Head-to-head Updated

Nexen N Blue ECO vs Nexen CP672 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 36 + 83 owner reviews. How we score

Too close to call: N Blue ECO and CP672 are level at 65.

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Nexen N Blue ECO
Tire ANexen

N Blue ECO

Summer

± 8

Tests – · none yet Owners 62 · 36 reviews

Nexen CP672
Tire BNexen

CP672

All Season

± 7

Tests – · none yet Owners 65 · 83 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 66

    Dry

    Level
    66
    Why this score
    SourceN Blue ECOCP672
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online6465

    N Blue ECO: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 64.2 = 66

    CP672: 60% × 66.7 (est.) + 40% × 64.9 = 66

    No road tests of dry for N Blue ECO. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

    No road tests of dry for CP672. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 69

    Wet

    N Blue ECO +3
    66
    Why this score
    SourceN Blue ECOCP672
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 70 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online6964

    N Blue ECO: 60% × 69.5 (est.) + 40% × 68.5 = 69

    CP672: 60% × 67.2 (est.) + 40% × 64.2 = 66

    No road tests of wet for N Blue ECO. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for CP672. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. –

    Snow

    No comparison
    67
    Why this score
    SourceN Blue ECOCP672
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online–65

    CP672: 60% × 68.6 (est.) + 40% × 64.6 = 67

    No road tests of snow for CP672. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 63

    Comfort

    CP672 +1
    64
    Why this score
    SourceN Blue ECOCP672
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online6062

    N Blue ECO: 40% × 67.1 (est.) + 60% × 60.4 = 63

    CP672: 40% × 67.4 (est.) + 60% × 62 = 64

    No road tests of comfort for N Blue ECO. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

    No road tests of comfort for CP672. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. –

    Noise

    No comparison
    68
    Why this score
    SourceN Blue ECOCP672
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online–71

    CP672: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 70.5 = 68

    No road tests of noise for CP672. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 58

    Treadwear

    CP672 +8
    66
    Why this score
    SourceN Blue ECOCP672
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 61 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online5266

    N Blue ECO: 60% × 61.3 (est.) + 40% × 52 = 58

    CP672: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 65.8 = 66

    No road tests of treadwear for N Blue ECO. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

    No road tests of treadwear for CP672. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 65

    Handling (owners)

    N Blue ECO +3
    62
    Why this score
    SourceN Blue ECOCP672
    Reviews found online6562
Scores at a glance
Nexen N Blue ECO vs Nexen CP672: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryNexen N Blue ECONexen CP672
Relative Score 65 65
Dry 66 66
Wet 69 66
Snow – 67
Comfort 63 64
Noise – 68
Treadwear 58 66
Handling (owners) 65 62

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

N Blue ECO

± 7

CP672

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A N Blue ECO

Pros

  • Excellent value for money and budget-friendly purchase price
  • Strong grip and handling in both wet and dry conditions
  • Good ride comfort and relatively low road noise

Cons

  • Rapid or uneven tread wear reported by several users
  • Premature rubber cracking and perishing observed over time
  • Polarizing opinions on wet weather traction and braking distance
All owner themes in the N Blue ECO review

Tire B CP672

Pros

  • Exceptional price-to-performance ratio and overall affordability
  • Low road noise providing a smooth, quiet, and comfortable ride
  • Impressive tread life and long-term durability

Cons

  • Subpar wet traction and occasional wheel spin reported by some drivers
  • Minor initial squishiness or lack of sharp initial steering bite on tight turns
  • Potential for accelerated shoulder wear if wheel alignment is not meticulously maintained
All owner themes in the CP672 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Nexen N Blue ECO B · Nexen CP672
CategorySummerAll Season
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available2441
Rim diameters13″ – 16″14″ – 18″
Tread depth—9/32″
UTQG—460 A A
Treadwear warranty—70,000 mi
Sidewall—Blackwall
Max pressure—44 psi
Sizes in common1010

Which one should you actually buy?

Nexen N Blue ECO

Nexen CP672

Too close to call: Nexen N Blue ECO and Nexen CP672 are within 2 points overall. Nexen N Blue ECO is stronger on wet. Nexen CP672 is stronger on treadwear.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Nexen CP672 scores 66 vs 58 on treadwear.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Nexen N Blue ECO scores 69 vs 66 on wet.

Tire A · Nexen N Blue ECO
Tire B · Nexen CP672

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

N Blue ECO or CP672?

Which is better in the wet, N Blue ECO or CP672?

Nexen N Blue ECO, 69 vs 66 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, N Blue ECO or CP672?

Neither, by our numbers: 66 vs 66 on the dry score, within 3 points.

Which is more comfortable, N Blue ECO or CP672?

Neither, by our numbers: 63 vs 64 on the comfort score, within 3 points.

Which lasts longer, N Blue ECO or CP672?

Nexen CP672, 66 vs 58 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology