Tests – · none yet Owners 59 · 12 reviews
Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth vs Yokohama Parada Spec-X — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 12 + 28 owner reviews. How we score
Parada Spec-X is ahead, 69–61
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 68 · 28 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
61
Dry
Parada Spec-X +768Why this score
Source Geolandar G055 Blue Earth Parada Spec-X Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 64 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 58 68 Geolandar G055 Blue Earth: 60% × 63.8 (est.) + 40% × 58 = 61
Parada Spec-X: 60% × 67.8 (est.) + 40% × 68 = 68
No road tests of dry for Geolandar G055 Blue Earth. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
No road tests of dry for Parada Spec-X. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
-
57
Wet
Parada Spec-X +1572Why this score
Source Geolandar G055 Blue Earth Parada Spec-X Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 60 (est.) ≈ 71 (est.) Reviews found online 53 73 Geolandar G055 Blue Earth: 60% × 60.3 (est.) + 40% × 52.9 = 57
Parada Spec-X: 60% × 71.5 (est.) + 40% × 72.8 = 72
No road tests of wet for Geolandar G055 Blue Earth. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
No road tests of wet for Parada Spec-X. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
-
–
Snow
No comparison67Why this score
Source Geolandar G055 Blue Earth Parada Spec-X Professional tests (TWG score) – ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online – 65 Parada Spec-X: 60% × 68.2 (est.) + 40% × 64.8 = 67
No road tests of snow for Parada Spec-X. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
-
65
Comfort
Parada Spec-X +570Why this score
Source Geolandar G055 Blue Earth Parada Spec-X Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 62 70 Geolandar G055 Blue Earth: 60% × 67.9 (est.) + 40% × 61.8 = 65
Parada Spec-X: 60% × 69.3 (est.) + 40% × 70.3 = 70
No road tests of comfort for Geolandar G055 Blue Earth or Parada Spec-X. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
–
Noise
No comparison70Why this score
Source Geolandar G055 Blue Earth Parada Spec-X Professional tests (TWG score) – ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online – 74 Parada Spec-X: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 73.7 = 70
No road tests of noise for Parada Spec-X. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
65
Treadwear
Geolandar G055 Blue Earth +263Why this score
Source Geolandar G055 Blue Earth Parada Spec-X Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 65 (est.) ≈ 64 (est.) Reviews found online 64 61 Geolandar G055 Blue Earth: 60% × 65.1 (est.) + 40% × 64 = 65
Parada Spec-X: 60% × 64 (est.) + 40% × 60.5 = 63
No road tests of treadwear for Geolandar G055 Blue Earth. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
No road tests of treadwear for Parada Spec-X. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
-
58
Handling (owners)
Parada Spec-X +1472Why this score
Source Geolandar G055 Blue Earth Parada Spec-X Reviews found online 58 72
Scores at a glance
| Category | Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth | Yokohama Parada Spec-X |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 61 | 69 |
| Dry | 61 | 68 |
| Wet | 57 | 72 |
| Snow | – | 67 |
| Comfort | 65 | 70 |
| Noise | – | 70 |
| Treadwear | 65 | 63 |
| Handling (owners) | 58 | 72 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Geolandar G055 Blue Earth
Parada Spec-X
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Geolandar G055 Blue Earth
Pros
- Extremely quiet and comfortable ride quality
- Improved fuel economy and low rolling resistance
- Adequate dry road grip and handling
Cons
- Dangerous or unreliable wet weather traction, particularly lateral grip and cornering
- Prone to wheel spin on damp or wet surfaces
- Accelerated or uneven tread wear reported on certain crossover and SUV models
Tire B Parada Spec-X
Pros
- Significantly quieter and more comfortable than competing brands
- Exceptional wet weather performance, handling heavy rain and standing water with confidence
- Strong dry traction and responsive overall handling for aggressive driving
Cons
- Accelerated tread wear observed by some drivers, particularly on heavy SUVs
- Shorter lifespan under harsh winter conditions or aggressive driving styles
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth | B · Yokohama Parada Spec-X |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | High Performance All-Season tire |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | — | 23 |
| Rim diameters | — | 18″ – 24″ |
| Tread depth | — | 11/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 420 A A |
| Sidewall | — | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | — | 51 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth
Yokohama Parada Spec-X
Winner: Yokohama Parada Spec-X — better wet, handling and dry. Where the Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth is ahead, it is by less than 3 points. Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 12 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Yokohama Parada Spec-X scores 72 vs 57 on wet.
Yokohama Parada Spec-X scores 72 vs 58 on handling.
Yokohama Parada Spec-X scores 68 vs 61 on dry.
Yokohama Parada Spec-X scores 70 vs 65 on comfort.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Geolandar G055 Blue Earth or Parada Spec-X?
Which is better in the wet, Geolandar G055 Blue Earth or Parada Spec-X?
Yokohama Parada Spec-X, 72 vs 57 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Geolandar G055 Blue Earth or Parada Spec-X?
Yokohama Parada Spec-X, 68 vs 61 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, Geolandar G055 Blue Earth or Parada Spec-X?
Yokohama Parada Spec-X, 70 vs 65 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Geolandar G055 Blue Earth or Parada Spec-X?
Neither, by our numbers: 65 vs 63 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology