Tests – · none yet Owners 65 · 20 reviews
Yokohama ADVAN A460 vs Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 4 road tests and 20 + 2,189 owner reviews. How we score
ADVAN Fleva V701 leads, 70–66 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 73 · 4 tests Owners 58 · 2,189 reviews
Best test result: #2 of 22 in 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance Summer Tires (tested tread life (miles))
“I just got the Yokohama Advan Fleva V701's and I like them a lot. The turn in is quicker and the feel is better than the Indy 500's that I had before. They feel more solid and less vague.The sidewall seems a bit stiffer, but somehow the ride is not as harsh.”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
66
Dry
ADVAN Fleva V701 +874Why this score
Source ADVAN A460 ADVAN Fleva V701 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests ≈ 67 (est.) 77 Reviews found online 66 69 ADVAN A460: 60% × 66.9 (est.) + 40% × 65.7 = 66
ADVAN Fleva V701: 60% × 77.5 + 40% × 68.5 = 74
No road tests of dry for ADVAN A460. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
-
67
Wet
ADVAN Fleva V701 +168Why this score
Source ADVAN A460 ADVAN Fleva V701 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests ≈ 68 (est.) 70 Reviews found online 66 65 ADVAN A460: 60% × 67.8 (est.) + 40% × 66.3 = 67
ADVAN Fleva V701: 60% × 70 + 40% × 65.2 = 68
No road tests of wet for ADVAN A460. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
-
–
Snow
No comparison34Why this score
Source ADVAN A460 ADVAN Fleva V701 Professional tests (TWG score) – ≈ 50 (est.) Reviews found online – 10 ADVAN Fleva V701: 60% × 50.2 (est.) + 40% × 10.4 = 34
No road tests of snow for ADVAN Fleva V701. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
-
63
Comfort
Level63Why this score
Source ADVAN A460 ADVAN Fleva V701 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 67 (est.) 62 Reviews found online 56 63 ADVAN A460: 60% × 66.9 (est.) + 40% × 56.4 = 63
ADVAN Fleva V701: 60% × 62.5 + 40% × 63.3 = 63
No road tests of comfort for ADVAN A460. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
–
Noise
No comparison70Why this score
Source ADVAN A460 ADVAN Fleva V701 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests – 75 Reviews found online – 62 ADVAN Fleva V701: 60% × 74.7 + 40% × 61.8 = 70
-
66
Treadwear
ADVAN Fleva V701 +369Why this score
Source ADVAN A460 ADVAN Fleva V701 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests ≈ 66 (est.) 74 Reviews found online 67 61 ADVAN A460: 60% × 66 (est.) + 40% × 66.7 = 66
ADVAN Fleva V701: 60% × 74.1 + 40% × 60.8 = 69
No road tests of treadwear for ADVAN A460. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
-
64
Handling (owners)
ADVAN Fleva V701 +771Why this score
Source ADVAN A460 ADVAN Fleva V701 Reviews found online 64 71
Scores at a glance
| Category | Yokohama ADVAN A460 | Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 66 | 70 |
| Dry | 66 | 74 |
| Wet | 67 | 68 |
| Snow | – | 34 |
| Comfort | 63 | 63 |
| Noise | – | 70 |
| Treadwear | 66 | 69 |
| Handling (owners) | 64 | 71 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
ADVAN A460
ADVAN Fleva V701
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A ADVAN A460
Pros
- Exceptional tread life and durability
- Strong dry-weather grip and handling
- Reliable performance as an OEM factory tire
Cons
- Excessive and intrusive road noise
- Inconsistent wet-weather performance
- Tendency for rubber to harden or crack over time
Tire B ADVAN Fleva V701
Pros
- Exceptional dry and wet grip for the price point
- Noticeably quieter and more comfortable than many competing UHP tires
- Precise steering response and good road feedback
Cons
- Faster-than-average tread wear reported by aggressive drivers
- Some complaints regarding soft sidewalls leading to initial turn-in delay or tramlining
- Occasional reports of elevated road noise depending on the vehicle and road surface
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Yokohama ADVAN A460
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701
Community discussions around the Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 primarily consist of prospective buyers asking about daily drivability, treadwear longevity, and value compared to premium alternatives. Those considering or using them note solid availability in smaller or niche wheel sizes and appreciate their accessible price point. The limited direct experiential feedback praises responsive turn-in, stiffer sidewalls, and decent ride comfort compared to rival sporty summer tires.
“I just got the Yokohama Advan Fleva V701's and I like them a lot. The turn in is quicker and the feel is better than the Indy 500's that I had before. They feel more solid and less vague.The sidewall seems a bit stiffer, but somehow the ride is not as harsh.”
“Yokohama advan fleva v701? Currently looking at stock sizes for my 99 MRS and the v701s are the only decent set I can find. I live in Canada and I was planning on ordering them for next week, and just thought to do one more validation check before driving out to Bellingham. Pretty new to picking out my own tires, trying to also stay within 550-600usd or maxish 800-850cad including tax if possible.”
“Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 in 2026 Do they make sense today? I’d put them on a hatchback (1300kg) and I usually drive up to 180-200 km/h with quick accelerations and curves in my daily. Weather is usually sunny, but sometimes it rains. Are them still a safe and a good choice, or are there some other brands that should result better for my driving style (and for my 215/45 r18 rims)? Thanks in advance.”
Based on 22 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Yokohama ADVAN A460 | B · Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 2 | 70 |
| Rim diameters | 16″ | 15″ – 20″ |
| Tread depth | — | 9/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 300 A A |
| Sidewall | — | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | — | 51 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
Yokohama ADVAN A460
Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701
Narrow edge: Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 — better dry, handling and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 scores 74 vs 66 on dry.
Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 scores 71 vs 64 on handling.
Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 scores 69 vs 66 on treadwear.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
ADVAN A460 or ADVAN Fleva V701?
Which is better in the wet, ADVAN A460 or ADVAN Fleva V701?
Neither, by our numbers: 67 vs 68 on the wet score, within 3 points.
Which grips better on dry roads, ADVAN A460 or ADVAN Fleva V701?
Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701, 74 vs 66 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, ADVAN A460 or ADVAN Fleva V701?
Neither, by our numbers: 63 vs 63 on the comfort score, within 3 points.
Which lasts longer, ADVAN A460 or ADVAN Fleva V701?
Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701, 69 vs 66 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology