Tests – · none yet Owners 87 · 15 reviews
Continental ContiRoadAttack 3 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Avon Spirit ST vs Continental ContiRoadAttack 3 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 1 road tests and 15 + 1 owner reviews. How we score
Spirit ST is ahead, 82–71
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 73 · 1 test Owners 70 · 1 review
Best test result: #1 of 6 in 2020 Motorcycle Sports Touring Tyre Test (dry braking)
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
82
Dry
Spirit ST +973Why this score
Source Spirit ST ContiRoadAttack 3 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 77 (est.) 73 Reviews found online 89 72 Spirit ST: 60% × 76.7 (est.) + 40% × 89.1 = 82
ContiRoadAttack 3: 60% × 73.2 + 40% × 71.7 = 73
No road tests of dry for Spirit ST. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
87
Wet
Spirit ST +1374Why this score
Source Spirit ST ContiRoadAttack 3 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 83 (est.) ≈ 73 (est.) Reviews found online 93 75 Spirit ST: 60% × 82.9 (est.) + 40% × 93 = 87
ContiRoadAttack 3: 60% × 73.2 (est.) + 40% × 75.2 = 74
No road tests of wet for Spirit ST. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for ContiRoadAttack 3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
78
Comfort
Spirit ST +1167Why this score
Source Spirit ST ContiRoadAttack 3 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 71 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 82 66 Spirit ST: 40% × 71.3 (est.) + 60% × 81.9 = 78
ContiRoadAttack 3: 40% × 68.1 (est.) + 60% × 65.9 = 67
No road tests of comfort for Spirit ST. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for ContiRoadAttack 3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
75
Treadwear
Spirit ST +1065Why this score
Source Spirit ST ContiRoadAttack 3 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 72 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 80 64 Spirit ST: 60% × 71.5 (est.) + 40% × 80.4 = 75
ContiRoadAttack 3: 60% × 65.7 (est.) + 40% × 64.2 = 65
No road tests of treadwear for Spirit ST. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for ContiRoadAttack 3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
87
Handling (owners)
Spirit ST +1671Why this score
Source Spirit ST ContiRoadAttack 3 Reviews found online 87 71
Scores at a glance
| Category | Avon Spirit ST | Continental ContiRoadAttack 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 82 | 71 |
| Dry | 82 | 73 |
| Wet | 87 | 74 |
| Comfort | 78 | 67 |
| Treadwear | 75 | 65 |
| Handling (owners) | 87 | 71 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Spirit ST
ContiRoadAttack 3
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Spirit ST
Pros
- Excellent grip in dry, cold and wet conditions, with confidence-inspiring braking and wet-weather performance, and capability extending to occasional track use
- Stable, predictable handling at high speeds and under heavy loads (pillion and luggage), with a comfortable ride and low noise
- Good tread life reported by several riders, who describe even wear, resistance to squaring off and mileage up to nearly double that of Michelin tyres
Cons
- Wear complaints from a minority, including one rider who got only about 2,000 km
- Reluctance to turn in fast direction changes and a lack of feedback from the tyres, according to one reviewer
- Front tyre vibration and shaking over 60 mph on one BMW K1600GT, which persisted after rebalancing at two garages
Tire B ContiRoadAttack 3
Pros
- Excellent grip and performance on paved surfaces
- High level of rider confidence
- Well-suited for sport-touring applications
Cons
- Not suitable for off-road or gravel terrain
- Susceptible to rapid tread damage when used on unpaved surfaces
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Avon Spirit ST | B · Continental ContiRoadAttack 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Motorcycle | Motorcycle |
Which one should you actually buy?
Avon Spirit ST
Continental ContiRoadAttack 3
Winner: Avon Spirit ST — better handling, wet and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score. Avon Spirit ST rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 15 reviews), so read this result as provisional. Continental ContiRoadAttack 3 rests on little evidence so far (1 test, 1 review), so read this result as provisional.
Avon Spirit ST scores 87 vs 71 on handling.
Avon Spirit ST scores 87 vs 74 on wet.
Avon Spirit ST scores 78 vs 67 on comfort.
Avon Spirit ST scores 75 vs 65 on treadwear.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Spirit ST or ContiRoadAttack 3?
Which is better in the wet, Spirit ST or ContiRoadAttack 3?
Avon Spirit ST, 87 vs 74 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Spirit ST or ContiRoadAttack 3?
Avon Spirit ST, 82 vs 73 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, Spirit ST or ContiRoadAttack 3?
Avon Spirit ST, 78 vs 67 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Spirit ST or ContiRoadAttack 3?
Avon Spirit ST, 75 vs 65 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology