tirewheelguide

Yokohama C Drive looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 vs Yokohama C Drive — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 60 + 45 owner reviews. How we score

Too close to call: BluEarth Es ES32 70, C Drive 71.

Check price on Amazon · BluEarth Es ES32 Check price on Amazon · C Drive
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Yokohama C Drive
Tire BYokohama

C Drive

Summer

Tests – · none yet Owners 72 · 45 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 70

    Dry

    C Drive +1
    71
    Why this score
    SourceBluEarth Es ES32C Drive
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online7173

    BluEarth Es ES32: 60% × 68.9 (est.) + 40% × 70.6 = 70

    C Drive: 60% × 70 (est.) + 40% × 73.3 = 71

    No road tests of dry for BluEarth Es ES32. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

    No road tests of dry for C Drive. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 72

    Wet

    C Drive +2
    74
    Why this score
    SourceBluEarth Es ES32C Drive
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 71 (est.)≈ 73 (est.)
    Reviews found online7375

    BluEarth Es ES32: 60% × 71.3 (est.) + 40% × 72.5 = 72

    C Drive: 60% × 72.8 (est.) + 40% × 75.2 = 74

    No road tests of wet for BluEarth Es ES32. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

    No road tests of wet for C Drive. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 72

    Comfort

    Level
    72
    Why this score
    SourceBluEarth Es ES32C Drive
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 70 (est.)≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online7474

    BluEarth Es ES32: 60% × 70 (est.) + 40% × 74.3 = 72

    C Drive: 60% × 70 (est.) + 40% × 74.3 = 72

    No road tests of comfort for BluEarth Es ES32 or C Drive. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  4. 65

    Treadwear

    C Drive +1
    66
    Why this score
    SourceBluEarth Es ES32C Drive
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 65 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online6567

    BluEarth Es ES32: 60% × 65.3 (est.) + 40% × 64.6 = 65

    C Drive: 60% × 65.9 (est.) + 40% × 66.5 = 66

    No road tests of treadwear for BluEarth Es ES32. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

    No road tests of treadwear for C Drive. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  5. 73

    Handling (owners)

    BluEarth Es ES32 +1
    72
    Why this score
    SourceBluEarth Es ES32C Drive
    Reviews found online7372
Scores at a glance
CategoryYokohama BluEarth Es ES32Yokohama C Drive
Relative Score 70 71
Dry 70 71
Wet 72 74
Comfort 72 72
Treadwear 65 66
Handling (owners) 73 72

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

BluEarth Es ES32

C Drive

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A BluEarth Es ES32

Pros

  • Exceptional ride comfort and noise reduction
  • Strong value proposition compared to premium brands
  • Reliable dry-weather traction and handling

Cons

  • Wet-weather grip can become unpredictable as tread depth decreases
  • Inconsistent tread life, with some users reporting premature wear
  • Sidewalls may be susceptible to damage from severe potholes
All owner themes in the BluEarth Es ES32 review

Tire B C Drive

Pros

  • Excellent wet weather traction and hydroplaning resistance
  • High levels of ride comfort and low road noise
  • Predictable, progressive handling characteristics

Cons

  • Inconsistent tread life reports ranging from premature wear to high mileage
  • Some users report increased noise and stiffness as the tire ages
  • Mixed feedback on dry grip performance under aggressive driving conditions
All owner themes in the C Drive review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 B · Yokohama C Drive
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available64—
Rim diameters13″ – 18″—

Which one should you actually buy?

Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32

Yokohama C Drive

Too close to call: Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 and Yokohama C Drive are within 2 points overall.

Tire A · Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Yokohama C Drive
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

BluEarth Es ES32 or C Drive?

Which is better in the wet, BluEarth Es ES32 or C Drive?

Neither, by our numbers: 72 vs 74 on the wet score, within 3 points.

Which grips better on dry roads, BluEarth Es ES32 or C Drive?

Neither, by our numbers: 70 vs 71 on the dry score, within 3 points.

Which is more comfortable, BluEarth Es ES32 or C Drive?

Neither, by our numbers: 72 vs 72 on the comfort score, within 3 points.

Which lasts longer, BluEarth Es ES32 or C Drive?

Neither, by our numbers: 65 vs 66 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology