Tests – · none yet Owners 46 · 3 reviews
Yokohama Advan S4 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Yokohama Advan S4 vs Yokohama Advan Sport V103 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 3 + 6 owner reviews. How we score
Advan Sport V103 is ahead, 79–51
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 82 · 6 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
52
Dry
Advan Sport V103 +2880Why this score
Source Advan S4 Advan Sport V103 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 58 (est.) ≈ 75 (est.) Reviews found online 43 87 Advan S4: 60% × 57.6 (est.) + 40% × 42.6 = 52
Advan Sport V103: 60% × 75.3 (est.) + 40% × 86.6 = 80
No road tests of dry for Advan S4. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
No road tests of dry for Advan Sport V103. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
-
44
Wet
Advan Sport V103 +3882Why this score
Source Advan S4 Advan Sport V103 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 50 (est.) ≈ 79 (est.) Reviews found online 35 86 Advan S4: 60% × 50.2 (est.) + 40% × 34.8 = 44
Advan Sport V103: 60% × 78.8 (est.) + 40% × 85.8 = 82
No road tests of wet for Advan S4. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
No road tests of wet for Advan Sport V103. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
-
54
Comfort
Advan Sport V103 +2276Why this score
Source Advan S4 Advan Sport V103 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 64 (est.) ≈ 71 (est.) Reviews found online 40 82 Advan S4: 60% × 64.1 (est.) + 40% × 40 = 54
Advan Sport V103: 60% × 71.4 (est.) + 40% × 82.4 = 76
No road tests of comfort for Advan S4 or Advan Sport V103. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
64
Treadwear
Advan Sport V103 +771Why this score
Source Advan S4 Advan Sport V103 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 65 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 62 74 Advan S4: 60% × 64.6 (est.) + 40% × 62.3 = 64
Advan Sport V103: 60% × 68.2 (est.) + 40% × 74.1 = 71
No road tests of treadwear for Advan S4. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
No road tests of treadwear for Advan Sport V103. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
-
47
Handling (owners)
Advan Sport V103 +3885Why this score
Source Advan S4 Advan Sport V103 Reviews found online 47 85
Scores at a glance
| Category | Yokohama Advan S4 | Yokohama Advan Sport V103 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 51 | 79 |
| Dry | 52 | 80 |
| Wet | 44 | 82 |
| Comfort | 54 | 76 |
| Treadwear | 64 | 71 |
| Handling (owners) | 47 | 85 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Advan S4
Advan Sport V103
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Advan S4
Pros
- Acceptable handling characteristics at very low city speeds
- Responsiveness can be marginally improved by adjusting tire pressure
Cons
- Poor traction and grip in both wet and dry conditions
- Significant lack of performance in snow and winter environments
- Noticeable understeer and sluggish turn-in response
Tire B Advan Sport V103
Pros
- Exceptional dry grip and progressive handling at the limit
- Comfortable ride with low noise levels
- Sharper and more acute steering response
Cons
- Sudden drop-off in performance once the tread reaches its wear limit, particularly on the inside edges
- Limited specific feedback on extreme wet weather limits compared to dry performance
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Yokohama Advan S4 | B · Yokohama Advan Sport V103 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer High Performance tires | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | — | 21 |
| Rim diameters | — | 16″ – 21″ |
Which one should you actually buy?
Yokohama Advan S4
Yokohama Advan Sport V103
Winner: Yokohama Advan Sport V103 — better wet, handling and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score. Yokohama Advan S4 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 3 reviews), so read this result as provisional. Yokohama Advan Sport V103 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 6 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Yokohama Advan Sport V103 scores 82 vs 44 on wet.
Yokohama Advan Sport V103 scores 85 vs 47 on handling.
Yokohama Advan Sport V103 scores 80 vs 52 on dry.
Yokohama Advan Sport V103 scores 76 vs 54 on comfort.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Advan S4 or Advan Sport V103?
Which is better in the wet, Advan S4 or Advan Sport V103?
Yokohama Advan Sport V103, 82 vs 44 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Advan S4 or Advan Sport V103?
Yokohama Advan Sport V103, 80 vs 52 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, Advan S4 or Advan Sport V103?
Yokohama Advan Sport V103, 76 vs 54 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Advan S4 or Advan Sport V103?
Yokohama Advan Sport V103, 71 vs 64 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology