Head-to-head Updated

Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD08RS vs Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 19 road tests and 40 + 3,366 owner reviews. How we score

Ventus S1 evo3 is ahead, 70–61

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Hankook Ventus S1 evo3
Tire BHankook

Ventus S1 evo3

Summer

± 5

Tests 78 · 19 tests Owners 56 · 3,366 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 45 in 2019 Summer 53 Tyre Braking Shootout (wet braking)

“Tire preferences? My MK8 has a little over 18,000 miles now and the stock tires look like they’ve already gone to sh*t? Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 aren’t as good as they advertise? What do you recommend for tires?”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 58

    Dry

    Ventus S1 evo3 +17
    75
    Why this score
    SourceADVAN Neova AD08RSVentus S1 evo3
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 18 tests≈ 61 (est.)86
    Reviews found online5260

    ADVAN Neova AD08RS: 60% × 61.3 (est.) + 40% × 52 = 58

    Ventus S1 evo3: 60% × 85.5 + 40% × 60 = 75

    No road tests of dry for ADVAN Neova AD08RS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 61

    Wet

    Ventus S1 evo3 +20
    81
    Why this score
    SourceADVAN Neova AD08RSVentus S1 evo3
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 18 tests≈ 64 (est.)90
    Reviews found online5868

    ADVAN Neova AD08RS: 60% × 63.7 (est.) + 40% × 58 = 61

    Ventus S1 evo3: 60% × 90.2 + 40% × 67.5 = 81

    No road tests of wet for ADVAN Neova AD08RS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 59

    Comfort

    Level
    59
    Why this score
    SourceADVAN Neova AD08RSVentus S1 evo3
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 4 tests≈ 66 (est.)65
    Reviews found online5456

    ADVAN Neova AD08RS: 40% × 66.3 (est.) + 60% × 53.5 = 59

    Ventus S1 evo3: 40% × 64.7 + 60% × 55.5 = 59

    No road tests of comfort for ADVAN Neova AD08RS. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  4. –

    Noise

    No comparison
    73
    Why this score
    SourceADVAN Neova AD08RSVentus S1 evo3
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 14 tests–77
    Reviews found online–≈ 67 (est.)

    Ventus S1 evo3: 60% × 77.3 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 73

    No owner ratings of noise for Ventus S1 evo3. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  5. 67

    Treadwear

    ADVAN Neova AD08RS +14
    53
    Why this score
    SourceADVAN Neova AD08RSVentus S1 evo3
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 4 tests≈ 66 (est.)61
    Reviews found online6740

    ADVAN Neova AD08RS: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 66.9 = 67

    Ventus S1 evo3: 60% × 60.7 + 40% × 40.3 = 53

    No road tests of treadwear for ADVAN Neova AD08RS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  6. 59

    Handling (owners)

    ADVAN Neova AD08RS +1
    58
    Why this score
    SourceADVAN Neova AD08RSVentus S1 evo3
    Reviews found online5958
  7. –

    Efficiency

    No comparison
    68
    Why this score
    SourceADVAN Neova AD08RSVentus S1 evo3
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 15 tests–68
Scores at a glance
Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD08RS vs Hankook Ventus S1 evo3: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryYokohama ADVAN Neova AD08RSHankook Ventus S1 evo3
Relative Score 61 70
Dry 58 75
Wet 61 81
Comfort 59 59
Noise – 73
Treadwear 67 53
Handling (owners) 59 58
Efficiency – 68

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

ADVAN Neova AD08RS

± 5

Ventus S1 evo3

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A ADVAN Neova AD08RS

Pros

  • Exceptional treadwear longevity and durability
  • Stiff, robust sidewalls providing precise turn-in response
  • Good wet performance and hydroplaning resistance for a sporty tire

Cons

  • Noticeably lower dry grip and higher limits compared to the older AD08R
  • Prone to loud squealing early before reaching true limits
  • Harder compound can feel unpredictable or slippery when cold or in wet conditions
All owner themes in the ADVAN Neova AD08RS review

Tire B Ventus S1 evo3

Pros

  • Exceptional grip and confidence in wet and dry conditions
  • Low road noise and high ride comfort
  • Competitive pricing compared to premium tier-one brands

Cons

  • Faster-than-expected tread wear, particularly on rear axles or heavy vehicles
  • Soft sidewalls leading to reduced steering feedback and precision
  • Vulnerability to sidewall damage or bubbling from potholes
All owner themes in the Ventus S1 evo3 review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD08RS

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Tire B

Hankook Ventus S1 evo3

Mixed

Community sentiment toward the Hankook Ventus S1 Evo 3 is mixed, with users frequently praising its strong dry and wet grip, comfort, and competitive pricing. However, notable drawbacks include relatively fast tread wear, reports of increasing road noise over time, and mixed experiences with OEM specs versus premium competitors like Michelin.

vwvortex.com ·1 upvote ·2025-09-20

“My thoughts with the Hankooks on my '25R vs the Bridgestones on my '23R. Hankooks WAY louder but better ride quality & traction. As far as rotating - I rotate at least every two weeks (off before AutoX and on immediately after - I have dedicated AutoX tires ). I don't even pay attention to what position they're in. Zero issues.”

insideevsforum.com ·5 upvotes ·2022-12-20

“For BMW-approved run flat tires, you should see a symbol that has the letters "RSC" in a circle next to the star symbol. (The "RSC" stands for "Run-flat System Component".) I don't see that symbol on the tire pictured, so it isn't a run flat. Hankook's model number for non-run flat S1 evo 3 tires is K127 whereas the run flat variant is K127B, sometimes referred to as the "SUV version". I only know this because of my quest earlier this year for efficient (yet still sporty) 225/45 R17 summer tires for my aftermarket wheels. In this size, the run flat variant actually has a better rating (B) for rolling resistance than the non-run flat (C) per the Euro tyre labels. This is a rare exception, as run flats are usually less efficient. Note that the non-run flat 205/45 R17 S1 evo 3 has an A rating, which is the most efficient. I haven't seen Euro tyre labels for the run flat variant in that size, but it seems unlikely to me they would have an A rating. As such, I would be surprised if MINI installed them at the factory due to the impact to range--unless they had no other option available due to supply chain constraints.”

r/TyreReviews ·7 upvotes ·2026-01-11

“Which tire should I choose? I’m currently looking for new summer tires, but this time I’m finding it surprisingly difficult to choose. My previous set were Bridgestone T005s, which honestly didn’t impress me much. On my earlier car I’ve driven on Michelin PS4S, Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3, and Pirelli (don’t remember the exact model). The Michelins were by far my favorite — excellent grip and overall a fantastic tire. The Hankooks were above average and perfectly fine, but the Pirellis were a big disappointment. This time I’m considering the following three options: • Michelin Pilot Sport 5 • Continental SportContact 7 • Kumho Ecsta Sport S PS72 If I hadn’t done any research, I would have gone for the Michelins without hesitation. However, after digging a bit deeper, I added the Continentals as a strong competitor, and the Kumhos because they’re significantly cheaper while still getting quite positive reviews. I drive a Cupra Formentor 2.0 AWD with around 430 hp. I never take the car to the track, but I do enjoy sporty driving and quick launches at traffic lights. Now I’m finding the final decision harder than expected. Taking both price and performance into account, which of these three would you recommend? Read more”

Top themes
#Wet and dry grip#Value for money#Road noise levels#Tread wear and longevity#OEM fitments and EV variants#Run-flat identification confusion#Ride comfort

Based on 33 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD08RS B · Hankook Ventus S1 evo3
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available35110
Rim diameters14″ – 19″17″ – 22″
Sizes in common1717

Which one should you actually buy?

Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD08RS

Hankook Ventus S1 evo3

Winner: Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 — better wet and dry. Pick the Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD08RS if treadwear matters most to you.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 scores 81 vs 61 on wet.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 scores 75 vs 58 on dry.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD08RS scores 67 vs 53 on treadwear.

Tire A · Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD08RS
Tire B · Hankook Ventus S1 evo3

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

ADVAN Neova AD08RS or Ventus S1 evo3?

Which is better in the wet, ADVAN Neova AD08RS or Ventus S1 evo3?

Hankook Ventus S1 evo3, 81 vs 61 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, ADVAN Neova AD08RS or Ventus S1 evo3?

Hankook Ventus S1 evo3, 75 vs 58 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, ADVAN Neova AD08RS or Ventus S1 evo3?

Neither, by our numbers: 59 vs 59 on the comfort score, within 3 points.

Which lasts longer, ADVAN Neova AD08RS or Ventus S1 evo3?

Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD08RS, 67 vs 53 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology