tirewheelguide

Yokohama iceGUARD iG51v looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Yokohama iceGUARD iG51v vs BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 11 + 1,575 owner reviews. How we score

Too close to call: iceGUARD iG51v and All-Terrain T/A KO2 are level at 72.

Check price on Amazon · iceGUARD iG51v Check price on Amazon · All-Terrain T/A KO2
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Yokohama iceGUARD iG51v
Tire AYokohama

iceGUARD iG51v

Premium Touring Winter tire

Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 72 · 11 reviews

BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2
Tire BBFGoodrich

All-Terrain T/A KO2

All-Terrain tire

Tests – · none yet Owners 73 · 1,575 reviews

“I like mine so much I'm on my second set. I got 55k out of my first set (could have got another 10k but started to get a little noisy). Exact tire you have (265/70-17 C load) on a 2018 4Runner.”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 72

    Dry

    All-Terrain T/A KO2 +1
    73
    Why this score
    SourceiceGUARD iG51vAll-Terrain T/A KO2
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 70 (est.)≈ 71 (est.)
    Reviews found online7476

    iceGUARD iG51v: 60% × 70.3 (est.) + 40% × 74.1 = 72

    All-Terrain T/A KO2: 60% × 70.9 (est.) + 40% × 75.5 = 73

    No road tests of dry for iceGUARD iG51v. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

    No road tests of dry for All-Terrain T/A KO2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 78

    Wet

    iceGUARD iG51v +6
    72
    Why this score
    SourceiceGUARD iG51vAll-Terrain T/A KO2
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 76 (est.)≈ 71 (est.)
    Reviews found online8172

    iceGUARD iG51v: 60% × 75.8 (est.) + 40% × 80.5 = 78

    All-Terrain T/A KO2: 60% × 71.1 (est.) + 40% × 72.2 = 72

    No road tests of wet for iceGUARD iG51v. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

    No road tests of wet for All-Terrain T/A KO2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 75

    Snow

    iceGUARD iG51v +2
    73
    Why this score
    SourceiceGUARD iG51vAll-Terrain T/A KO2
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 73 (est.)≈ 72 (est.)
    Reviews found online7875

    iceGUARD iG51v: 60% × 72.6 (est.) + 40% × 78.1 = 75

    All-Terrain T/A KO2: 60% × 71.7 (est.) + 40% × 75.3 = 73

    No road tests of snow for iceGUARD iG51v. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

    No road tests of snow for All-Terrain T/A KO2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

  4. 71

    Comfort

    iceGUARD iG51v +1
    70
    Why this score
    SourceiceGUARD iG51vAll-Terrain T/A KO2
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 70 (est.)≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online7272

    iceGUARD iG51v: 60% × 69.6 (est.) + 40% × 72 = 71

    All-Terrain T/A KO2: 60% × 69.6 (est.) + 40% × 71.5 = 70

    No road tests of comfort for iceGUARD iG51v or All-Terrain T/A KO2. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 65

    Noise

    All-Terrain T/A KO2 +4
    69
    Why this score
    SourceiceGUARD iG51vAll-Terrain T/A KO2
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online6272

    iceGUARD iG51v: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 62.2 = 65

    All-Terrain T/A KO2: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 72.2 = 69

    No road tests of noise for iceGUARD iG51v or All-Terrain T/A KO2. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 61

    Treadwear

    All-Terrain T/A KO2 +9
    70
    Why this score
    SourceiceGUARD iG51vAll-Terrain T/A KO2
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 63 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online5873

    iceGUARD iG51v: 60% × 63.4 (est.) + 40% × 58.4 = 61

    All-Terrain T/A KO2: 60% × 68 (est.) + 40% × 73.3 = 70

    No road tests of treadwear for iceGUARD iG51v. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

    No road tests of treadwear for All-Terrain T/A KO2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 73

    Handling (owners)

    iceGUARD iG51v +2
    71
    Why this score
    SourceiceGUARD iG51vAll-Terrain T/A KO2
    Reviews found online7371
Scores at a glance
CategoryYokohama iceGUARD iG51vBFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2
Relative Score 72 72
Dry 72 73
Wet 78 72
Snow 75 73
Comfort 71 70
Noise 65 69
Treadwear 61 70
Handling (owners) 73 71

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

iceGUARD iG51v

All-Terrain T/A KO2

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A iceGUARD iG51v

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

Tire B All-Terrain T/A KO2

Pros

  • Exceptional off-road traction and puncture resistance on rocks, gravel, and dirt
  • Aggressive, rugged aesthetics that enhance the look of trucks and SUVs
  • Impressive tread longevity and high mileage capabilities

Cons

  • Reduced grip and slippery performance in wet conditions, rain, and standing water
  • Rubber tends to harden over time, negatively impacting cold-weather and ice traction
  • Higher price point compared to some competitors
All owner themes in the All-Terrain T/A KO2 review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Yokohama iceGUARD iG51v

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Tire B

BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2

Positive

Community sentiment toward the BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2 is largely positive, with drivers frequently praising its aggressive styling, tough sidewalls, off-road durability, and solid general performance. Many owners report capable handling in snow, though several emphasize that it cannot replace a dedicated winter tire and can struggle on ice or packed snow. Criticisms center on high pricing, added weight hurting fuel economy, mud packing, occasional tread chunking, and difficulties with balancing causing highway vibrations.

bobistheoilguy.com ·2021-11-30

“I like mine so much I'm on my second set. I got 55k out of my first set (could have got another 10k but started to get a little noisy). Exact tire you have (265/70-17 C load) on a 2018 4Runner.”
subaruoutback.org ·6 upvotes ·2022-09-17

“No opinion here between the Yokohamas or Falkens (both of which I would definitely put on my Outback ) but in my experience the BFG KOs are way too much tire for the Outback . I put a set of 4 on my 2013 Outback and quickly discovered that other than looking great, and being virtually bulletproof, everything else about them is a downside. Rough ride, lot of road noise, lost about 2 mpg in fuel cost, and very heavy when I did my tire rotations, which BFG says you should do every 3,000 miles to prevent excess wear. Like they say about many things, the two happiest days in my 2013 Outback ’s life were the day I put the KO2s on, and the day, after about 10,000 miles, I replaced them with “regular” tires . Great tires for a heavier vehicle, but too much for the relatively light Outback . I’ve read many Outback owner’s reviews being very happy with the Wildpeaks AND Geolanders. Sounds like that person has an agenda.”
f150forum.com

“I changed my mind on what tire I'm getting. I bought the BFGoodrich All-Terrain KO2 LT in an E1 load rating . Discount tire put my truck specs in and even had new tire placard for the door jam. The new pressure to meet the truck weight and GVWR axle requirements has a recommended tire pressure of 41 psi in the rear and 41 psi in the front. The Goodyear wrangler Adventure with Kevlar C1 load rated LT tires required 45 psi in the rear and 45 psi in the front tires. This due to it's lower rating. Sales manager told me the Goodrich AT KO2 have better on road characteristics, better off road characteristics, and better snow performance. The BFGoodrich AT KO2 were my first choice but didn't think an E1 Load tire would work on my rims. They were the same price as the Goodyear Adventure with Kevlar so I came out good.”
Top themes
#aggressive look#winter and snow traction#sidewall durability#balancing and vibrations#road noise levels#fuel economy impact#tread wear life

Based on 395 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Yokohama iceGUARD iG51v B · BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2
CategoryPremium Touring Winter tireAll-Terrain tire
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4SUV and 4x4
Sizes available249
Rim diameters18″15″ – 20″
Tread depth13/32″13 - 15/32″
Treadwear warranty—50,000 mi
SidewallBlackwallBlack Side Wall - Raised White Lettering
Max pressure51 psi35 - 80 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

Yokohama iceGUARD iG51v

BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2

Too close to call: Yokohama iceGUARD iG51v and BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2 are within 2 points overall. Yokohama iceGUARD iG51v is stronger on wet. BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2 is stronger on treadwear and noise. Yokohama iceGUARD iG51v rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 11 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2 scores 70 vs 61 on treadwear.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Yokohama iceGUARD iG51v scores 78 vs 72 on wet.

Pick tire B You want a quieter cabin

BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2 scores 69 vs 65 on noise.

Tire A · Yokohama iceGUARD iG51v
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

iceGUARD iG51v or All-Terrain T/A KO2?

Which is better in the wet, iceGUARD iG51v or All-Terrain T/A KO2?

Yokohama iceGUARD iG51v, 78 vs 72 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, iceGUARD iG51v or All-Terrain T/A KO2?

Neither, by our numbers: 72 vs 73 on the dry score, within 3 points.

Which is better in snow, iceGUARD iG51v or All-Terrain T/A KO2?

Neither, by our numbers: 75 vs 73 on the snow score, within 3 points.

Which is quieter, iceGUARD iG51v or All-Terrain T/A KO2?

BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2, 69 vs 65 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, iceGUARD iG51v or All-Terrain T/A KO2?

Neither, by our numbers: 71 vs 70 on the comfort score, within 3 points.

Which lasts longer, iceGUARD iG51v or All-Terrain T/A KO2?

BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2, 70 vs 61 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology