Yokohama Advan Neova AD08 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Yokohama Advan A050 vs Yokohama Advan Neova AD08 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 6 + 31 owner reviews. How we score

Advan Neova AD08 is ahead, 71–62

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Yokohama Advan A050
Tire AYokohama

Advan A050

Summer

Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 55 · 6 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 73

    Dry

    Advan Neova AD08 +2
    75
    Why this score
    SourceAdvan A050Advan Neova AD08
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 71 (est.)≈ 73 (est.)
    Reviews found online7580

    Advan A050: 60% × 70.7 (est.) + 40% × 75.2 = 73

    Advan Neova AD08: 60% × 72.5 (est.) + 40% × 79.7 = 75

    No road tests of dry for Advan A050. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

    No road tests of dry for Advan Neova AD08. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 57

    Wet

    Advan Neova AD08 +12
    69
    Why this score
    SourceAdvan A050Advan Neova AD08
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 60 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online5269

    Advan A050: 60% × 59.7 (est.) + 40% × 51.8 = 57

    Advan Neova AD08: 60% × 69.1 (est.) + 40% × 68.5 = 69

    No road tests of wet for Advan A050. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

    No road tests of wet for Advan Neova AD08. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. –

    Snow

    No comparison
    65
    Why this score
    SourceAdvan A050Advan Neova AD08
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online–61

    Advan Neova AD08: 60% × 67 (est.) + 40% × 61.3 = 65

    No road tests of snow for Advan Neova AD08. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

  4. 64

    Comfort

    Advan Neova AD08 +4
    68
    Why this score
    SourceAdvan A050Advan Neova AD08
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online5967

    Advan A050: 60% × 67.4 (est.) + 40% × 59.3 = 64

    Advan Neova AD08: 60% × 68.7 (est.) + 40% × 66.6 = 68

    No road tests of comfort for Advan A050 or Advan Neova AD08. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. –

    Noise

    No comparison
    67
    Why this score
    SourceAdvan A050Advan Neova AD08
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online–68

    Advan Neova AD08: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 67.8 = 67

    No road tests of noise for Advan Neova AD08. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 47

    Treadwear

    Advan Neova AD08 +16
    63
    Why this score
    SourceAdvan A050Advan Neova AD08
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 56 (est.)≈ 64 (est.)
    Reviews found online3361

    Advan A050: 60% × 55.6 (est.) + 40% × 33.1 = 47

    Advan Neova AD08: 60% × 64.3 (est.) + 40% × 61.2 = 63

    No road tests of treadwear for Advan A050. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

    No road tests of treadwear for Advan Neova AD08. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 73

    Handling (owners)

    Advan Neova AD08 +6
    79
    Why this score
    SourceAdvan A050Advan Neova AD08
    Reviews found online7379
Scores at a glance
Yokohama Advan A050 vs Yokohama Advan Neova AD08: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryYokohama Advan A050Yokohama Advan Neova AD08
Relative Score 62 71
Dry 73 75
Wet 57 69
Snow – 65
Comfort 64 68
Noise – 67
Treadwear 47 63
Handling (owners) 73 79

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Advan A050

Advan Neova AD08

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Advan A050

Pros

  • Exceptional dry grip and track-day performance
  • Predictable and communicative handling characteristics
  • Consistent grip levels maintained throughout the tire's life

Cons

  • Very high price point compared to competitors
  • Rapid tread wear, particularly in softer compounds
  • Poor performance and safety risks in wet or cold conditions
All owner themes in the Advan A050 review

Tire B Advan Neova AD08

Pros

  • Phenomenal dry grip and cornering traction
  • Exceptional steering feedback and crisp response
  • Stiff, robust sidewall and carcass construction

Cons

  • Prone to overheating and rubber degradation/chunking during heavy track use
  • Reduced performance and aquaplaning tendencies in heavy standing water
  • Limited size availability for larger rims
All owner themes in the Advan Neova AD08 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Yokohama Advan A050 B · Yokohama Advan Neova AD08
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Tread depth—9/32″
UTQG—180 A A
Sidewall—Blackwall
Max pressure—51 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

Yokohama Advan A050

Yokohama Advan Neova AD08

Winner: Yokohama Advan Neova AD08 — better treadwear, wet and handling. It leads or ties in every category we score. Yokohama Advan A050 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 6 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Yokohama Advan Neova AD08 scores 63 vs 47 on treadwear.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Yokohama Advan Neova AD08 scores 69 vs 57 on wet.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Yokohama Advan Neova AD08 scores 79 vs 73 on handling.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Yokohama Advan Neova AD08 scores 68 vs 64 on comfort.

Tire A · Yokohama Advan A050
Tire B · Yokohama Advan Neova AD08

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Advan A050 or Advan Neova AD08?

Which is better in the wet, Advan A050 or Advan Neova AD08?

Yokohama Advan Neova AD08, 69 vs 57 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Advan A050 or Advan Neova AD08?

Neither, by our numbers: 73 vs 75 on the dry score, within 3 points.

Which is more comfortable, Advan A050 or Advan Neova AD08?

Yokohama Advan Neova AD08, 68 vs 64 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Advan A050 or Advan Neova AD08?

Yokohama Advan Neova AD08, 63 vs 47 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology