Tests – · none yet Owners 70 · 6 reviews
Yokohama AVS dB v550 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Yokohama AVS dB v550 vs Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 6 + 60 owner reviews. How we score
Too close to call: AVS dB v550 70, BluEarth Es ES32 71.
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 71 · 60 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
71
Dry
AVS dB v550 +170Why this score
Source AVS dB v550 BluEarth Es ES32 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 70 (est.) ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 73 71 AVS dB v550: 60% × 70.2 (est.) + 40% × 73.1 = 71
BluEarth Es ES32: 60% × 69.3 (est.) + 40% × 71 = 70
No road tests of dry for AVS dB v550. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
No road tests of dry for BluEarth Es ES32. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
72
Wet
BluEarth Es ES32 +274Why this score
Source AVS dB v550 BluEarth Es ES32 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 72 (est.) ≈ 73 (est.) Reviews found online 73 75 AVS dB v550: 60% × 71.9 (est.) + 40% × 72.7 = 72
BluEarth Es ES32: 60% × 72.9 (est.) + 40% × 74.6 = 74
No road tests of wet for AVS dB v550. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.54).
No road tests of wet for BluEarth Es ES32. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.54).
-
72
Comfort
BluEarth Es ES32 +173Why this score
Source AVS dB v550 BluEarth Es ES32 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 70 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 74 75 AVS dB v550: 40% × 70 (est.) + 60% × 74.1 = 72
BluEarth Es ES32: 40% × 70.1 (est.) + 60% × 74.5 = 73
No road tests of comfort for AVS dB v550 or BluEarth Es ES32. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
63
Treadwear
BluEarth Es ES32 +366Why this score
Source AVS dB v550 BluEarth Es ES32 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 65 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 61 65 AVS dB v550: 60% × 64.5 (est.) + 40% × 60.8 = 63
BluEarth Es ES32: 60% × 66 (est.) + 40% × 65 = 66
No road tests of treadwear for AVS dB v550. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
No road tests of treadwear for BluEarth Es ES32. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
-
72
Handling (owners)
BluEarth Es ES32 +375Why this score
Source AVS dB v550 BluEarth Es ES32 Reviews found online 72 75
Scores at a glance
| Category | Yokohama AVS dB v550 | Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 70 | 71 |
| Dry | 71 | 70 |
| Wet | 72 | 74 |
| Comfort | 72 | 73 |
| Treadwear | 63 | 66 |
| Handling (owners) | 72 | 75 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
AVS dB v550
BluEarth Es ES32
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A AVS dB v550
Pros
- Exceptional noise suppression and quiet operation
- Superior ride comfort and softness
- Excellent tread life and durability
Cons
- Susceptibility to tramlining due to directional tread pattern
- Soft sidewalls may struggle with rough or aggressive road surfaces
- Limited availability in certain markets and sizes
Tire B BluEarth Es ES32
Pros
- Exceptional ride comfort and noise reduction
- Strong value proposition compared to premium brands
- Reliable dry-weather traction and handling
Cons
- Wet-weather grip can become unpredictable as tread depth decreases
- Inconsistent tread life, with some users reporting premature wear
- Sidewalls may be susceptible to damage from severe potholes
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Yokohama AVS dB v550 | B · Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | — | 64 |
| Rim diameters | — | 13″ – 18″ |
Which one should you actually buy?
Yokohama AVS dB v550
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32
Too close to call: Yokohama AVS dB v550 and Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 are within 2 points overall. Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 is stronger on treadwear. Yokohama AVS dB v550 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 6 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 scores 66 vs 63 on treadwear.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
AVS dB v550 or BluEarth Es ES32?
Which is better in the wet, AVS dB v550 or BluEarth Es ES32?
Neither, by our numbers: 72 vs 74 on the wet score, within 3 points.
Which grips better on dry roads, AVS dB v550 or BluEarth Es ES32?
Neither, by our numbers: 71 vs 70 on the dry score, within 3 points.
Which is more comfortable, AVS dB v550 or BluEarth Es ES32?
Neither, by our numbers: 72 vs 73 on the comfort score, within 3 points.
Which lasts longer, AVS dB v550 or BluEarth Es ES32?
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32, 66 vs 63 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology