Tests – · none yet Owners 71 · 425 reviews
Yokohama Advan Sport V105S vs Yokohama BluEarth XT AE61 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.
Too close to call: Advan Sport V105S and BluEarth XT AE61 are level at 71.
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 66 · 2 tests Owners 79 · 11 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
72
Dry
BluEarth XT AE61 +375Why this score
Source Advan Sport V105S BluEarth XT AE61 Professional tests (TWG score) – 70 Reviews found online 75 83 -
75
Wet
Advan Sport V105S +273Why this score
Source Advan Sport V105S BluEarth XT AE61 Professional tests (TWG score) – 68 Reviews found online 76 80 -
68
Comfort
Advan Sport V105S +266Why this score
Source Advan Sport V105S BluEarth XT AE61 Professional tests (TWG score) – 65 Reviews found online 67 68 -
–
Noise
No comparison80Why this score
Source Advan Sport V105S BluEarth XT AE61 Professional tests (TWG score) – 89 -
65
Treadwear
Advan Sport V105S +362Why this score
Source Advan Sport V105S BluEarth XT AE61 Professional tests (TWG score) – 53 Reviews found online 65 76 -
72
Handling
BluEarth XT AE61 +880Why this score
Source Advan Sport V105S BluEarth XT AE61 Reviews found online 72 80
Scores at a glance
| Category | Yokohama Advan Sport V105S | Yokohama BluEarth XT AE61 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 71 | 71 |
| Dry | 72 | 75 |
| Wet | 75 | 73 |
| Comfort | 68 | 66 |
| Noise | – | 80 |
| Treadwear | 65 | 62 |
| Handling | 72 | 80 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neither tire has a score here yet, so this weight changes nothing.
Advan Sport V105S
BluEarth XT AE61
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Advan Sport V105S
Pros
- Outstanding dry grip and cornering stability
- Exceptional wet weather performance and resistance to aquaplaning
- Stiff sidewalls providing sharp steering response and direct feedback
Cons
- Shorter tread life or faster-than-average wear noted by some users
- Stiffer sidewall results in a firmer, less plush ride quality
- Occasional reports of elevated road noise depending on vehicle and road surface
Tire B BluEarth XT AE61
Pros
- Excellent grip and braking performance in both wet and dry conditions
- Responsive and sharp steering handling
- High stability during cornering due to rigid sidewall construction
Cons
- Noticeable cabin noise, particularly on aged or rough road surfaces
- Stiff sidewall construction results in a harsh ride on bumpy or unpaved roads
- Comfort levels are highly dependent on road surface quality
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Yokohama Advan Sport V105S | B · Yokohama BluEarth XT AE61 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 2 | 38 |
| Rim diameters | 19″ – 20″ | 16″ – 20″ |
Which one should you actually buy?
Yokohama Advan Sport V105S
Yokohama BluEarth XT AE61
Too close to call: Yokohama Advan Sport V105S and Yokohama BluEarth XT AE61 are within 2 points overall. Yokohama Advan Sport V105S is stronger on treadwear. Yokohama BluEarth XT AE61 is stronger on handling and dry.
Yokohama BluEarth XT AE61 scores 80 vs 72 on handling.
Yokohama Advan Sport V105S scores 65 vs 62 on treadwear.
Yokohama BluEarth XT AE61 scores 75 vs 72 on dry.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.