Tests – · none yet Owners 71 · 81 reviews
Yokohama AVID Ascend vs Yokohama AVID Ascend LX — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 1 road tests and 81 + 35 owner reviews. How we score
Too close to call: AVID Ascend 70, AVID Ascend LX 71.
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · 1 test Owners 73 · 35 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
71
Dry
AVID Ascend LX +374Why this score
Source AVID Ascend AVID Ascend LX Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 70 (est.) ≈ 72 (est.) Reviews found online 73 78 AVID Ascend: 60% × 69.9 (est.) + 40% × 72.6 = 71
AVID Ascend LX: 60% × 72 (est.) + 40% × 77.6 = 74
No road tests of dry for AVID Ascend. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
No road tests of dry for AVID Ascend LX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
75
Wet
AVID Ascend +273Why this score
Source AVID Ascend AVID Ascend LX Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 74 (est.) ≈ 73 (est.) Reviews found online 77 75 AVID Ascend: 60% × 74 (est.) + 40% × 76.6 = 75
AVID Ascend LX: 60% × 72.8 (est.) + 40% × 74.5 = 73
No road tests of wet for AVID Ascend. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for AVID Ascend LX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
63
Snow
AVID Ascend LX +265Why this score
Source AVID Ascend AVID Ascend LX Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 58 61 AVID Ascend: 60% × 66.5 (est.) + 40% × 58 = 63
AVID Ascend LX: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 60.5 = 65
No road tests of snow for AVID Ascend. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
No road tests of snow for AVID Ascend LX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
71
Comfort
AVID Ascend LX +172Why this score
Source AVID Ascend AVID Ascend LX Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 70 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 73 74 AVID Ascend: 40% × 69.5 (est.) + 60% × 72.5 = 71
AVID Ascend LX: 40% × 69.9 (est.) + 60% × 74.1 = 72
No road tests of comfort for AVID Ascend. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for AVID Ascend LX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
69
Noise
AVID Ascend +168Why this score
Source AVID Ascend AVID Ascend LX Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 66 (est.) 63 Reviews found online 74 76 AVID Ascend: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 74.1 = 69
AVID Ascend LX: 60% × 62.5 + 40% × 75.7 = 68
No road tests of noise for AVID Ascend. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
68
Treadwear
AVID Ascend LX +371Why this score
Source AVID Ascend AVID Ascend LX Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 68 75 AVID Ascend: 60% × 67.1 (est.) + 40% × 68.2 = 68
AVID Ascend LX: 60% × 69.4 (est.) + 40% × 74.6 = 71
No road tests of treadwear for AVID Ascend. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for AVID Ascend LX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
72
Handling (owners)
No comparison–Why this score
Source AVID Ascend AVID Ascend LX Reviews found online 72 –
Scores at a glance
| Category | Yokohama AVID Ascend | Yokohama AVID Ascend LX |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 70 | 71 |
| Dry | 71 | 74 |
| Wet | 75 | 73 |
| Snow | 63 | 65 |
| Comfort | 71 | 72 |
| Noise | 69 | 68 |
| Treadwear | 68 | 71 |
| Handling (owners) | 72 | – |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
AVID Ascend
AVID Ascend LX
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A AVID Ascend
Pros
- Exceptionally low road noise and quiet ride
- High level of ride comfort and shock absorption
- Strong wet and dry traction, inspiring confidence in heavy rain
Cons
- Isolated reports of premature tread wear or not meeting expected mileage
- Slightly spongy initial feel requiring a brief break-in period
- Occasional minor wheel slip during hard acceleration in wet or dry conditions
Tire B AVID Ascend LX
Pros
- Exceptional treadlife with reports of high mileage remaining even after tens of thousands of miles
- Smooth and exceptionally comfortable ride quality
- Low road noise at highway speeds
Cons
- A few users experienced poor wet weather performance and dangerous hydroplaning
- Isolated reports of rapid, uneven front tire wear
- Slightly higher road noise noted by a minority of drivers compared to previous sets
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Yokohama AVID Ascend | B · Yokohama AVID Ascend LX |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season | All Season |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 1 | 39 |
| Rim diameters | 17″ | 15″ – 18″ |
| Tread depth | 12/32″ | 11/32″ |
| UTQG | 740 A A | 800 A A |
| Treadwear warranty | 75,000 mi | 85,000 mi |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | 51 psi | 51 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
Yokohama AVID Ascend
Yokohama AVID Ascend LX
Too close to call: Yokohama AVID Ascend and Yokohama AVID Ascend LX are within 2 points overall. Yokohama AVID Ascend LX is stronger on dry and treadwear.
Yokohama AVID Ascend LX scores 74 vs 71 on dry.
Yokohama AVID Ascend LX scores 71 vs 68 on treadwear.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
AVID Ascend or AVID Ascend LX?
Which is better in the wet, AVID Ascend or AVID Ascend LX?
Neither, by our numbers: 75 vs 73 on the wet score, within 3 points.
Which grips better on dry roads, AVID Ascend or AVID Ascend LX?
Yokohama AVID Ascend LX, 74 vs 71 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, AVID Ascend or AVID Ascend LX?
Neither, by our numbers: 63 vs 65 on the snow score, within 3 points.
Which is quieter, AVID Ascend or AVID Ascend LX?
Neither, by our numbers: 69 vs 68 on the noise score, within 3 points.
Which is more comfortable, AVID Ascend or AVID Ascend LX?
Neither, by our numbers: 71 vs 72 on the comfort score, within 3 points.
Which lasts longer, AVID Ascend or AVID Ascend LX?
Yokohama AVID Ascend LX, 71 vs 68 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology