Tests – · none yet Owners 62 · 36 reviews
Nexen N Blue ECO vs Nexen CP672 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 36 + 83 owner reviews. How we score
Too close to call: N Blue ECO and CP672 are level at 65.
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
66
Dry
Level66Why this score
Source N Blue ECO CP672 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 64 65 N Blue ECO: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 64.2 = 66
CP672: 60% × 66.7 (est.) + 40% × 64.9 = 66
No road tests of dry for N Blue ECO. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
No road tests of dry for CP672. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
69
Wet
N Blue ECO +366Why this score
Source N Blue ECO CP672 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 70 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 69 64 N Blue ECO: 60% × 69.5 (est.) + 40% × 68.5 = 69
CP672: 60% × 67.2 (est.) + 40% × 64.2 = 66
No road tests of wet for N Blue ECO. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for CP672. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
–
Snow
No comparison67Why this score
Source N Blue ECO CP672 Professional tests (TWG score) – ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online – 65 CP672: 60% × 68.6 (est.) + 40% × 64.6 = 67
No road tests of snow for CP672. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
63
Comfort
CP672 +164Why this score
Source N Blue ECO CP672 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 60 62 N Blue ECO: 40% × 67.1 (est.) + 60% × 60.4 = 63
CP672: 40% × 67.4 (est.) + 60% × 62 = 64
No road tests of comfort for N Blue ECO. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for CP672. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
–
Noise
No comparison68Why this score
Source N Blue ECO CP672 Professional tests (TWG score) – ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online – 71 CP672: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 70.5 = 68
No road tests of noise for CP672. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
58
Treadwear
CP672 +866Why this score
Source N Blue ECO CP672 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 61 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 52 66 N Blue ECO: 60% × 61.3 (est.) + 40% × 52 = 58
CP672: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 65.8 = 66
No road tests of treadwear for N Blue ECO. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for CP672. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
65
Handling (owners)
N Blue ECO +362Why this score
Source N Blue ECO CP672 Reviews found online 65 62
Scores at a glance
| Category | Nexen N Blue ECO | Nexen CP672 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 65 | 65 |
| Dry | 66 | 66 |
| Wet | 69 | 66 |
| Snow | – | 67 |
| Comfort | 63 | 64 |
| Noise | – | 68 |
| Treadwear | 58 | 66 |
| Handling (owners) | 65 | 62 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
N Blue ECO
CP672
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A N Blue ECO
Pros
- Excellent value for money and budget-friendly purchase price
- Strong grip and handling in both wet and dry conditions
- Good ride comfort and relatively low road noise
Cons
- Rapid or uneven tread wear reported by several users
- Premature rubber cracking and perishing observed over time
- Polarizing opinions on wet weather traction and braking distance
Tire B CP672
Pros
- Exceptional price-to-performance ratio and overall affordability
- Low road noise providing a smooth, quiet, and comfortable ride
- Impressive tread life and long-term durability
Cons
- Subpar wet traction and occasional wheel spin reported by some drivers
- Minor initial squishiness or lack of sharp initial steering bite on tight turns
- Potential for accelerated shoulder wear if wheel alignment is not meticulously maintained
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Nexen N Blue ECO | B · Nexen CP672 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | All Season |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 24 | 41 |
| Rim diameters | 13″ – 16″ | 14″ – 18″ |
| Tread depth | — | 9/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 460 A A |
| Treadwear warranty | — | 70,000 mi |
| Sidewall | — | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | — | 44 psi |
| Sizes in common | 10 | 10 |
Which one should you actually buy?
Nexen N Blue ECO
Nexen CP672
Too close to call: Nexen N Blue ECO and Nexen CP672 are within 2 points overall. Nexen N Blue ECO is stronger on wet. Nexen CP672 is stronger on treadwear.
Nexen CP672 scores 66 vs 58 on treadwear.
Nexen N Blue ECO scores 69 vs 66 on wet.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
N Blue ECO or CP672?
Which is better in the wet, N Blue ECO or CP672?
Nexen N Blue ECO, 69 vs 66 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, N Blue ECO or CP672?
Neither, by our numbers: 66 vs 66 on the dry score, within 3 points.
Which is more comfortable, N Blue ECO or CP672?
Neither, by our numbers: 63 vs 64 on the comfort score, within 3 points.
Which lasts longer, N Blue ECO or CP672?
Nexen CP672, 66 vs 58 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology