tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Yokohama AVID Ascend vs Bridgestone Ecopia EP422 Plus — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 80 + 24 owner reviews. How we score

AVID Ascend is ahead, 73–48

Check price on Amazon · AVID Ascend or Ecopia EP422 Plus on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Yokohama AVID Ascend
Tire AYokohama

AVID Ascend

Premium Touring All Season tire

± 7

Tests – · none yet Owners 75 · 80 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 73

    Dry

    AVID Ascend +29
    44
    Why this score
    SourceAVID AscendEcopia EP422 Plus
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 71 (est.)≈ 53 (est.)
    Reviews found online7631

    AVID Ascend: 60% × 71.3 (est.) + 40% × 75.8 = 73

    Ecopia EP422 Plus: 60% × 52.6 (est.) + 40% × 31.2 = 44

    No road tests of dry for AVID Ascend. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

    No road tests of dry for Ecopia EP422 Plus. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 77

    Wet

    AVID Ascend +26
    51
    Why this score
    SourceAVID AscendEcopia EP422 Plus
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 76 (est.)≈ 56 (est.)
    Reviews found online8044

    AVID Ascend: 60% × 75.6 (est.) + 40% × 79.5 = 77

    Ecopia EP422 Plus: 60% × 56.1 (est.) + 40% × 44.2 = 51

    No road tests of wet for AVID Ascend. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for Ecopia EP422 Plus. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 68

    Snow

    AVID Ascend +15
    53
    Why this score
    SourceAVID AscendEcopia EP422 Plus
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 60 (est.)
    Reviews found online6642

    AVID Ascend: 60% × 69 (est.) + 40% × 66 = 68

    Ecopia EP422 Plus: 60% × 60 (est.) + 40% × 42 = 53

    No road tests of snow for AVID Ascend. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

    No road tests of snow for Ecopia EP422 Plus. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

  4. 73

    Comfort

    AVID Ascend +27
    46
    Why this score
    SourceAVID AscendEcopia EP422 Plus
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 70 (est.)≈ 63 (est.)
    Reviews found online7535

    AVID Ascend: 40% × 70.2 (est.) + 60% × 75.2 = 73

    Ecopia EP422 Plus: 40% × 63 (est.) + 60% × 35.4 = 46

    No road tests of comfort for AVID Ascend or Ecopia EP422 Plus. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 70

    Noise

    AVID Ascend +14
    56
    Why this score
    SourceAVID AscendEcopia EP422 Plus
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online7641

    AVID Ascend: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 75.8 = 70

    Ecopia EP422 Plus: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 41.2 = 56

    No road tests of noise for AVID Ascend or Ecopia EP422 Plus. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 70

    Treadwear

    AVID Ascend +20
    50
    Why this score
    SourceAVID AscendEcopia EP422 Plus
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 57 (est.)
    Reviews found online7340

    AVID Ascend: 60% × 68.5 (est.) + 40% × 72.9 = 70

    Ecopia EP422 Plus: 60% × 56.8 (est.) + 40% × 39.5 = 50

    No road tests of treadwear for AVID Ascend. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

    No road tests of treadwear for Ecopia EP422 Plus. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  7. 76

    Handling (owners)

    AVID Ascend +41
    35
    Why this score
    SourceAVID AscendEcopia EP422 Plus
    Reviews found online7635
Scores at a glance
CategoryYokohama AVID AscendBridgestone Ecopia EP422 Plus
Relative Score 73 48
Dry 73 44
Wet 77 51
Snow 68 53
Comfort 73 46
Noise 70 56
Treadwear 70 50
Handling (owners) 76 35

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 7

AVID Ascend

± 8

Ecopia EP422 Plus

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A AVID Ascend

Pros

  • Exceptionally low road noise and quiet ride
  • High level of ride comfort and shock absorption
  • Strong wet and dry traction, inspiring confidence in heavy rain

Cons

  • Isolated reports of premature tread wear or not meeting expected mileage
  • Slightly spongy initial feel requiring a brief break-in period
  • Occasional minor wheel slip during hard acceleration in wet or dry conditions
All owner themes in the AVID Ascend review

Tire B Ecopia EP422 Plus

Pros

  • Excellent fuel economy and low rolling resistance
  • Quiet and comfortable ride quality when new
  • Predictable dry and wet traction for conservative daily commuting

Cons

  • Significantly shorter tread life than advertised or expected
  • Develops loud whining, buzzing, and increased noise as the tread wears down
  • Stiff ride quality or harshness over rough pavement and cracks
All owner themes in the Ecopia EP422 Plus review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Yokohama AVID Ascend B · Bridgestone Ecopia EP422 Plus
CategoryPremium Touring All Season tireAll-Season
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available115
Rim diameters17″15″ – 17″
Tread depth12/32″11/32″
UTQG740 A A640 A A
Treadwear warranty75,000 mi70,000 mi
SidewallBlackwallBlackwall
Max pressure51 psi44 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

Yokohama AVID Ascend

Bridgestone Ecopia EP422 Plus

Winner: Yokohama AVID Ascend — better handling, dry and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Yokohama AVID Ascend scores 76 vs 35 on handling.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Yokohama AVID Ascend scores 73 vs 44 on dry.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Yokohama AVID Ascend scores 73 vs 46 on comfort.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Yokohama AVID Ascend scores 77 vs 51 on wet.

Tire A · Yokohama AVID Ascend
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Bridgestone Ecopia EP422 Plus
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

AVID Ascend or Ecopia EP422 Plus?

Which is better in the wet, AVID Ascend or Ecopia EP422 Plus?

Yokohama AVID Ascend, 77 vs 51 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, AVID Ascend or Ecopia EP422 Plus?

Yokohama AVID Ascend, 73 vs 44 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, AVID Ascend or Ecopia EP422 Plus?

Yokohama AVID Ascend, 68 vs 53 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, AVID Ascend or Ecopia EP422 Plus?

Yokohama AVID Ascend, 70 vs 56 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, AVID Ascend or Ecopia EP422 Plus?

Yokohama AVID Ascend, 73 vs 46 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, AVID Ascend or Ecopia EP422 Plus?

Yokohama AVID Ascend, 70 vs 50 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology