Tests – · none yet Owners – · none yet
Yokohama Geolander A/T G015 vs BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 0 + 1,585 owner reviews. How we score
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 73 · 1,585 reviews
“I like mine so much I'm on my second set. I got 55k out of my first set (could have got another 10k but started to get a little noisy). Exact tire you have (265/70-17 C load) on a 2018 4Runner.”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
–
Dry
No comparison71Why this score
Source Geolander A/T G015 All-Terrain T/A KO2 Professional tests (TWG score) – ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online – 73 All-Terrain T/A KO2: 60% × 70.2 (est.) + 40% × 73.4 = 71
No road tests of dry for All-Terrain T/A KO2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
–
Wet
No comparison70Why this score
Source Geolander A/T G015 All-Terrain T/A KO2 Professional tests (TWG score) – ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online – 70 All-Terrain T/A KO2: 60% × 70.5 (est.) + 40% × 70.3 = 70
No road tests of wet for All-Terrain T/A KO2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
–
Snow
No comparison74Why this score
Source Geolander A/T G015 All-Terrain T/A KO2 Professional tests (TWG score) – ≈ 72 (est.) Reviews found online – 76 All-Terrain T/A KO2: 60% × 72.2 (est.) + 40% × 75.9 = 74
No road tests of snow for All-Terrain T/A KO2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
–
Comfort
No comparison69Why this score
Source Geolander A/T G015 All-Terrain T/A KO2 Professional tests (TWG score) – ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online – 69 All-Terrain T/A KO2: 40% × 68.9 (est.) + 60% × 68.7 = 69
No road tests of comfort for All-Terrain T/A KO2. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
–
Noise
No comparison69Why this score
Source Geolander A/T G015 All-Terrain T/A KO2 Professional tests (TWG score) – ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online – 72 All-Terrain T/A KO2: 60% × 66.5 (est.) + 40% × 71.9 = 69
No road tests of noise for All-Terrain T/A KO2. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
–
Treadwear
No comparison73Why this score
Source Geolander A/T G015 All-Terrain T/A KO2 Professional tests (TWG score) – ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online – 77 All-Terrain T/A KO2: 60% × 70 (est.) + 40% × 76.5 = 73
No road tests of treadwear for All-Terrain T/A KO2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
-
–
Handling (owners)
No comparison66Why this score
Source Geolander A/T G015 All-Terrain T/A KO2 Reviews found online – 66
Scores at a glance
| Category | Yokohama Geolander A/T G015 | BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | – | 71 |
| Dry | – | 71 |
| Wet | – | 70 |
| Snow | – | 74 |
| Comfort | – | 69 |
| Noise | – | 69 |
| Treadwear | – | 73 |
| Handling (owners) | – | 66 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Geolander A/T G015
All-Terrain T/A KO2
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Geolander A/T G015
Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.
Tire B All-Terrain T/A KO2
Pros
- Exceptional off-road traction and puncture resistance on rocks, gravel, and dirt
- Aggressive, rugged aesthetics that enhance the look of trucks and SUVs
- Impressive tread longevity and high mileage capabilities
Cons
- Reduced grip and slippery performance in wet conditions, rain, and standing water
- Rubber tends to harden over time, negatively impacting cold-weather and ice traction
- Higher price point compared to some competitors
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Yokohama Geolander A/T G015
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2
Community sentiment toward the BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2 is largely positive, with drivers frequently praising its aggressive styling, tough sidewalls, off-road durability, and solid general performance. Many owners report capable handling in snow, though several emphasize that it cannot replace a dedicated winter tire and can struggle on ice or packed snow. Criticisms center on high pricing, added weight hurting fuel economy, mud packing, occasional tread chunking, and difficulties with balancing causing highway vibrations.
“I like mine so much I'm on my second set. I got 55k out of my first set (could have got another 10k but started to get a little noisy). Exact tire you have (265/70-17 C load) on a 2018 4Runner.”
“No opinion here between the Yokohamas or Falkens (both of which I would definitely put on my Outback ) but in my experience the BFG KOs are way too much tire for the Outback . I put a set of 4 on my 2013 Outback and quickly discovered that other than looking great, and being virtually bulletproof, everything else about them is a downside. Rough ride, lot of road noise, lost about 2 mpg in fuel cost, and very heavy when I did my tire rotations, which BFG says you should do every 3,000 miles to prevent excess wear. Like they say about many things, the two happiest days in my 2013 Outback ’s life were the day I put the KO2s on, and the day, after about 10,000 miles, I replaced them with “regular” tires . Great tires for a heavier vehicle, but too much for the relatively light Outback . I’ve read many Outback owner’s reviews being very happy with the Wildpeaks AND Geolanders. Sounds like that person has an agenda.”
“I have a set of BFG KO2 as well in the size of 285/75/16 E rated. I agree with Matt (the Krazee) on all assessment except I have never had the tires spin but then again I never really try to (I run a 6.0 PSD with a PowerMax turbo and SRL tunes). What I wanted to add was the experience in snow. These tires are really good in the snow and behave as well as some snow tires I have had on other vehicles. In fact, they are so good I have never needed to activate 4WD. Last March I drove from VA Beach to CT during a storm where I encountered miles of freezing rain, rain snow mix, to full on snow blizzard towing a 24ft enclosed trailer. These tires performed much better than I could ever have imagined both on ice and deep snow. In fact, driving through NYC during the blizzard on unplowed 12+ inches, cars and 18-wheelers stuck everywhere, the Ex with tow in 2wd performed withou hesitation (even climbing uphill from standstill and through snow mounds). The roads were not plowed and at that time I decided these were the best tires I have ever had.”
Based on 395 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Yokohama Geolander A/T G015 | B · BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All-Terrain tire | All-Terrain tire |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | — | 49 |
| Rim diameters | — | 15″ – 20″ |
| Tread depth | — | 13 - 15/32″ |
| Treadwear warranty | — | 50,000 mi |
| Sidewall | — | Black Side Wall - Raised White Lettering |
| Max pressure | — | 35 - 80 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
Yokohama Geolander A/T G015
BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2
Only BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2 has enough test and review data for a Relative Score, so there is no head-to-head winner yet.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology