Yokohama Aspec A349 BluEarth looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Yokohama Aspec A349 BluEarth vs Yokohama AVID ENVigor — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 11 + 72 owner reviews. How we score

AVID ENVigor is ahead, 66–61

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Yokohama AVID ENVigor
Tire BYokohama

AVID ENVigor

All Season High Performance tires

Tests – · none yet Owners 63 · 72 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 59

    Dry

    AVID ENVigor +8
    67
    Why this score
    SourceAspec A349 BluEarthAVID ENVigor
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 62 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online5567

    Aspec A349 BluEarth: 60% × 62.4 (est.) + 40% × 54.5 = 59

    AVID ENVigor: 60% × 67.4 (est.) + 40% × 66.8 = 67

    No road tests of dry for Aspec A349 BluEarth. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

    No road tests of dry for AVID ENVigor. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 59

    Wet

    AVID ENVigor +10
    69
    Why this score
    SourceAspec A349 BluEarthAVID ENVigor
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 62 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online5569

    Aspec A349 BluEarth: 60% × 61.5 (est.) + 40% × 55 = 59

    AVID ENVigor: 60% × 69.1 (est.) + 40% × 68.6 = 69

    No road tests of wet for Aspec A349 BluEarth. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

    No road tests of wet for AVID ENVigor. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. –

    Snow

    No comparison
    58
    Why this score
    SourceAspec A349 BluEarthAVID ENVigor
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 63 (est.)
    Reviews found online–50

    AVID ENVigor: 60% × 63.3 (est.) + 40% × 49.9 = 58

    No road tests of snow for AVID ENVigor. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

  4. 62

    Comfort

    AVID ENVigor +2
    64
    Why this score
    SourceAspec A349 BluEarthAVID ENVigor
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online5460

    Aspec A349 BluEarth: 60% × 66.5 (est.) + 40% × 54.1 = 62

    AVID ENVigor: 60% × 67.5 (est.) + 40% × 59.5 = 64

    No road tests of comfort for Aspec A349 BluEarth or AVID ENVigor. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. –

    Noise

    No comparison
    66
    Why this score
    SourceAspec A349 BluEarthAVID ENVigor
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online–64

    AVID ENVigor: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 64.2 = 66

    No road tests of noise for AVID ENVigor. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 67

    Treadwear

    Aspec A349 BluEarth +4
    63
    Why this score
    SourceAspec A349 BluEarthAVID ENVigor
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 64 (est.)
    Reviews found online6961

    Aspec A349 BluEarth: 60% × 66.5 (est.) + 40% × 68.5 = 67

    AVID ENVigor: 60% × 64.2 (est.) + 40% × 60.9 = 63

    No road tests of treadwear for Aspec A349 BluEarth. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

    No road tests of treadwear for AVID ENVigor. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 61

    Handling (owners)

    AVID ENVigor +1
    62
    Why this score
    SourceAspec A349 BluEarthAVID ENVigor
    Reviews found online6162
Scores at a glance
Yokohama Aspec A349 BluEarth vs Yokohama AVID ENVigor: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryYokohama Aspec A349 BluEarthYokohama AVID ENVigor
Relative Score 61 66
Dry 59 67
Wet 59 69
Snow – 58
Comfort 62 64
Noise – 66
Treadwear 67 63
Handling (owners) 61 62

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Aspec A349 BluEarth

AVID ENVigor

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Aspec A349 BluEarth

Pros

  • Impressive tread life and durability for an OEM tire
  • Quiet and comfortable ride quality
  • Reliable handling and lateral grip in dry conditions

Cons

  • Poor traction and tendency to spin on wet surfaces
  • High price point compared to aftermarket competitors
  • Mediocre cornering ability and grip during aggressive maneuvers
All owner themes in the Aspec A349 BluEarth review

Tire B AVID ENVigor

Pros

  • Smooth and exceptionally quiet ride comfort
  • Great value and competitive pricing
  • Strong dry and wet weather traction and handling

Cons

  • Subpar grip in snow and winter conditions
  • Minor noise reported at specific mid-range speeds by some users
  • Product line has been discontinued by Yokohama, making replacements harder to find
All owner themes in the AVID ENVigor review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Yokohama Aspec A349 BluEarth B · Yokohama AVID ENVigor
CategorySummerAll Season High Performance tires
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Tread depth—10/32″
UTQG—560 A A
Treadwear warranty—60,000 mi
Sidewall—Blackwall
Max pressure—51 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

Yokohama Aspec A349 BluEarth

Yokohama AVID ENVigor

Winner: Yokohama AVID ENVigor — better wet and dry. Pick the Yokohama Aspec A349 BluEarth if treadwear matters most to you. Yokohama Aspec A349 BluEarth rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 11 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Yokohama AVID ENVigor scores 69 vs 59 on wet.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Yokohama AVID ENVigor scores 67 vs 59 on dry.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Yokohama Aspec A349 BluEarth scores 67 vs 63 on treadwear.

Tire A · Yokohama Aspec A349 BluEarth
Tire B · Yokohama AVID ENVigor

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Aspec A349 BluEarth or AVID ENVigor?

Which is better in the wet, Aspec A349 BluEarth or AVID ENVigor?

Yokohama AVID ENVigor, 69 vs 59 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Aspec A349 BluEarth or AVID ENVigor?

Yokohama AVID ENVigor, 67 vs 59 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, Aspec A349 BluEarth or AVID ENVigor?

Neither, by our numbers: 62 vs 64 on the comfort score, within 3 points.

Which lasts longer, Aspec A349 BluEarth or AVID ENVigor?

Yokohama Aspec A349 BluEarth, 67 vs 63 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology