Head-to-head Updated

BFGoodrich Advantage All Season vs Michelin CrossClimate 2 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 8 + 33 road tests and 0 + 21,726 owner reviews. How we score

CrossClimate 2 is ahead, 88–75

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

BFGoodrich Advantage All Season

Advantage All Season

All Season

± 7

Tests 77 · 8 tests Owners – · none yet

Best test result: #1 of 15 in 2024 AutoBild All Season Tyre Test (snow traction)

Michelin CrossClimate 2
Tire BMichelin

CrossClimate 2

All Season

± 3

Tests 87 · 33 tests Owners 87 · 21,726 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 35 in 2023 All Season Tyre 35 Set Shootout (dry braking)

“CrossClimate2 in. Alenza Run Flats out. Swapped the Alenza run flats for CrossClimate2 all-weather tires. Sharper handling. Better ride comfort. Very quiet after an initial break-in period. Just make sure the tire pressure is as recommended on the door sill sticker, shop techs don’t always check. I’m an early adopter of CC2 tires, been using them on my old Jeep since 2022, super durable and perfect for inclement weather, still had some tread remaining at the 60k-mile warranty mark.”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

Key facts

  • In 5 tests that measured dry braking for both, Advantage All Season won 0 and CrossClimate 2 won 5 (average 96% vs 98% of the best).
  • In 5 tests that measured wet braking for both, Advantage All Season won 0 and CrossClimate 2 won 5 (average 91% vs 93% of the best).
  • In 3 tests that measured straight aquaplaning for both, Advantage All Season won 3 and CrossClimate 2 won 0 (average 97% vs 96% of the best).
  • In 3 tests that measured snow braking for both, Advantage All Season won 2 and CrossClimate 2 won 1 (average 98% vs 98% of the best).
  • In 3 tests that measured snow traction for both, Advantage All Season won 1 and CrossClimate 2 won 2 (average 98% vs 99% of the best).
  1. 83

    Dry

    CrossClimate 2 +12
    95
    Why this score
    SourceAdvantage All SeasonCrossClimate 2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 8 / 31 tests8799
    Reviews found online≈ 76 (est.)88
    Dry Braking (% of best) · 5 shared tests · wins 0–596%98%
    Dry Handling (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 1–199%99%

    Advantage All Season: 60% × 87.5 + 40% × 76 (est.) = 83

    CrossClimate 2: 60% × 99.2 + 40% × 88.3 = 95

    No owner ratings of dry for Advantage All Season. The owner half is estimated from its road-test score, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 77

    Wet

    CrossClimate 2 +10
    87
    Why this score
    SourceAdvantage All SeasonCrossClimate 2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 8 / 31 tests7883
    Reviews found online≈ 75 (est.)92
    Curved Aquaplaning (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 2–093%91%
    Straight Aquaplaning (% of best) · 3 shared tests · wins 3–097%96%
    Wet Braking (% of best) · 5 shared tests · wins 0–591%93%
    Wet Braking (concrete) (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–191%95%
    Wet Handling (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 0–294%96%

    Advantage All Season: 60% × 78.2 + 40% × 74.8 (est.) = 77

    CrossClimate 2: 60% × 83.1 + 40% × 91.7 = 87

    No owner ratings of wet for Advantage All Season. The owner half is estimated from its road-test score, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 82

    Snow

    CrossClimate 2 +8
    90
    Why this score
    SourceAdvantage All SeasonCrossClimate 2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 4 / 27 tests8699
    Reviews found online≈ 75 (est.)78
    Ice Braking (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–193%96%
    Snow Braking (% of best) · 3 shared tests · wins 2–198%98%
    Snow Handling (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 0–299%100%
    Snow Traction (% of best) · 3 shared tests · wins 1–298%99%

    Advantage All Season: 60% × 85.7 + 40% × 75.3 (est.) = 82

    CrossClimate 2: 60% × 98.6 + 40% × 78.2 = 90

    No owner ratings of snow for Advantage All Season. The owner half is estimated from its road-test score, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. –

    Comfort

    No comparison
    79
    Why this score
    SourceAdvantage All SeasonCrossClimate 2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 4 tests–67
    Reviews found online–86

    CrossClimate 2: 40% × 67.2 + 60% × 86.1 = 79

  5. 70

    Noise

    CrossClimate 2 +9
    79
    Why this score
    SourceAdvantage All SeasonCrossClimate 2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / 20 tests7377
    Reviews found online≈ 66 (est.)83
    Noise (% of best) · 3 shared tests · wins 1–299%99%

    Advantage All Season: 60% × 73 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 70

    CrossClimate 2: 60% × 77.2 + 40% × 82.7 = 79

    No owner ratings of noise for Advantage All Season. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  6. 64

    Treadwear

    CrossClimate 2 +20
    84
    Why this score
    SourceAdvantage All SeasonCrossClimate 2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / 7 tests6381
    Reviews found online≈ 65 (est.)88
    Abrasion (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 0–286%98%
    Wear (% of best) · 3 shared tests · wins 0–363%80%

    Advantage All Season: 60% × 62.9 + 40% × 65.2 (est.) = 64

    CrossClimate 2: 60% × 81.2 + 40% × 88 = 84

    No owner ratings of treadwear for Advantage All Season. The owner half is estimated from its road-test score, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. –

    Handling (owners)

    No comparison
    82
    Why this score
    SourceAdvantage All SeasonCrossClimate 2
    Reviews found online–82
  8. 80

    Efficiency

    CrossClimate 2 +10
    90
    Why this score
    SourceAdvantage All SeasonCrossClimate 2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / 23 tests8090
    Fuel Consumption (% of best) · 3 shared tests · wins 1–197%97%
    Rolling Resistance (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 0–294%96%
Scores at a glance
BFGoodrich Advantage All Season vs Michelin CrossClimate 2: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryBFGoodrich Advantage All SeasonMichelin CrossClimate 2
Relative Score 75 88
Dry 83 95
Wet 77 87
Snow 82 90
Comfort – 79
Noise 70 79
Treadwear 64 84
Handling (owners) – 82
Efficiency 80 90

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 7

Advantage All Season

± 3

CrossClimate 2

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

In the overall rankings of 5 tests that ran both, BFGoodrich Advantage All Season finished ahead 0 times and Michelin CrossClimate 2 5 times.

DisciplineCategoryAdvantage All SeasonCrossClimate 2ΔHead-to-head
Dry Braking Dry 96% 98% −2.5 0–5 in 5 shared tests Newest: 2025 ADAC All Season Tyre Test · 225/45 R17
Dry Handling Dry 99% 99% +0.2 1–1 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2024 AutoBild All Season Tyre Test · 225/50 R17
Curved Aquaplaning Wet 93% 91% +2.1 2–0 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2025 ADAC All Season Tyre Test · 225/45 R17
Straight Aquaplaning Wet 97% 96% +1.3 3–0 in 3 shared tests Newest: 2025 ADAC All Season Tyre Test · 225/45 R17
Wet Braking Wet 91% 93% −2.2 0–5 in 5 shared tests Newest: 2025 ADAC All Season Tyre Test · 225/45 R17
Wet Braking (concrete) Wet 91% 95% −3.6 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2025 ADAC All Season Tyre Test · 225/45 R17
Wet Handling Wet 94% 96% −1.3 0–2 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2024 AutoBild All Season Tyre Test · 225/50 R17
Ice Braking Snow 93% 96% −3.1 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2025 ADAC All Season Tyre Test · 225/45 R17
Snow Braking Snow 98% 98% −0.8 2–1 in 3 shared tests Newest: 2025 ADAC All Season Tyre Test · 225/45 R17
Snow Handling Snow 99% 100% −1.1 0–2 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2024 AutoBild All Season Tyre Test · 225/50 R17
Snow Traction Snow 98% 99% −1.0 1–2 in 3 shared tests Newest: 2025 ADAC All Season Tyre Test · 225/45 R17
Noise Noise 99% 99% −0.1 1–2 in 3 shared tests Newest: 2025 ADAC All Season Tyre Test · 225/45 R17
Abrasion Treadwear 86% 98% −12.3 0–2 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2025 ADAC All Season Tyre Test · 225/45 R17
Wear Treadwear 63% 80% −16.8 0–3 in 3 shared tests Newest: 2025 ADAC All Season Tyre Test · 225/45 R17
Fuel Consumption Efficiency 97% 97% −0.3 1–1 in 3 shared tests Newest: 2025 ADAC All Season Tyre Test · 225/45 R17
Rolling Resistance Efficiency 94% 96% −2.0 0–2 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2024 AutoBild All Season Tyre Test · 225/50 R17
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Total Cost of Ownership Cost #6/15 #3/15 – 0–2 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2024 AutoBild All Season Tyre Test · 225/50 R17
Value Cost 50% 56% −5.9 0–3 in 3 shared tests Newest: 2025 ADAC All Season Tyre Test · 225/45 R17
Overall Ranking Overall #7/16 #5/16 – 0–5 in 5 shared tests Newest: 2025 ADAC All Season Tyre Test · 225/45 R17

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Advantage All Season

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

Tire B CrossClimate 2

Pros

  • Exceptional grip and traction in snow, slush, and winter weather conditions
  • Strong braking and handling performance on dry and wet pavement
  • Long-lasting tread wear and durability

Cons

  • Higher initial purchase price
  • Slight negative impact on fuel economy / EV range for some drivers
  • Potential for increased road noise or harshness as the tires wear down
All owner themes in the CrossClimate 2 review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

BFGoodrich Advantage All Season

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Tire B

Michelin CrossClimate 2

Positive

The community overwhelmingly praises the Michelin CrossClimate 2 for its exceptional snow, ice, and wet-weather traction, often describing it as an ideal all-weather tire. While many drivers report a quiet, comfortable ride and solid durability, some users note potential downsides including reduced fuel or battery efficiency, road noise on certain surfaces, and premium pricing. A few commenters also point out that the tire may be overkill for regions without significant winter weather.

mavericktruckclub.com ·9 upvotes ·2024-08-12

“I replaced the factory Continentals at 9,258 miles at the end of August 2023 with the stock size 225/65R17 Michelin CrossClimate 2's. I waited until the local tire shop had a sale and had these mounted/balanced for under $800. 348 days, 10,004 miles and 4 seasons have passed since then. I spend much of my time around "town" with speed limits under 55 while also having a handful of longer highway drives. These are the closest thing to a "no-compromise" all season tire that I can imagine. They are smooth, quiet and have incredible grip in all weather conditions. Snow, rain, etc. Admittedly, I have not taken my FWD Maverick through any meaningful amount of mud. Maybe there is a tire better suited to this. There are also certainly performance oriented tires that will outperform this tire when it is hot and dry. Last, and certainly not least - there does not seem to be any fuel economy change. I have tracked every tank before and after these tires. Both my best (48.5MPG) and worst (27MPG) full tanks have happened since these were installed. 38.8 overall.”

bobistheoilguy.com ·19 upvotes ·2023-03-10

“I have had the Cross Climate 2 tires on my VW All Track now for about a year and thought I would share some findings about them. 1. They are QUIET on the road. Looking at the tread, you might think they are noisy but they are not! Run as quiet as a normal tire. 2. They give excellent traction and handling on dry, wet and snowy roads. This past winter, I had two occasions to drive on roads covered with 6-10" of snow. Excellent traction. 3. They wear very well! After about 12,000 miles, they hardly show any wear. I expect to get about 50,000-60,000 miles out of these tires. 4. They do exact a mileage penalty. I lost about 2 mpg overall since putting on these tires. However, I do not mind that considering the excellent traction I get from them. 5. They tend to pick up stones in the tread, particularly after the great state of Pennsylvania in its wisdom covers the roads before, during and after a snowstorm with gravel. Overall, this tire is a winner. Handling is excellent as is wear and traction. I would recommend this tire to anyone who wants these features and wants to leave a set of tires on their car year around.”

r/TyreReviews ·35 upvotes ·2026-01-18

“Michelin CrossClimate 2 after 31.000 kilometers I have those Michelin CrossClimate 2 (EU version, made in Spain) for 26 months now and 31.000 kilometers on a heavy Mercedes EQE, the rears are still good but the front tyres are starting to give up on the shoulders. Usual tyre pressure is 2.8 bars, there is still some good tread left on the middle of the tyre. Steering feeling on the snow is also not as good as it used to be. Overall very happy with those tyres, I’ll have to decide between the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 or the CrossClimate 3 Sport (sadly the 3 isn’t available in 255/45 R19) to replace them this year. We have the Pirelli Scorpion SF3 on our second car. Given the car and my usage, I give priority to snow braking, rolling resistance, silence and longevity. I lost a bit of range, comfort and steering engagement when I swapped the factory Bridgestone Turanza T005 for the CrossClimate 2, but in general nothing to call-out.”

Top themes
#Snow and ice traction#Wet handling and hydroplaning#Road noise and comfort#Fuel economy and range#Tread wear and longevity#Premium price point#Directional tread design

Based on 762 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · BFGoodrich Advantage All Season B · Michelin CrossClimate 2
CategoryAll SeasonAll Season
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available7192
Rim diameters14″ – 20″15″ – 21″
Tread depth—9 - 10/32″
UTQG—640 B A
Treadwear warranty—60,000 mi
Sidewall—Black Side Wall
Max pressure—50 - 51 psi
Sizes in common5555

Which one should you actually buy?

BFGoodrich Advantage All Season

Michelin CrossClimate 2

Winner: Michelin CrossClimate 2 — better treadwear, dry and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Michelin CrossClimate 2 scores 84 vs 64 on treadwear.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Michelin CrossClimate 2 scores 95 vs 83 on dry.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Michelin CrossClimate 2 scores 87 vs 77 on wet.

Pick tire B You want lower fuel or energy use

Michelin CrossClimate 2 scores 90 vs 80 on efficiency.

Pick tire A Your priority is straight aquaplaning

BFGoodrich Advantage All Season won 3 of 3 shared straight aquaplaning tests.

Tire A · BFGoodrich Advantage All Season
Tire B · Michelin CrossClimate 2

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Advantage All Season or CrossClimate 2?

Which is better in the wet, Advantage All Season or CrossClimate 2?

Michelin CrossClimate 2, 87 vs 77 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Advantage All Season or CrossClimate 2?

Michelin CrossClimate 2, 95 vs 83 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, Advantage All Season or CrossClimate 2?

Michelin CrossClimate 2, 90 vs 82 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, Advantage All Season or CrossClimate 2?

Michelin CrossClimate 2, 79 vs 70 on our noise score.

Which lasts longer, Advantage All Season or CrossClimate 2?

Michelin CrossClimate 2, 84 vs 64 on our treadwear score.

Which rolls more easily, Advantage All Season or CrossClimate 2?

Michelin CrossClimate 2, 90 vs 80 on our efficiency score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology