Tests – · none yet Owners 62 · 31 reviews
Yokohama C Drive2 vs Michelin Primacy 4+ — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 10 road tests and 31 + 39 owner reviews. How we score
Primacy 4+ is ahead, 78–64
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 83 · 10 tests Owners 72 · 39 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 16 in 2024 ADAC Summer Tyre Test (abrasion)
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
63
Dry
Primacy 4+ +1578Why this score
Source C Drive2 Primacy 4+ Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 9 tests ≈ 65 (est.) 82 Reviews found online 61 72 C Drive2: 60% × 65 (est.) + 40% × 61 = 63
Primacy 4+: 60% × 81.9 + 40% × 71.8 = 78
No road tests of dry for C Drive2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
-
67
Wet
Primacy 4+ +1279Why this score
Source C Drive2 Primacy 4+ Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 9 tests ≈ 68 (est.) 82 Reviews found online 66 75 C Drive2: 60% × 67.6 (est.) + 40% × 65.8 = 67
Primacy 4+: 60% × 81.7 + 40% × 75.4 = 79
No road tests of wet for C Drive2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
-
68
Comfort
Primacy 4+ +573Why this score
Source C Drive2 Primacy 4+ Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 69 (est.) 73 Reviews found online 66 72 C Drive2: 60% × 68.6 (est.) + 40% × 66.1 = 68
Primacy 4+: 60% × 73.2 + 40% × 71.7 = 73
No road tests of comfort for C Drive2. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
–
Noise
No comparison73Why this score
Source C Drive2 Primacy 4+ Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 7 tests – 77 Reviews found online – ≈ 67 (est.) Primacy 4+: 60% × 76.5 + 40% × 67.3 (est.) = 73
No owner ratings of noise for Primacy 4+. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
-
62
Treadwear
Primacy 4+ +2082Why this score
Source C Drive2 Primacy 4+ Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 4 tests ≈ 64 (est.) 90 Reviews found online 60 70 C Drive2: 60% × 63.9 (est.) + 40% × 59.9 = 62
Primacy 4+: 60% × 89.8 + 40% × 70.3 = 82
No road tests of treadwear for C Drive2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
-
61
Handling (owners)
Primacy 4+ +768Why this score
Source C Drive2 Primacy 4+ Reviews found online 61 68
Scores at a glance
| Category | Yokohama C Drive2 | Michelin Primacy 4+ |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 64 | 78 |
| Dry | 63 | 78 |
| Wet | 67 | 79 |
| Comfort | 68 | 73 |
| Noise | – | 73 |
| Treadwear | 62 | 82 |
| Handling (owners) | 61 | 68 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
C Drive2
Primacy 4+
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | C Drive2 | Primacy 4+ | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #7/10 2015 Auto Bild 215/55 R16 Technical Tyre Test | #4/8 2025 EV Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A C Drive2
Pros
- Exceptional ride comfort and vibration damping
- Low road noise levels
- Strong wet weather performance for most users
Cons
- Inconsistent tread life, with some users reporting rapid wear
- Handling can feel vague or lack feedback for performance-oriented drivers
- Sudden loss of grip at the limit
Tire B Primacy 4+
Pros
- Excellent ride comfort and a smooth, compliant 'limousine-like' feel over bumps
- Strong and reliable grip in both wet and dry conditions, inspiring confidence
- Noticeable improvement in quietness and traction compared to predecessor tires or factory options
Cons
- Loud road noise and a harsh drone on rough or coarse asphalt surfaces
- Soft sidewalls can reduce steering agility and initial responsiveness compared to dedicated sport tires
- High premium price point relative to competitors
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Yokohama C Drive2 | B · Michelin Primacy 4+ |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 3 | 66 |
| Rim diameters | 16″ – 18″ | 16″ – 21″ |
| Sizes in common | 3 | 3 |
Which one should you actually buy?
Yokohama C Drive2
Michelin Primacy 4+
Winner: Michelin Primacy 4+ — better treadwear, dry and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Michelin Primacy 4+ scores 82 vs 62 on treadwear.
Michelin Primacy 4+ scores 78 vs 63 on dry.
Michelin Primacy 4+ scores 79 vs 67 on wet.
Michelin Primacy 4+ scores 68 vs 61 on handling.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
C Drive2 or Primacy 4+?
Which is better in the wet, C Drive2 or Primacy 4+?
Michelin Primacy 4+, 79 vs 67 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, C Drive2 or Primacy 4+?
Michelin Primacy 4+, 78 vs 63 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, C Drive2 or Primacy 4+?
Michelin Primacy 4+, 73 vs 68 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, C Drive2 or Primacy 4+?
Michelin Primacy 4+, 82 vs 62 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology