Aplus A606 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Aplus A606 vs Nexen N Blue ECO — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 1 + 0 road tests and 0 + 36 owner reviews. How we score

N Blue ECO is ahead, 68–60

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Aplus A606
Tire AAplus

A606

Summer

± 13Provisional

Tests 58 · 1 test Owners – · none yet

Nexen N Blue ECO
Tire BNexen

N Blue ECO

Summer

± 9

Tests – · none yet Owners 62 · 36 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 68

    Dry

    A606 +2
    66
    Why this score
    SourceA606N Blue ECO
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests68≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online≈ 68 (est.)64

    A606: 60% × 67.8 + 40% × 67.9 (est.) = 68

    N Blue ECO: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 64.2 = 66

    No owner ratings of dry for A606. The owner half is estimated from its road-test score, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

    No road tests of dry for N Blue ECO. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 52

    Wet

    N Blue ECO +17
    69
    Why this score
    SourceA606N Blue ECO
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests48≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online≈ 58 (est.)69

    A606: 60% × 48.1 + 40% × 58.3 (est.) = 52

    N Blue ECO: 60% × 69.5 (est.) + 40% × 68.5 = 69

    No owner ratings of wet for A606. The owner half is estimated from its road-test score, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for N Blue ECO. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. –

    Comfort

    No comparison
    63
    Why this score
    SourceA606N Blue ECO
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online–60

    N Blue ECO: 40% × 67 (est.) + 60% × 60.4 = 63

    No road tests of comfort for N Blue ECO. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.21).

  4. –

    Treadwear

    No comparison
    58
    Why this score
    SourceA606N Blue ECO
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 61 (est.)
    Reviews found online–52

    N Blue ECO: 60% × 61.3 (est.) + 40% × 51.9 = 58

    No road tests of treadwear for N Blue ECO. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  5. –

    Handling (owners)

    No comparison
    65
    Why this score
    SourceA606N Blue ECO
    Reviews found online–65
Scores at a glance
Aplus A606 vs Nexen N Blue ECO: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryAplus A606Nexen N Blue ECO
Relative Score 60 68
Dry 68 66
Wet 52 69
Comfort – 63
Treadwear – 58
Handling (owners) – 65

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 13

A606

± 9

N Blue ECO

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

DisciplineCategoryA606N Blue ECOΔHead-to-head
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Overall Ranking Overall #7/7 2021 Za Rulem Summer Tire Test R15 #15/16 2013 ACE Summer Touring Tyre Test – Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A A606

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

Tire B N Blue ECO

Pros

  • Excellent value for money and budget-friendly purchase price
  • Strong grip and handling in both wet and dry conditions
  • Good ride comfort and relatively low road noise

Cons

  • Rapid or uneven tread wear reported by several users
  • Premature rubber cracking and perishing observed over time
  • Polarizing opinions on wet weather traction and braking distance
All owner themes in the N Blue ECO review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Aplus A606 B · Nexen N Blue ECO
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available—24
Rim diameters—13″ – 16″

Which one should you actually buy?

Aplus A606

Nexen N Blue ECO

Winner: Nexen N Blue ECO — better wet. Where the Aplus A606 is ahead, it is by less than 3 points. Aplus A606 rests on little evidence so far (1 test, 0 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Nexen N Blue ECO scores 69 vs 52 on wet.

Tire A · Aplus A606
Tire B · Nexen N Blue ECO

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

A606 or N Blue ECO?

Which is better in the wet, A606 or N Blue ECO?

Nexen N Blue ECO, 69 vs 52 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, A606 or N Blue ECO?

Neither, by our numbers: 68 vs 66 on the dry score, within 3 points.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology