Tests – · none yet Owners 56 · 37 reviews
Yokohama Advan dB V552 vs Yokohama BluEarth E70 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 37 + 16 owner reviews. How we score
Advan dB V552 leads, 60–58 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 54 · 16 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
59
Dry
Advan dB V552 +257Why this score
Source Advan dB V552 BluEarth E70 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 62 (est.) ≈ 61 (est.) Reviews found online 54 51 Advan dB V552: 60% × 62 (est.) + 40% × 53.5 = 59
BluEarth E70: 60% × 61.1 (est.) + 40% × 51.3 = 57
No road tests of dry for Advan dB V552. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
No road tests of dry for BluEarth E70. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
63
Wet
Advan dB V552 +360Why this score
Source Advan dB V552 BluEarth E70 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 65 (est.) ≈ 63 (est.) Reviews found online 60 56 Advan dB V552: 60% × 64.6 (est.) + 40% × 59.5 = 63
BluEarth E70: 60% × 62.8 (est.) + 40% × 56.3 = 60
No road tests of wet for Advan dB V552. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for BluEarth E70. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
65
Comfort
Advan dB V552 +1550Why this score
Source Advan dB V552 BluEarth E70 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 63 (est.) Reviews found online 64 42 Advan dB V552: 40% × 67.7 (est.) + 60% × 63.7 = 65
BluEarth E70: 40% × 63.2 (est.) + 60% × 41.5 = 50
No road tests of comfort for Advan dB V552. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for BluEarth E70. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
57
Treadwear
BluEarth E70 +562Why this score
Source Advan dB V552 BluEarth E70 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 61 (est.) ≈ 64 (est.) Reviews found online 52 59 Advan dB V552: 60% × 61.2 (est.) + 40% × 51.8 = 57
BluEarth E70: 60% × 63.7 (est.) + 40% × 58.8 = 62
No road tests of treadwear for Advan dB V552. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for BluEarth E70. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
57
Handling (owners)
Advan dB V552 +354Why this score
Source Advan dB V552 BluEarth E70 Reviews found online 57 54
Scores at a glance
| Category | Yokohama Advan dB V552 | Yokohama BluEarth E70 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 60 | 58 |
| Dry | 59 | 57 |
| Wet | 63 | 60 |
| Comfort | 65 | 50 |
| Treadwear | 57 | 62 |
| Handling (owners) | 57 | 54 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Advan dB V552
BluEarth E70
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Advan dB V552
Pros
- Exceptionally quiet and silent operation at various speeds
- High level of ride comfort, effectively absorbing bumps and potholes
- Good grip and sure-footed performance in wet conditions
Cons
- Softer sidewalls can cause a floating sensation or lack of sharpness at higher speeds
- Reduced dry cornering grip when pushed hard, with some tendency to wash out
- Mixed feedback on overall durability, with a few users experiencing faster-than-expected wear
Tire B BluEarth E70
Pros
- Excellent tread life and durability
- Predictable handling in dry conditions
- Strong fuel efficiency and low rolling resistance
Cons
- High levels of cabin noise on various road surfaces
- Harsh ride quality and lack of comfort
- Inconsistent or poor wet-weather traction
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Yokohama Advan dB V552 | B · Yokohama BluEarth E70 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 45 | 4 |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 21″ | 17″ – 18″ |
| Sizes in common | 4 | 4 |
Which one should you actually buy?
Yokohama Advan dB V552
Yokohama BluEarth E70
Narrow edge: Yokohama Advan dB V552 — better comfort and wet. Pick the Yokohama BluEarth E70 if treadwear matters most to you. Yokohama BluEarth E70 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 16 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Yokohama Advan dB V552 scores 65 vs 50 on comfort.
Yokohama BluEarth E70 scores 62 vs 57 on treadwear.
Yokohama Advan dB V552 scores 63 vs 60 on wet.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Advan dB V552 or BluEarth E70?
Which is better in the wet, Advan dB V552 or BluEarth E70?
Yokohama Advan dB V552, 63 vs 60 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Advan dB V552 or BluEarth E70?
Neither, by our numbers: 59 vs 57 on the dry score, within 3 points.
Which is more comfortable, Advan dB V552 or BluEarth E70?
Yokohama Advan dB V552, 65 vs 50 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Advan dB V552 or BluEarth E70?
Yokohama BluEarth E70, 62 vs 57 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology