Tests – · none yet Owners 60 · 28 reviews
Head-to-head
Updated
Yokohama A.Drive vs Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 28 + 60 owner reviews. How we score
BluEarth Es ES32 is ahead, 70–62
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 70 · 60 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
61
Dry
BluEarth Es ES32 +970Why this score
Source A.Drive BluEarth Es ES32 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 64 (est.) ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 58 71 A.Drive: 60% × 63.7 (est.) + 40% × 57.7 = 61
BluEarth Es ES32: 60% × 68.9 (est.) + 40% × 70.6 = 70
No road tests of dry for A.Drive. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
No road tests of dry for BluEarth Es ES32. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
-
62
Wet
BluEarth Es ES32 +1072Why this score
Source A.Drive BluEarth Es ES32 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 64 (est.) ≈ 71 (est.) Reviews found online 59 73 A.Drive: 60% × 63.5 (est.) + 40% × 58.6 = 62
BluEarth Es ES32: 60% × 71.3 (est.) + 40% × 72.5 = 72
No road tests of wet for A.Drive. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
No road tests of wet for BluEarth Es ES32. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
-
64
Comfort
BluEarth Es ES32 +872Why this score
Source A.Drive BluEarth Es ES32 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 58 74 A.Drive: 60% × 67.2 (est.) + 40% × 58.2 = 64
BluEarth Es ES32: 60% × 70 (est.) + 40% × 74.3 = 72
No road tests of comfort for A.Drive or BluEarth Es ES32. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
65
Treadwear
Level65Why this score
Source A.Drive BluEarth Es ES32 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 65 (est.) ≈ 65 (est.) Reviews found online 64 65 A.Drive: 60% × 65.2 (est.) + 40% × 64.4 = 65
BluEarth Es ES32: 60% × 65.3 (est.) + 40% × 64.6 = 65
No road tests of treadwear for A.Drive. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
No road tests of treadwear for BluEarth Es ES32. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
-
59
Handling (owners)
BluEarth Es ES32 +1473Why this score
Source A.Drive BluEarth Es ES32 Reviews found online 59 73
Scores at a glance
| Category | Yokohama A.Drive | Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 62 | 70 |
| Dry | 61 | 70 |
| Wet | 62 | 72 |
| Comfort | 64 | 72 |
| Treadwear | 65 | 65 |
| Handling (owners) | 59 | 73 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
62
/ 100
A.Drive
70
/ 100
BluEarth Es ES32
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A A.Drive
Pros
- Competitive price point offering good value for money
- Reliable and predictable grip in dry road conditions
- Solid durability and tread life for many users
Cons
- Significant issues with wet-weather traction and aquaplaning
- High levels of road noise, particularly at highway speeds
- Inconsistent tread wear performance across different driving styles
Tire B BluEarth Es ES32
Pros
- Exceptional ride comfort and noise reduction
- Strong value proposition compared to premium brands
- Reliable dry-weather traction and handling
Cons
- Wet-weather grip can become unpredictable as tread depth decreases
- Inconsistent tread life, with some users reporting premature wear
- Sidewalls may be susceptible to damage from severe potholes
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Yokohama A.Drive | B · Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | — | 64 |
| Rim diameters | — | 13″ – 18″ |
Which one should you actually buy?
62
/ 100
Yokohama A.Drive
70
/ 100
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32
Winner: Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 — better handling, wet and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 scores 73 vs 59 on handling.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 scores 72 vs 62 on wet.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 scores 70 vs 61 on dry.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 scores 72 vs 64 on comfort.
Tire A · Yokohama A.Drive
Tire B · Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
A.Drive or BluEarth Es ES32?
Which is better in the wet, A.Drive or BluEarth Es ES32?
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32, 72 vs 62 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, A.Drive or BluEarth Es ES32?
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32, 70 vs 61 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, A.Drive or BluEarth Es ES32?
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32, 72 vs 64 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, A.Drive or BluEarth Es ES32?
Neither, by our numbers: 65 vs 65 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology