Head-to-head Updated

Yokohama ADVAN A460 vs Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 4 road tests and 20 + 2,189 owner reviews. How we score

ADVAN Fleva V701 leads, 70–66 Narrow edge

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701
Tire BYokohama

ADVAN Fleva V701

Summer

Tests 73 · 4 tests Owners 58 · 2,189 reviews

Best test result: #2 of 22 in 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance Summer Tires (tested tread life (miles))

“I just got the Yokohama Advan Fleva V701's and I like them a lot. The turn in is quicker and the feel is better than the Indy 500's that I had before. They feel more solid and less vague.The sidewall seems a bit stiffer, but somehow the ride is not as harsh.”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 66

    Dry

    ADVAN Fleva V701 +8
    74
    Why this score
    SourceADVAN A460ADVAN Fleva V701
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests≈ 67 (est.)77
    Reviews found online6669

    ADVAN A460: 60% × 66.9 (est.) + 40% × 65.7 = 66

    ADVAN Fleva V701: 60% × 77.5 + 40% × 68.5 = 74

    No road tests of dry for ADVAN A460. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 67

    Wet

    ADVAN Fleva V701 +1
    68
    Why this score
    SourceADVAN A460ADVAN Fleva V701
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests≈ 68 (est.)70
    Reviews found online6665

    ADVAN A460: 60% × 67.8 (est.) + 40% × 66.3 = 67

    ADVAN Fleva V701: 60% × 70 + 40% × 65.2 = 68

    No road tests of wet for ADVAN A460. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. –

    Snow

    No comparison
    34
    Why this score
    SourceADVAN A460ADVAN Fleva V701
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 50 (est.)
    Reviews found online–10

    ADVAN Fleva V701: 60% × 50.2 (est.) + 40% × 10.4 = 34

    No road tests of snow for ADVAN Fleva V701. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

  4. 63

    Comfort

    Level
    63
    Why this score
    SourceADVAN A460ADVAN Fleva V701
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 67 (est.)62
    Reviews found online5663

    ADVAN A460: 60% × 66.9 (est.) + 40% × 56.4 = 63

    ADVAN Fleva V701: 60% × 62.5 + 40% × 63.3 = 63

    No road tests of comfort for ADVAN A460. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. –

    Noise

    No comparison
    70
    Why this score
    SourceADVAN A460ADVAN Fleva V701
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests–75
    Reviews found online–62

    ADVAN Fleva V701: 60% × 74.7 + 40% × 61.8 = 70

  6. 66

    Treadwear

    ADVAN Fleva V701 +3
    69
    Why this score
    SourceADVAN A460ADVAN Fleva V701
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests≈ 66 (est.)74
    Reviews found online6761

    ADVAN A460: 60% × 66 (est.) + 40% × 66.7 = 66

    ADVAN Fleva V701: 60% × 74.1 + 40% × 60.8 = 69

    No road tests of treadwear for ADVAN A460. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 64

    Handling (owners)

    ADVAN Fleva V701 +7
    71
    Why this score
    SourceADVAN A460ADVAN Fleva V701
    Reviews found online6471
Scores at a glance
Yokohama ADVAN A460 vs Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryYokohama ADVAN A460Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701
Relative Score 66 70
Dry 66 74
Wet 67 68
Snow – 34
Comfort 63 63
Noise – 70
Treadwear 66 69
Handling (owners) 64 71

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

ADVAN A460

ADVAN Fleva V701

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A ADVAN A460

Pros

  • Exceptional tread life and durability
  • Strong dry-weather grip and handling
  • Reliable performance as an OEM factory tire

Cons

  • Excessive and intrusive road noise
  • Inconsistent wet-weather performance
  • Tendency for rubber to harden or crack over time
All owner themes in the ADVAN A460 review

Tire B ADVAN Fleva V701

Pros

  • Exceptional dry and wet grip for the price point
  • Noticeably quieter and more comfortable than many competing UHP tires
  • Precise steering response and good road feedback

Cons

  • Faster-than-average tread wear reported by aggressive drivers
  • Some complaints regarding soft sidewalls leading to initial turn-in delay or tramlining
  • Occasional reports of elevated road noise depending on the vehicle and road surface
All owner themes in the ADVAN Fleva V701 review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Yokohama ADVAN A460

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Tire B

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701

Neutral

Community discussions around the Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 primarily consist of prospective buyers asking about daily drivability, treadwear longevity, and value compared to premium alternatives. Those considering or using them note solid availability in smaller or niche wheel sizes and appreciate their accessible price point. The limited direct experiential feedback praises responsive turn-in, stiffer sidewalls, and decent ride comfort compared to rival sporty summer tires.

Top themes
#daily driving suitability#treadwear and lifespan#budget summer performance#comparison to Michelin#steering feel and turn-in#wheel sizing availability

Based on 22 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Yokohama ADVAN A460 B · Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available270
Rim diameters16″15″ – 20″
Tread depth—9/32″
UTQG—300 A A
Sidewall—Blackwall
Max pressure—51 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

Yokohama ADVAN A460

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701

Narrow edge: Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 — better dry, handling and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 scores 74 vs 66 on dry.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 scores 71 vs 64 on handling.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 scores 69 vs 66 on treadwear.

Tire A · Yokohama ADVAN A460
Tire B · Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

ADVAN A460 or ADVAN Fleva V701?

Which is better in the wet, ADVAN A460 or ADVAN Fleva V701?

Neither, by our numbers: 67 vs 68 on the wet score, within 3 points.

Which grips better on dry roads, ADVAN A460 or ADVAN Fleva V701?

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701, 74 vs 66 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, ADVAN A460 or ADVAN Fleva V701?

Neither, by our numbers: 63 vs 63 on the comfort score, within 3 points.

Which lasts longer, ADVAN A460 or ADVAN Fleva V701?

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701, 69 vs 66 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology