels of road noise, particularly at highway speeds
- Inconsistent tread wear performance across different driving styles
Tire B BluEarth AE50
Pros
- Strong wet and dry road grip for daily commuting
- High levels of ride comfort and smoothness
- Good value for money compared to premium competitors
Cons
- Rapid and premature tread wear reported by many users
- Significant increase in road noise as the tire ages
- Soft sidewalls leading to vague steering feedback and poor cornering stability
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Yokohama A.Drive | B · Yokohama BluEarth AE50 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | — | 28 |
| Rim diameters | — | 14″ – 18″ |
Which one should you actually buy?
Yokohama A.Drive
Yokohama BluEarth AE50
Too close to call: Yokohama A.Drive and Yokohama BluEarth AE50 are within 2 points overall. Yokohama A.Drive is stronger on treadwear. Yokohama BluEarth AE50 is stronger on wet and dry.
Yokohama A.Drive scores 65 vs 55 on treadwear.
Yokohama BluEarth AE50 scores 67 vs 62 on wet.
Yokohama BluEarth AE50 scores 64 vs 61 on dry.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
A.Drive or BluEarth AE50?
Which is better in the wet, A.Drive or BluEarth AE50?
Yokohama BluEarth AE50, 67 vs 62 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, A.Drive or BluEarth AE50?
Yokohama BluEarth AE50, 64 vs 61 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, A.Drive or BluEarth AE50?
Neither, by our numbers: 64 vs 66 on the comfort score, within 3 points.
Which lasts longer, A.Drive or BluEarth AE50?
Yokohama A.Drive, 65 vs 55 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology