Head-to-head Updated

Yokohama AVID Ascend vs Yokohama AVID Ascend LX — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 1 road tests and 81 + 35 owner reviews. How we score

Too close to call: AVID Ascend 70, AVID Ascend LX 71.

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 71

    Dry

    AVID Ascend LX +3
    74
    Why this score
    SourceAVID AscendAVID Ascend LX
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 70 (est.)≈ 72 (est.)
    Reviews found online7378

    AVID Ascend: 60% × 69.9 (est.) + 40% × 72.6 = 71

    AVID Ascend LX: 60% × 72 (est.) + 40% × 77.6 = 74

    No road tests of dry for AVID Ascend. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

    No road tests of dry for AVID Ascend LX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 75

    Wet

    AVID Ascend +2
    73
    Why this score
    SourceAVID AscendAVID Ascend LX
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 74 (est.)≈ 73 (est.)
    Reviews found online7775

    AVID Ascend: 60% × 74 (est.) + 40% × 76.6 = 75

    AVID Ascend LX: 60% × 72.8 (est.) + 40% × 74.5 = 73

    No road tests of wet for AVID Ascend. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for AVID Ascend LX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 63

    Snow

    AVID Ascend LX +2
    65
    Why this score
    SourceAVID AscendAVID Ascend LX
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online5861

    AVID Ascend: 60% × 66.5 (est.) + 40% × 58 = 63

    AVID Ascend LX: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 60.5 = 65

    No road tests of snow for AVID Ascend. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

    No road tests of snow for AVID Ascend LX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 71

    Comfort

    AVID Ascend LX +1
    72
    Why this score
    SourceAVID AscendAVID Ascend LX
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 70 (est.)≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online7374

    AVID Ascend: 40% × 69.5 (est.) + 60% × 72.5 = 71

    AVID Ascend LX: 40% × 69.9 (est.) + 60% × 74.1 = 72

    No road tests of comfort for AVID Ascend. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

    No road tests of comfort for AVID Ascend LX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. 69

    Noise

    AVID Ascend +1
    68
    Why this score
    SourceAVID AscendAVID Ascend LX
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 66 (est.)63
    Reviews found online7476

    AVID Ascend: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 74.1 = 69

    AVID Ascend LX: 60% × 62.5 + 40% × 75.7 = 68

    No road tests of noise for AVID Ascend. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 68

    Treadwear

    AVID Ascend LX +3
    71
    Why this score
    SourceAVID AscendAVID Ascend LX
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online6875

    AVID Ascend: 60% × 67.1 (est.) + 40% × 68.2 = 68

    AVID Ascend LX: 60% × 69.4 (est.) + 40% × 74.6 = 71

    No road tests of treadwear for AVID Ascend. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

    No road tests of treadwear for AVID Ascend LX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 72

    Handling (owners)

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceAVID AscendAVID Ascend LX
    Reviews found online72–
Scores at a glance
Yokohama AVID Ascend vs Yokohama AVID Ascend LX: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryYokohama AVID AscendYokohama AVID Ascend LX
Relative Score 70 71
Dry 71 74
Wet 75 73
Snow 63 65
Comfort 71 72
Noise 69 68
Treadwear 68 71
Handling (owners) 72 –

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 7

AVID Ascend

± 8

AVID Ascend LX

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A AVID Ascend

Pros

  • Exceptionally low road noise and quiet ride
  • High level of ride comfort and shock absorption
  • Strong wet and dry traction, inspiring confidence in heavy rain

Cons

  • Isolated reports of premature tread wear or not meeting expected mileage
  • Slightly spongy initial feel requiring a brief break-in period
  • Occasional minor wheel slip during hard acceleration in wet or dry conditions
All owner themes in the AVID Ascend review

Tire B AVID Ascend LX

Pros

  • Exceptional treadlife with reports of high mileage remaining even after tens of thousands of miles
  • Smooth and exceptionally comfortable ride quality
  • Low road noise at highway speeds

Cons

  • A few users experienced poor wet weather performance and dangerous hydroplaning
  • Isolated reports of rapid, uneven front tire wear
  • Slightly higher road noise noted by a minority of drivers compared to previous sets
All owner themes in the AVID Ascend LX review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Yokohama AVID Ascend B · Yokohama AVID Ascend LX
CategoryAll SeasonAll Season
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available139
Rim diameters17″15″ – 18″
Tread depth12/32″11/32″
UTQG740 A A800 A A
Treadwear warranty75,000 mi85,000 mi
SidewallBlackwallBlackwall
Max pressure51 psi51 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

Yokohama AVID Ascend

Yokohama AVID Ascend LX

Too close to call: Yokohama AVID Ascend and Yokohama AVID Ascend LX are within 2 points overall. Yokohama AVID Ascend LX is stronger on dry and treadwear.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Yokohama AVID Ascend LX scores 74 vs 71 on dry.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Yokohama AVID Ascend LX scores 71 vs 68 on treadwear.

Tire A · Yokohama AVID Ascend
Tire B · Yokohama AVID Ascend LX

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

AVID Ascend or AVID Ascend LX?

Which is better in the wet, AVID Ascend or AVID Ascend LX?

Neither, by our numbers: 75 vs 73 on the wet score, within 3 points.

Which grips better on dry roads, AVID Ascend or AVID Ascend LX?

Yokohama AVID Ascend LX, 74 vs 71 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, AVID Ascend or AVID Ascend LX?

Neither, by our numbers: 63 vs 65 on the snow score, within 3 points.

Which is quieter, AVID Ascend or AVID Ascend LX?

Neither, by our numbers: 69 vs 68 on the noise score, within 3 points.

Which is more comfortable, AVID Ascend or AVID Ascend LX?

Neither, by our numbers: 71 vs 72 on the comfort score, within 3 points.

Which lasts longer, AVID Ascend or AVID Ascend LX?

Yokohama AVID Ascend LX, 71 vs 68 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology