Tests – · none yet Owners 59 · 40 reviews
Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD08RS vs Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 19 road tests and 40 + 3,366 owner reviews. How we score
Ventus S1 evo3 is ahead, 70–61
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 78 · 19 tests Owners 56 · 3,366 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 45 in 2019 Summer 53 Tyre Braking Shootout (wet braking)
“Tire preferences? My MK8 has a little over 18,000 miles now and the stock tires look like they’ve already gone to sh*t? Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 aren’t as good as they advertise? What do you recommend for tires?”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
58
Dry
Ventus S1 evo3 +1775Why this score
Source ADVAN Neova AD08RS Ventus S1 evo3 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 18 tests ≈ 61 (est.) 86 Reviews found online 52 60 ADVAN Neova AD08RS: 60% × 61.3 (est.) + 40% × 52 = 58
Ventus S1 evo3: 60% × 85.5 + 40% × 60 = 75
No road tests of dry for ADVAN Neova AD08RS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
61
Wet
Ventus S1 evo3 +2081Why this score
Source ADVAN Neova AD08RS Ventus S1 evo3 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 18 tests ≈ 64 (est.) 90 Reviews found online 58 68 ADVAN Neova AD08RS: 60% × 63.7 (est.) + 40% × 58 = 61
Ventus S1 evo3: 60% × 90.2 + 40% × 67.5 = 81
No road tests of wet for ADVAN Neova AD08RS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
59
Comfort
Level59Why this score
Source ADVAN Neova AD08RS Ventus S1 evo3 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 4 tests ≈ 66 (est.) 65 Reviews found online 54 56 ADVAN Neova AD08RS: 40% × 66.3 (est.) + 60% × 53.5 = 59
Ventus S1 evo3: 40% × 64.7 + 60% × 55.5 = 59
No road tests of comfort for ADVAN Neova AD08RS. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
–
Noise
No comparison73Why this score
Source ADVAN Neova AD08RS Ventus S1 evo3 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 14 tests – 77 Reviews found online – ≈ 67 (est.) Ventus S1 evo3: 60% × 77.3 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 73
No owner ratings of noise for Ventus S1 evo3. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
-
67
Treadwear
ADVAN Neova AD08RS +1453Why this score
Source ADVAN Neova AD08RS Ventus S1 evo3 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 4 tests ≈ 66 (est.) 61 Reviews found online 67 40 ADVAN Neova AD08RS: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 66.9 = 67
Ventus S1 evo3: 60% × 60.7 + 40% × 40.3 = 53
No road tests of treadwear for ADVAN Neova AD08RS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
-
59
Handling (owners)
ADVAN Neova AD08RS +158Why this score
Source ADVAN Neova AD08RS Ventus S1 evo3 Reviews found online 59 58 -
–
Efficiency
No comparison68Why this score
Source ADVAN Neova AD08RS Ventus S1 evo3 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 15 tests – 68
Scores at a glance
| Category | Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD08RS | Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 61 | 70 |
| Dry | 58 | 75 |
| Wet | 61 | 81 |
| Comfort | 59 | 59 |
| Noise | – | 73 |
| Treadwear | 67 | 53 |
| Handling (owners) | 59 | 58 |
| Efficiency | – | 68 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
ADVAN Neova AD08RS
Ventus S1 evo3
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A ADVAN Neova AD08RS
Pros
- Exceptional treadwear longevity and durability
- Stiff, robust sidewalls providing precise turn-in response
- Good wet performance and hydroplaning resistance for a sporty tire
Cons
- Noticeably lower dry grip and higher limits compared to the older AD08R
- Prone to loud squealing early before reaching true limits
- Harder compound can feel unpredictable or slippery when cold or in wet conditions
Tire B Ventus S1 evo3
Pros
- Exceptional grip and confidence in wet and dry conditions
- Low road noise and high ride comfort
- Competitive pricing compared to premium tier-one brands
Cons
- Faster-than-expected tread wear, particularly on rear axles or heavy vehicles
- Soft sidewalls leading to reduced steering feedback and precision
- Vulnerability to sidewall damage or bubbling from potholes
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD08RS
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Hankook Ventus S1 evo3
Community sentiment toward the Hankook Ventus S1 Evo 3 is mixed, with users frequently praising its strong dry and wet grip, comfort, and competitive pricing. However, notable drawbacks include relatively fast tread wear, reports of increasing road noise over time, and mixed experiences with OEM specs versus premium competitors like Michelin.
“My thoughts with the Hankooks on my '25R vs the Bridgestones on my '23R. Hankooks WAY louder but better ride quality & traction. As far as rotating - I rotate at least every two weeks (off before AutoX and on immediately after - I have dedicated AutoX tires ). I don't even pay attention to what position they're in. Zero issues.”
“For BMW-approved run flat tires, you should see a symbol that has the letters "RSC" in a circle next to the star symbol. (The "RSC" stands for "Run-flat System Component".) I don't see that symbol on the tire pictured, so it isn't a run flat. Hankook's model number for non-run flat S1 evo 3 tires is K127 whereas the run flat variant is K127B, sometimes referred to as the "SUV version". I only know this because of my quest earlier this year for efficient (yet still sporty) 225/45 R17 summer tires for my aftermarket wheels. In this size, the run flat variant actually has a better rating (B) for rolling resistance than the non-run flat (C) per the Euro tyre labels. This is a rare exception, as run flats are usually less efficient. Note that the non-run flat 205/45 R17 S1 evo 3 has an A rating, which is the most efficient. I haven't seen Euro tyre labels for the run flat variant in that size, but it seems unlikely to me they would have an A rating. As such, I would be surprised if MINI installed them at the factory due to the impact to range--unless they had no other option available due to supply chain constraints.”
“Which tire should I choose? I’m currently looking for new summer tires, but this time I’m finding it surprisingly difficult to choose. My previous set were Bridgestone T005s, which honestly didn’t impress me much. On my earlier car I’ve driven on Michelin PS4S, Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3, and Pirelli (don’t remember the exact model). The Michelins were by far my favorite — excellent grip and overall a fantastic tire. The Hankooks were above average and perfectly fine, but the Pirellis were a big disappointment. This time I’m considering the following three options: • Michelin Pilot Sport 5 • Continental SportContact 7 • Kumho Ecsta Sport S PS72 If I hadn’t done any research, I would have gone for the Michelins without hesitation. However, after digging a bit deeper, I added the Continentals as a strong competitor, and the Kumhos because they’re significantly cheaper while still getting quite positive reviews. I drive a Cupra Formentor 2.0 AWD with around 430 hp. I never take the car to the track, but I do enjoy sporty driving and quick launches at traffic lights. Now I’m finding the final decision harder than expected. Taking both price and performance into account, which of these three would you recommend? Read more”
Based on 33 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD08RS | B · Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 35 | 110 |
| Rim diameters | 14″ – 19″ | 17″ – 22″ |
| Sizes in common | 17 | 17 |
Which one should you actually buy?
Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD08RS
Hankook Ventus S1 evo3
Winner: Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 — better wet and dry. Pick the Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD08RS if treadwear matters most to you.
Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 scores 81 vs 61 on wet.
Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 scores 75 vs 58 on dry.
Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD08RS scores 67 vs 53 on treadwear.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
ADVAN Neova AD08RS or Ventus S1 evo3?
Which is better in the wet, ADVAN Neova AD08RS or Ventus S1 evo3?
Hankook Ventus S1 evo3, 81 vs 61 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, ADVAN Neova AD08RS or Ventus S1 evo3?
Hankook Ventus S1 evo3, 75 vs 58 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, ADVAN Neova AD08RS or Ventus S1 evo3?
Neither, by our numbers: 59 vs 59 on the comfort score, within 3 points.
Which lasts longer, ADVAN Neova AD08RS or Ventus S1 evo3?
Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD08RS, 67 vs 53 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology