tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Yokohama ADVAN A460 vs Yokohama C Drive2 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 20 + 31 owner reviews. How we score

ADVAN A460 leads, 66–64 Narrow edge

Check price on Amazon · ADVAN A460 or C Drive2 on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Yokohama C Drive2
Tire BYokohama

C Drive2

Summer

Tests – · none yet Owners 62 · 31 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 66

    Dry

    ADVAN A460 +3
    63
    Why this score
    SourceADVAN A460C Drive2
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 65 (est.)
    Reviews found online6661

    ADVAN A460: 60% × 66.9 (est.) + 40% × 65.7 = 66

    C Drive2: 60% × 65 (est.) + 40% × 61 = 63

    No road tests of dry for ADVAN A460. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

    No road tests of dry for C Drive2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 67

    Wet

    Level
    67
    Why this score
    SourceADVAN A460C Drive2
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online6666

    ADVAN A460: 60% × 67.8 (est.) + 40% × 66.3 = 67

    C Drive2: 60% × 67.6 (est.) + 40% × 65.8 = 67

    No road tests of wet for ADVAN A460. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

    No road tests of wet for C Drive2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 63

    Comfort

    C Drive2 +5
    68
    Why this score
    SourceADVAN A460C Drive2
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online5666

    ADVAN A460: 60% × 66.9 (est.) + 40% × 56.4 = 63

    C Drive2: 60% × 68.6 (est.) + 40% × 66.1 = 68

    No road tests of comfort for ADVAN A460 or C Drive2. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  4. 66

    Treadwear

    ADVAN A460 +4
    62
    Why this score
    SourceADVAN A460C Drive2
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 64 (est.)
    Reviews found online6760

    ADVAN A460: 60% × 66 (est.) + 40% × 66.7 = 66

    C Drive2: 60% × 63.9 (est.) + 40% × 59.9 = 62

    No road tests of treadwear for ADVAN A460. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

    No road tests of treadwear for C Drive2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  5. 64

    Handling (owners)

    ADVAN A460 +3
    61
    Why this score
    SourceADVAN A460C Drive2
    Reviews found online6461
Scores at a glance
CategoryYokohama ADVAN A460Yokohama C Drive2
Relative Score 66 64
Dry 66 63
Wet 67 67
Comfort 63 68
Treadwear 66 62
Handling (owners) 64 61

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

ADVAN A460

C Drive2

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A ADVAN A460

Pros

  • Exceptional tread life and durability
  • Strong dry-weather grip and handling
  • Reliable performance as an OEM factory tire

Cons

  • Excessive and intrusive road noise
  • Inconsistent wet-weather performance
  • Tendency for rubber to harden or crack over time
All owner themes in the ADVAN A460 review

Tire B C Drive2

Pros

  • Exceptional ride comfort and vibration damping
  • Low road noise levels
  • Strong wet weather performance for most users

Cons

  • Inconsistent tread life, with some users reporting rapid wear
  • Handling can feel vague or lack feedback for performance-oriented drivers
  • Sudden loss of grip at the limit
All owner themes in the C Drive2 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Yokohama ADVAN A460 B · Yokohama C Drive2
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available23
Rim diameters16″16″ – 18″

Which one should you actually buy?

Yokohama ADVAN A460

Yokohama C Drive2

Narrow edge: Yokohama ADVAN A460 — better treadwear and dry. Pick the Yokohama C Drive2 if comfort matters most to you.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Yokohama C Drive2 scores 68 vs 63 on comfort.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Yokohama ADVAN A460 scores 66 vs 62 on treadwear.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Yokohama ADVAN A460 scores 66 vs 63 on dry.

Tire A · Yokohama ADVAN A460
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Yokohama C Drive2
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

ADVAN A460 or C Drive2?

Which is better in the wet, ADVAN A460 or C Drive2?

Neither, by our numbers: 67 vs 67 on the wet score, within 3 points.

Which grips better on dry roads, ADVAN A460 or C Drive2?

Yokohama ADVAN A460, 66 vs 63 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, ADVAN A460 or C Drive2?

Yokohama C Drive2, 68 vs 63 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, ADVAN A460 or C Drive2?

Yokohama ADVAN A460, 66 vs 62 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology