tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Nexen N Blue ECO vs Hankook Ventus Prime 4 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 14 road tests and 36 + 2,532 owner reviews. How we score

Ventus Prime 4 is ahead, 76–65

Check price on Amazon · Ventus Prime 4 or N Blue ECO on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Nexen N Blue ECO
Tire ANexen

N Blue ECO

Summer

± 8

Tests – · none yet Owners 62 · 36 reviews

Hankook Ventus Prime 4
Tire BHankook

Ventus Prime 4

Summer

± 4

Tests 77 · 14 tests Owners 71 · 2,532 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 21 in 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test (dry handling)

“Simbolul cu mașina și fulgerul de pe Hankook Ventus Prime 4 arată că anvelopa e compatibilă și cu mașini electrice (EV), nu că e destinată exclusiv lor. Poate fi folosită fără probleme și pe mașini cu motor termic.”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 66

    Dry

    Ventus Prime 4 +13
    79
    Why this score
    SourceN Blue ECOVentus Prime 4
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 12 tests≈ 66 (est.)83
    Reviews found online6473

    N Blue ECO: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 64.2 = 66

    Ventus Prime 4: 60% × 82.7 + 40% × 73 = 79

    No road tests of dry for N Blue ECO. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 69

    Wet

    Ventus Prime 4 +8
    77
    Why this score
    SourceN Blue ECOVentus Prime 4
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 13 tests≈ 70 (est.)79
    Reviews found online6975

    N Blue ECO: 60% × 69.5 (est.) + 40% × 68.5 = 69

    Ventus Prime 4: 60% × 78.6 + 40% × 74.5 = 77

    No road tests of wet for N Blue ECO. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 63

    Comfort

    Ventus Prime 4 +5
    68
    Why this score
    SourceN Blue ECOVentus Prime 4
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 67 (est.)70
    Reviews found online6067

    N Blue ECO: 40% × 67.1 (est.) + 60% × 60.4 = 63

    Ventus Prime 4: 40% × 70.3 + 60% × 67.3 = 68

    No road tests of comfort for N Blue ECO. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  4. –

    Noise

    No comparison
    61
    Why this score
    SourceN Blue ECOVentus Prime 4
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 8 tests–58
    Reviews found online–≈ 66 (est.)

    Ventus Prime 4: 60% × 57.6 + 40% × 66.3 (est.) = 61

    No owner ratings of noise for Ventus Prime 4. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  5. 58

    Treadwear

    Ventus Prime 4 +16
    74
    Why this score
    SourceN Blue ECOVentus Prime 4
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 6 tests≈ 61 (est.)79
    Reviews found online5267

    N Blue ECO: 60% × 61.3 (est.) + 40% × 52 = 58

    Ventus Prime 4: 60% × 78.5 + 40% × 66.9 = 74

    No road tests of treadwear for N Blue ECO. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  6. 65

    Handling (owners)

    Ventus Prime 4 +7
    72
    Why this score
    SourceN Blue ECOVentus Prime 4
    Reviews found online6572
  7. –

    Efficiency

    No comparison
    84
    Why this score
    SourceN Blue ECOVentus Prime 4
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 9 tests–84
Scores at a glance
CategoryNexen N Blue ECOHankook Ventus Prime 4
Relative Score 65 76
Dry 66 79
Wet 69 77
Comfort 63 68
Noise – 61
Treadwear 58 74
Handling (owners) 65 72
Efficiency – 84

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

N Blue ECO

± 4

Ventus Prime 4

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

DisciplineCategoryN Blue ECOVentus Prime 4ΔHead-to-head
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Overall Ranking Overall #15/16 2013 ACE Summer Touring Tyre Test #11/16 2026 ADAC Summer Tyre Test – Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A N Blue ECO

Pros

  • Excellent value for money and budget-friendly purchase price
  • Strong grip and handling in both wet and dry conditions
  • Good ride comfort and relatively low road noise

Cons

  • Rapid or uneven tread wear reported by several users
  • Premature rubber cracking and perishing observed over time
  • Polarizing opinions on wet weather traction and braking distance
All owner themes in the N Blue ECO review

Tire B Ventus Prime 4

Pros

  • Exceptional wet and dry grip providing high confidence
  • Significantly reduced road noise and smooth, quiet ride quality
  • Competitively priced offering great value compared to top-tier premium brands

Cons

  • Accelerated tread wear reported by some users, leading to shorter overall tire life
  • Noticeable decrease in wet traction and grip as the tread wears down past the halfway mark
  • Stiffer sidewalls can translate to a firmer ride or reduced comfort on rough surfaces
All owner themes in the Ventus Prime 4 review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Nexen N Blue ECO

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Tire B

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

Positive

Community opinion on the Hankook Ventus Prime 4 is largely positive, with drivers viewing it as a comfortable, quiet, and capable touring tire. Users frequently praise its strong dry and wet performance alongside its compelling price-to-performance ratio compared to premium alternatives like Michelin. Some uncertainties exist regarding long-term tread wear and slight fuel economy impacts, but owners generally report satisfactory everyday reliability.

forums.hardwarezone.com.sg ·2024-11-12

“Ya. I read that review too. If I up the psi to 3, or 4 would result in hard and harsh bumps and much less comfy ride which I don't like. Therefore, I settle for 34 front and 32 back and started back to use Eco mode. I don't carry heavy loads and many pax in my car. I restricted it to 4 adult pax including myself as a driver, with or without loads at the boot.”
r/tires ·3 upvotes ·2026-10-09

“Found a cut on one of my tires, is it 100% cooked? Three month old Hankook Ventus Prime 4, covered less than 600miles. Found a small cut on the front right one. It is holding air fine. I will go to a tire shop to get checked asap, but chances that it’s ok? And what could have caused it? Hitting a curb? Thank you in advance!”
r/TyreReviews ·6 upvotes ·2024-03-16

“Hankook Ventus Prime 4 vs Kumho Ecsta HS52? Hey there! Went to this reddit after reading a lot of reviews on the website, a bit of a newbie in general. I have read about many models and settled on 2 possible ones due to pricing and availability in my country (not looking for any other options). In my price range and requirements I've settled on Ventus Prime 4 initially (50% cheaper than Primacy that my car came stock with), but have also seen some good stuff said about HS52. I was quite settled on the first one since it scored very well in 2022 Autobild review, but now that 2024 came out a lot of numbers are completely different (predicted tread life alone took a huge dive) and Hankook is now 4 positions lower than Kumho. To add to this, Hankook was only 10% more expensive thank Kumho in my country, but now there was a price drop and and now there is 20% price difference, so set of Kumhos comes out noticeable cheaper. Spec wise they seems very similar with some trade-offs in different departments. I'm not really looking to save as much money as possible, but with latest reviews I'm not sure if there is any improvement worth paying for. Any thoughts? Thanks. Read more”
Top themes
#value for money#comfort and low noise#wet and dry grip#comparison with premium brands#tread longevity questions#touring versus sports handling

Based on 41 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Nexen N Blue ECO B · Hankook Ventus Prime 4
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / Crossover—
Sizes available2466
Rim diameters13″ – 16″15″ – 20″
UTQG—200 - 420 A A
Sizes in common1111

Which one should you actually buy?

Nexen N Blue ECO

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

Winner: Hankook Ventus Prime 4 — better treadwear, dry and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Hankook Ventus Prime 4 scores 74 vs 58 on treadwear.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Hankook Ventus Prime 4 scores 79 vs 66 on dry.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Hankook Ventus Prime 4 scores 77 vs 69 on wet.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Hankook Ventus Prime 4 scores 72 vs 65 on handling.

Tire A · Nexen N Blue ECO
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Hankook Ventus Prime 4
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

N Blue ECO or Ventus Prime 4?

Which is better in the wet, N Blue ECO or Ventus Prime 4?

Hankook Ventus Prime 4, 77 vs 69 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, N Blue ECO or Ventus Prime 4?

Hankook Ventus Prime 4, 79 vs 66 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, N Blue ECO or Ventus Prime 4?

Hankook Ventus Prime 4, 68 vs 63 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, N Blue ECO or Ventus Prime 4?

Hankook Ventus Prime 4, 74 vs 58 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology