Tests – · none yet Owners 75 · 80 reviews
Yokohama AVID Ascend vs Cooper CS5 Grand Touring — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 80 + 776 owner reviews. How we score
Too close to call: AVID Ascend 73, CS5 Grand Touring 74.
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 76 · 776 reviews
“Picky1, Former owner of a 2012 Sienna XLE FWD with the 235/60/17 tires. I tried multiple tires on it (Michelin Primacy MXV4s (OEM), Bridgestone Dueler Ecopia HL 422, Firestone FR710s, Cooper CS5 Grand Touring). The best results came from the Cooper CS5 Grand Touring tires. They took my family through multiple 1,000 mile trips, as well as northeast weather including rain, sleet, snow, and ice. I made some comments in the below thread: The CS5's held strong (and had the best wear of the four brands I tried) until I picked up a 2015 Sienna Limited AWD with the Bridgestone run-flats. Those were replaced with Michelin Defender LTX tires, which are phenomenal. Unfortunately, they do not come in the 235/60/17 size. -Eugene”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
73
Dry
CS5 Grand Touring +477Why this score
Source AVID Ascend CS5 Grand Touring Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 71 (est.) ≈ 74 (est.) Reviews found online 76 82 AVID Ascend: 60% × 71.3 (est.) + 40% × 75.8 = 73
CS5 Grand Touring: 60% × 73.9 (est.) + 40% × 81.9 = 77
No road tests of dry for AVID Ascend. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
No road tests of dry for CS5 Grand Touring. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
77
Wet
Level77Why this score
Source AVID Ascend CS5 Grand Touring Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 76 (est.) ≈ 75 (est.) Reviews found online 80 79 AVID Ascend: 60% × 75.6 (est.) + 40% × 79.5 = 77
CS5 Grand Touring: 60% × 75.4 (est.) + 40% × 79.2 = 77
No road tests of wet for AVID Ascend. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for CS5 Grand Touring. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
68
Snow
AVID Ascend +167Why this score
Source AVID Ascend CS5 Grand Touring Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 66 64 AVID Ascend: 60% × 69 (est.) + 40% × 66 = 68
CS5 Grand Touring: 60% × 68.3 (est.) + 40% × 64.1 = 67
No road tests of snow for AVID Ascend. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
No road tests of snow for CS5 Grand Touring. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
-
73
Comfort
CS5 Grand Touring +174Why this score
Source AVID Ascend CS5 Grand Touring Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 70 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 75 77 AVID Ascend: 40% × 70.2 (est.) + 60% × 75.2 = 73
CS5 Grand Touring: 40% × 70.5 (est.) + 60% × 76.6 = 74
No road tests of comfort for AVID Ascend or CS5 Grand Touring. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
70
Noise
CS5 Grand Touring +272Why this score
Source AVID Ascend CS5 Grand Touring Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 76 81 AVID Ascend: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 75.8 = 70
CS5 Grand Touring: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 80.9 = 72
No road tests of noise for AVID Ascend or CS5 Grand Touring. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
70
Treadwear
Level70Why this score
Source AVID Ascend CS5 Grand Touring Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 73 73 AVID Ascend: 60% × 68.5 (est.) + 40% × 72.9 = 70
CS5 Grand Touring: 60% × 68.4 (est.) + 40% × 72.5 = 70
No road tests of treadwear for AVID Ascend. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
No road tests of treadwear for CS5 Grand Touring. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
-
76
Handling (owners)
AVID Ascend +373Why this score
Source AVID Ascend CS5 Grand Touring Reviews found online 76 73
Scores at a glance
| Category | Yokohama AVID Ascend | Cooper CS5 Grand Touring |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 73 | 74 |
| Dry | 73 | 77 |
| Wet | 77 | 77 |
| Snow | 68 | 67 |
| Comfort | 73 | 74 |
| Noise | 70 | 72 |
| Treadwear | 70 | 70 |
| Handling (owners) | 76 | 73 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
AVID Ascend
CS5 Grand Touring
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A AVID Ascend
Pros
- Exceptionally low road noise and quiet ride
- High level of ride comfort and shock absorption
- Strong wet and dry traction, inspiring confidence in heavy rain
Cons
- Isolated reports of premature tread wear or not meeting expected mileage
- Slightly spongy initial feel requiring a brief break-in period
- Occasional minor wheel slip during hard acceleration in wet or dry conditions
Tire B CS5 Grand Touring
Pros
- Excellent wet and dry traction with strong hydroplaning resistance
- High value for the price compared to premium competitors
- Smooth, comfortable ride quality
Cons
- Some drivers experienced noticeable road noise, particularly on specific lighter vehicles like hybrids
- Mediocre performance in heavy winter snow, ice, or deep mud
- Cornering grip in emergency maneuvers is considered average by some drivers
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Yokohama AVID Ascend
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Cooper CS5 Grand Touring
Community sentiment toward the Cooper CS5 Grand Touring is largely positive, with owners highlighting its smooth ride, low road noise, and reliable all-season traction in rain and light snow. While praised as a strong value compared to premium competitors like Michelin, several users note that treadwear often falls short of the advertised 80,000-mile warranty, particularly on heavier minivans or under high-heat conditions.
“I too was looking for quiet tires when it came time to replace. Have been very happy with COOPER CS5 GRAND TOURING ==> The CS5 has many modern technologies which improve longevity and traction AND they are M+S rated. I run them all year in Vermont and the snow traction is acceptable with Subaru AWD.”
“I have the Cooper cs5 grand touring on my Odyssey and love them. Very quiet and snoot riding. Fwiw, I'm in Southern California so we have little cold/wet weather let alone snow, but they did great when I drove up to Sequoia and had cables on during the snow storm. Much better than the Michelin Defenders I had before.”
“My wife and I have been running Cooper CS5 Grand Touring on Outback and Impreza for many years. (the Outback is on its 2nd set) For us, having a QUIET tire is primary importance... followed closely with winter-traction here in Vermont winters. We do NOT want to have 2nd set of dedicated snow-tires for the winter. The CS5 have met our requirements. At the very least, I would suggest you consider the CS5 Ultra as you make a decision.”
Based on 38 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Yokohama AVID Ascend | B · Cooper CS5 Grand Touring |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Premium Touring All Season tire | All Season Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | SUV and 4x4 |
| Tread depth | 12/32″ | 11 - 12/32″ |
| UTQG | 740 A A | 780 A A |
| Treadwear warranty | 75,000 mi | 80,000 mi |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | Black Side Wall |
| Max pressure | 51 psi | 44 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
Yokohama AVID Ascend
Cooper CS5 Grand Touring
Too close to call: Yokohama AVID Ascend and Cooper CS5 Grand Touring are within 2 points overall. Cooper CS5 Grand Touring is stronger on dry.
Cooper CS5 Grand Touring scores 77 vs 73 on dry.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
AVID Ascend or CS5 Grand Touring?
Which is better in the wet, AVID Ascend or CS5 Grand Touring?
Neither, by our numbers: 77 vs 77 on the wet score, within 3 points.
Which grips better on dry roads, AVID Ascend or CS5 Grand Touring?
Cooper CS5 Grand Touring, 77 vs 73 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, AVID Ascend or CS5 Grand Touring?
Neither, by our numbers: 68 vs 67 on the snow score, within 3 points.
Which is quieter, AVID Ascend or CS5 Grand Touring?
Neither, by our numbers: 70 vs 72 on the noise score, within 3 points.
Which is more comfortable, AVID Ascend or CS5 Grand Touring?
Neither, by our numbers: 73 vs 74 on the comfort score, within 3 points.
Which lasts longer, AVID Ascend or CS5 Grand Touring?
Neither, by our numbers: 70 vs 70 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology