Tests 64 · 2 tests Owners 65 · 8 reviews
Yokohama S306 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Yokohama BluEarth RV02 vs Yokohama S306 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 2 + 0 road tests and 8 + 17 owner reviews. How we score
BluEarth RV02 is ahead, 65–58
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
62
Dry
BluEarth RV02 +161Why this score
Source BluEarth RV02 S306 Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests 58 ≈ 63 (est.) Reviews found online 68 57 BluEarth RV02: 60% × 58.5 + 40% × 67.7 = 62
S306: 60% × 63.3 (est.) + 40% × 56.6 = 61
No road tests of dry for S306. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
69
Wet
BluEarth RV02 +1356Why this score
Source BluEarth RV02 S306 Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests 67 ≈ 60 (est.) Reviews found online 72 51 BluEarth RV02: 60% × 67 + 40% × 72.2 = 69
S306: 60% × 60 (est.) + 40% × 50.9 = 56
No road tests of wet for S306. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.54).
-
66
Comfort
BluEarth RV02 +1155Why this score
Source BluEarth RV02 S306 Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests 61 ≈ 65 (est.) Reviews found online 69 48 BluEarth RV02: 40% × 61.3 + 60% × 69.4 = 66
S306: 40% × 65.3 (est.) + 60% × 47.6 = 55
No road tests of comfort for S306. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
65
Noise
No comparison–Why this score
Source BluEarth RV02 S306 Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests 64 – Reviews found online ≈ 67 (est.) – BluEarth RV02: 60% × 64.2 + 40% × 66.5 (est.) = 65
No owner ratings of noise for BluEarth RV02. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
-
61
Treadwear
Level61Why this score
Source BluEarth RV02 S306 Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests 67 ≈ 63 (est.) Reviews found online 52 57 BluEarth RV02: 60% × 66.8 + 40% × 52 = 61
S306: 60% × 63.2 (est.) + 40% × 57 = 61
No road tests of treadwear for S306. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
-
69
Handling (owners)
BluEarth RV02 +2049Why this score
Source BluEarth RV02 S306 Reviews found online 69 49 -
71
Efficiency
No comparison–Why this score
Source BluEarth RV02 S306 Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests 71 –
Scores at a glance
| Category | Yokohama BluEarth RV02 | Yokohama S306 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 65 | 58 |
| Dry | 62 | 61 |
| Wet | 69 | 56 |
| Comfort | 66 | 55 |
| Noise | 65 | – |
| Treadwear | 61 | 61 |
| Handling (owners) | 69 | 49 |
| Efficiency | 71 | – |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
BluEarth RV02
S306
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A BluEarth RV02
Pros
- Exceptional wet and dry surface grip
- High levels of ride comfort and low road noise
- Improved vehicle stability for tall-profile vehicles like MPVs and SUVs
Cons
- Noticeable increase in noise and decrease in comfort as tread wears down
- Reports of premature sidewall or tread cracking
- Inconsistent tread life, with some users noting rapid wear due to softer compounds
Tire B S306
Pros
- Excellent dry weather grip and handling
- High tread longevity and durability
- Stiff sidewall provides good steering feedback
Cons
- Consistently poor wet weather traction
- Harsh ride quality and high road noise
- Tendency to tramline on uneven surfaces
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Yokohama BluEarth RV02 | B · Yokohama S306 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 4 | — |
| Rim diameters | 17″ – 18″ | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
Yokohama BluEarth RV02
Yokohama S306
Winner: Yokohama BluEarth RV02 — better handling, wet and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score. Yokohama S306 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 17 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Yokohama BluEarth RV02 scores 69 vs 49 on handling.
Yokohama BluEarth RV02 scores 69 vs 56 on wet.
Yokohama BluEarth RV02 scores 66 vs 55 on comfort.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
BluEarth RV02 or S306?
Which is better in the wet, BluEarth RV02 or S306?
Yokohama BluEarth RV02, 69 vs 56 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, BluEarth RV02 or S306?
Neither, by our numbers: 62 vs 61 on the dry score, within 3 points.
Which is more comfortable, BluEarth RV02 or S306?
Yokohama BluEarth RV02, 66 vs 55 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, BluEarth RV02 or S306?
Neither, by our numbers: 61 vs 61 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology