Head-to-head Updated

Yokohama Geolandar CV G058 vs Nexen N Fera AU5 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 204 + 6 owner reviews. How we score

Geolandar CV G058 is ahead, 81–55

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Nexen N Fera AU5
Tire BNexen

N Fera AU5

Summer

± 8Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 50 · 6 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 80

    Dry

    Geolandar CV G058 +27
    53
    Why this score
    SourceGeolandar CV G058N Fera AU5
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 76 (est.)≈ 59 (est.)
    Reviews found online8645

    Geolandar CV G058: 60% × 75.5 (est.) + 40% × 86.4 = 80

    N Fera AU5: 60% × 58.7 (est.) + 40% × 45.4 = 53

    No road tests of dry for Geolandar CV G058. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

    No road tests of dry for N Fera AU5. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 85

    Wet

    Geolandar CV G058 +30
    55
    Why this score
    SourceGeolandar CV G058N Fera AU5
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 81 (est.)≈ 59 (est.)
    Reviews found online9049

    Geolandar CV G058: 60% × 81.2 (est.) + 40% × 89.9 = 85

    N Fera AU5: 60% × 59.1 (est.) + 40% × 49.4 = 55

    No road tests of wet for Geolandar CV G058. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for N Fera AU5. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 79

    Snow

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceGeolandar CV G058N Fera AU5
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 75 (est.)–
    Reviews found online85–

    Geolandar CV G058: 60% × 75.1 (est.) + 40% × 85 = 79

    No road tests of snow for Geolandar CV G058. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 79

    Comfort

    Geolandar CV G058 +19
    60
    Why this score
    SourceGeolandar CV G058N Fera AU5
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 72 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online8556

    Geolandar CV G058: 40% × 71.8 (est.) + 60% × 84.6 = 79

    N Fera AU5: 40% × 66.2 (est.) + 60% × 56.3 = 60

    No road tests of comfort for Geolandar CV G058 or N Fera AU5. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 73

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceGeolandar CV G058N Fera AU5
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)–
    Reviews found online83–

    Geolandar CV G058: 60% × 66.5 (est.) + 40% × 82.8 = 73

    No road tests of noise for Geolandar CV G058. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 78

    Treadwear

    Geolandar CV G058 +21
    57
    Why this score
    SourceGeolandar CV G058N Fera AU5
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 73 (est.)≈ 61 (est.)
    Reviews found online8552

    Geolandar CV G058: 60% × 73.2 (est.) + 40% × 85.1 = 78

    N Fera AU5: 60% × 61.2 (est.) + 40% × 51.5 = 57

    No road tests of treadwear for Geolandar CV G058. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

    No road tests of treadwear for N Fera AU5. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 81

    Handling (owners)

    Geolandar CV G058 +27
    54
    Why this score
    SourceGeolandar CV G058N Fera AU5
    Reviews found online8154
Scores at a glance
Yokohama Geolandar CV G058 vs Nexen N Fera AU5: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryYokohama Geolandar CV G058Nexen N Fera AU5
Relative Score 81 55
Dry 80 53
Wet 85 55
Snow 79 –
Comfort 79 60
Noise 73 –
Treadwear 78 57
Handling (owners) 81 54

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

Geolandar CV G058

± 8

N Fera AU5

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Geolandar CV G058

Pros

  • Exceptional grip and handling in both wet and dry conditions
  • Noticeably low road noise and quiet highway driving
  • High ride comfort with supple bump absorption

Cons

  • Slightly less solid handling or stability at very high speeds (above 150 km/h)
  • Some drivers report a slight disconnect in steering precision compared to premium alternatives like Michelin
  • A few users experienced higher-than-desired tread wear on specific fitments
All owner themes in the Geolandar CV G058 review

Tire B N Fera AU5

Pros

  • Exceptional tread life and longevity, lasting multiple years of daily commuting
  • Very quiet and comfortable ride quality with smooth highway manners
  • Soft sidewalls contribute to high comfort levels even at higher tire pressures

Cons

  • Softer sidewalls lead to noticeable flex and reduced responsiveness in hard cornering
  • Lower dry grip levels compared to more aggressive performance tires like the Nexen N Fera SU1
  • Potential for traction loss or wheel spin during wet weather take-offs, particularly on powerful rear-wheel-drive vehicles
All owner themes in the N Fera AU5 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Yokohama Geolandar CV G058 B · Nexen N Fera AU5
CategoryAll-Season tireSummer
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4Passenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available47—
Rim diameters15″ – 20″—
Tread depth11/32″—
UTQG740 A A—
Treadwear warranty65,000 mi—
SidewallBlackwall—
Max pressure50 psi—

Which one should you actually buy?

Yokohama Geolandar CV G058

Nexen N Fera AU5

Winner: Yokohama Geolandar CV G058 — better wet, dry and handling. It leads or ties in every category we score. Nexen N Fera AU5 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 6 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Yokohama Geolandar CV G058 scores 85 vs 55 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Yokohama Geolandar CV G058 scores 80 vs 53 on dry.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Yokohama Geolandar CV G058 scores 81 vs 54 on handling.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Yokohama Geolandar CV G058 scores 78 vs 57 on treadwear.

Tire A · Yokohama Geolandar CV G058
Tire B · Nexen N Fera AU5

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Geolandar CV G058 or N Fera AU5?

Which is better in the wet, Geolandar CV G058 or N Fera AU5?

Yokohama Geolandar CV G058, 85 vs 55 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Geolandar CV G058 or N Fera AU5?

Yokohama Geolandar CV G058, 80 vs 53 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, Geolandar CV G058 or N Fera AU5?

Yokohama Geolandar CV G058, 79 vs 60 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Geolandar CV G058 or N Fera AU5?

Yokohama Geolandar CV G058, 78 vs 57 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology