Tests 73 · 1 test Owners 76 · 1 review
Continental ContiRoadAttack 3 vs Michelin Power 5 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.
ContiRoadAttack 3 leads, 74–71 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
76
Dry
ContiRoadAttack 3 +472Why this score
Source ContiRoadAttack 3 Power 5 Professional tests (TWG score) 73 – Reviews found online 80 75 -
78
Wet
ContiRoadAttack 3 +474Why this score
Source ContiRoadAttack 3 Power 5 Reviews found online 81 76 -
70
Comfort
Power 5 +272Why this score
Source ContiRoadAttack 3 Power 5 Reviews found online 71 74 -
65
Treadwear
Power 5 +166Why this score
Source ContiRoadAttack 3 Power 5 Reviews found online 65 66 -
79
Handling
ContiRoadAttack 3 +475Why this score
Source ContiRoadAttack 3 Power 5 Reviews found online 79 75
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental ContiRoadAttack 3 | Michelin Power 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 74 | 71 |
| Dry | 76 | 72 |
| Wet | 78 | 74 |
| Comfort | 70 | 72 |
| Treadwear | 65 | 66 |
| Handling | 79 | 75 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
ContiRoadAttack 3
Power 5
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A ContiRoadAttack 3
Pros
- Excellent grip and performance on paved surfaces
- High level of rider confidence
- Well-suited for sport-touring applications
Cons
- Not suitable for off-road or gravel terrain
- Susceptible to rapid tread damage when used on unpaved surfaces
Tire B Power 5
Pros
- Exceptional wet-weather grip and stability in standing water
- Rapid warm-up times, even in cooler ambient temperatures
- Agile handling and predictable cornering behavior on public roads
Cons
- Tendency for the rear tire to square off prematurely
- Inconsistent performance and grip degradation as the tire reaches the end of its life
- Lack of confidence at maximum lean angles compared to dedicated track tires
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental ContiRoadAttack 3 | B · Michelin Power 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Motorcycle | Motorcycle |
Which one should you actually buy?
Continental ContiRoadAttack 3
Michelin Power 5
Winner: Continental ContiRoadAttack 3 — better dry, wet and handling. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Continental ContiRoadAttack 3 scores 76 vs 72 on dry.
Continental ContiRoadAttack 3 scores 78 vs 74 on wet.
Continental ContiRoadAttack 3 scores 79 vs 75 on handling.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.