Tests – · none yet Owners 71 · 81 reviews
Yokohama AVID Ascend vs Yokohama AVID Ascend GT — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 81 + 24 owner reviews. How we score
Too close to call: AVID Ascend 70, AVID Ascend GT 69.
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 68 · 24 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
71
Dry
AVID Ascend +170Why this score
Source AVID Ascend AVID Ascend GT Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 70 (est.) ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 73 70 AVID Ascend: 60% × 69.9 (est.) + 40% × 72.6 = 71
AVID Ascend GT: 60% × 69 (est.) + 40% × 70.4 = 70
No road tests of dry for AVID Ascend. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
No road tests of dry for AVID Ascend GT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
75
Wet
AVID Ascend +273Why this score
Source AVID Ascend AVID Ascend GT Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 74 (est.) ≈ 72 (est.) Reviews found online 77 74 AVID Ascend: 60% × 73.9 (est.) + 40% × 76.6 = 75
AVID Ascend GT: 60% × 72.4 (est.) + 40% × 73.8 = 73
No road tests of wet for AVID Ascend. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for AVID Ascend GT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
63
Snow
AVID Ascend GT +164Why this score
Source AVID Ascend AVID Ascend GT Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 58 60 AVID Ascend: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 58.1 = 63
AVID Ascend GT: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 60.3 = 64
No road tests of snow for AVID Ascend. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
No road tests of snow for AVID Ascend GT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
71
Comfort
AVID Ascend +566Why this score
Source AVID Ascend AVID Ascend GT Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 73 65 AVID Ascend: 40% × 69.4 (est.) + 60% × 72.5 = 71
AVID Ascend GT: 40% × 67.9 (est.) + 60% × 64.8 = 66
No road tests of comfort for AVID Ascend. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for AVID Ascend GT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
70
Noise
AVID Ascend +565Why this score
Source AVID Ascend AVID Ascend GT Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 74 64 AVID Ascend: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 74.4 = 70
AVID Ascend GT: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 63.9 = 65
No road tests of noise for AVID Ascend or AVID Ascend GT. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
68
Treadwear
AVID Ascend +266Why this score
Source AVID Ascend AVID Ascend GT Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 68 65 AVID Ascend: 60% × 67.1 (est.) + 40% × 68.2 = 68
AVID Ascend GT: 60% × 66.1 (est.) + 40% × 65.3 = 66
No road tests of treadwear for AVID Ascend. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for AVID Ascend GT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
72
Handling (owners)
No comparison–Why this score
Source AVID Ascend AVID Ascend GT Reviews found online 72 –
Scores at a glance
| Category | Yokohama AVID Ascend | Yokohama AVID Ascend GT |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 70 | 69 |
| Dry | 71 | 70 |
| Wet | 75 | 73 |
| Snow | 63 | 64 |
| Comfort | 71 | 66 |
| Noise | 70 | 65 |
| Treadwear | 68 | 66 |
| Handling (owners) | 72 | – |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
AVID Ascend
AVID Ascend GT
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A AVID Ascend
Pros
- Exceptionally low road noise and quiet ride
- High level of ride comfort and shock absorption
- Strong wet and dry traction, inspiring confidence in heavy rain
Cons
- Isolated reports of premature tread wear or not meeting expected mileage
- Slightly spongy initial feel requiring a brief break-in period
- Occasional minor wheel slip during hard acceleration in wet or dry conditions
Tire B AVID Ascend GT
Pros
- Excellent wet-weather performance: several owners describe confident grip, resistance to hydroplaning, and one calls it the best tire for wet roads they have owned.
- Capable in light winter conditions: reviewers report good handling in slush, rain, and snow, with one saying it grips better than any tire they have owned (no reviewer had yet tested deep snow accumulations).
- Comfortable, smooth, and quiet ride: multiple owners cite a noticeable improvement in ride quality and noise over previous or factory tires.
Cons
- Treadwear is an open question: most reviewers have only 1,000–2,500 miles, and one reported front tires worn out after six months while the rears looked new.
- Some road noise reported: one reviewer noted more tread noise on dry pavement and another called the tire a little loud, contrary to the quiet-ride praise elsewhere.
- Ride quality complaints from a minority: one reviewer said the tire drives rough.
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Yokohama AVID Ascend | B · Yokohama AVID Ascend GT |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season | All Season |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 1 | 58 |
| Rim diameters | 17″ | 15″ – 20″ |
| Tread depth | 12/32″ | 12/32″ |
| UTQG | 740 A A | 740 A A |
| Treadwear warranty | 75,000 mi | 65,000 mi |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | 51 psi | 51 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
Yokohama AVID Ascend
Yokohama AVID Ascend GT
Too close to call: Yokohama AVID Ascend and Yokohama AVID Ascend GT are within 2 points overall. Yokohama AVID Ascend is stronger on comfort and noise.
Yokohama AVID Ascend scores 71 vs 66 on comfort.
Yokohama AVID Ascend scores 70 vs 65 on noise.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
AVID Ascend or AVID Ascend GT?
Which is better in the wet, AVID Ascend or AVID Ascend GT?
Neither, by our numbers: 75 vs 73 on the wet score, within 3 points.
Which grips better on dry roads, AVID Ascend or AVID Ascend GT?
Neither, by our numbers: 71 vs 70 on the dry score, within 3 points.
Which is better in snow, AVID Ascend or AVID Ascend GT?
Neither, by our numbers: 63 vs 64 on the snow score, within 3 points.
Which is quieter, AVID Ascend or AVID Ascend GT?
Yokohama AVID Ascend, 70 vs 65 on our noise score.
Which is more comfortable, AVID Ascend or AVID Ascend GT?
Yokohama AVID Ascend, 71 vs 66 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, AVID Ascend or AVID Ascend GT?
Neither, by our numbers: 68 vs 66 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology