Tests 69 · 2 tests Owners 69 · 46 reviews
Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD08R vs Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.
ADVAN Neova AD08R leads, 71–70 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 70 · 60 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
76
Dry
ADVAN Neova AD08R +769Why this score
Source ADVAN Neova AD08R BluEarth Es ES32 Professional tests (TWG score) 70 – Reviews found online 83 70 -
69
Wet
BluEarth Es ES32 +372Why this score
Source ADVAN Neova AD08R BluEarth Es ES32 Professional tests (TWG score) 67 – Reviews found online 71 73 -
52
Snow
No comparison–Why this score
Source ADVAN Neova AD08R BluEarth Es ES32 Reviews found online 41 – -
68
Comfort
BluEarth Es ES32 +472Why this score
Source ADVAN Neova AD08R BluEarth Es ES32 Reviews found online 66 74 -
67
Noise
No comparison–Why this score
Source ADVAN Neova AD08R BluEarth Es ES32 Reviews found online 68 – -
64
Treadwear
BluEarth Es ES32 +165Why this score
Source ADVAN Neova AD08R BluEarth Es ES32 Reviews found online 63 65 -
81
Handling
ADVAN Neova AD08R +873Why this score
Source ADVAN Neova AD08R BluEarth Es ES32 Reviews found online 81 73
Scores at a glance
| Category | Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD08R | Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 71 | 70 |
| Dry | 76 | 69 |
| Wet | 69 | 72 |
| Snow | 52 | – |
| Comfort | 68 | 72 |
| Noise | 67 | – |
| Treadwear | 64 | 65 |
| Handling | 81 | 73 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neither tire has a score here yet, so this weight changes nothing.
Neither tire has a score here yet, so this weight changes nothing.
ADVAN Neova AD08R
BluEarth Es ES32
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A ADVAN Neova AD08R
Pros
- Unbeatable dry grip and track performance
- Razor-sharp steering response and exceptional road feedback
- Stiff sidewalls providing precise turn-in and cornering stability
Cons
- High tire noise that can worsen significantly as the tire ages
- Stiff ride quality and compromised overall comfort
- Prone to aquaplaning and reduced traction in standing water or heavy rain
Tire B BluEarth Es ES32
Pros
- Exceptional ride comfort and noise reduction
- Strong value proposition compared to premium brands
- Reliable dry-weather traction and handling
Cons
- Wet-weather grip can become unpredictable as tread depth decreases
- Inconsistent tread life, with some users reporting premature wear
- Sidewalls may be susceptible to damage from severe potholes
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD08R | B · Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 1 | 64 |
| Rim diameters | 19″ | 13″ – 18″ |
| Tread depth | 9/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 200 A A | — |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | — |
| Max pressure | 51 psi | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD08R
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32
Too close to call: Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD08R and Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 are within 2 points overall. Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD08R is stronger on handling and dry. Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 is stronger on comfort and wet.
Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD08R scores 81 vs 73 on handling.
Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD08R scores 76 vs 69 on dry.
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 scores 72 vs 68 on comfort.
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 scores 72 vs 69 on wet.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.