Tests – · 1 test Owners 69 · 5 reviews
BFGoodrich Advantage Control vs Michelin Defender2 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 1 + 2 road tests and 5 + 11,304 owner reviews. How we score
Defender2 is ahead, 77–68
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 64 · 2 tests Owners 89 · 11,304 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 10 in 2026 Tire Rack All-Weather vs Winter Tyre Test (noise (tester's mark))
“I just ordered Michelin Defender 2 for our 15 Outback . We've had 2 sets of Yokohama YK-CTX after OEM which only lasted about 20k (first set) and 25k (second set). I've had Michelin Defender (orig) and Michelin Defender2 on our Ford Taurus. Very comfortable and great tread life.”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
67
Dry
Defender2 +1380Why this score
Source Advantage Control Defender2 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 67 (est.) 73 Reviews found online 66 92 Advantage Control: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 66.4 = 67
Defender2: 60% × 72.7 + 40% × 91.6 = 80
No road tests of dry for Advantage Control. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
75
Wet
Level75Why this score
Source Advantage Control Defender2 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 74 (est.) 64 Reviews found online 76 93 Advantage Control: 60% × 73.8 (est.) + 40% × 76.2 = 75
Defender2: 60% × 64 + 40% × 92.5 = 75
No road tests of wet for Advantage Control. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
67
Snow
Advantage Control +760Why this score
Source Advantage Control Defender2 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 69 (est.) 46 Reviews found online 64 79 Advantage Control: 60% × 68.6 (est.) + 40% × 64.4 = 67
Defender2: 60% × 46.4 + 40% × 79.4 = 60
No road tests of snow for Advantage Control. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
68
Comfort
Defender2 +1482Why this score
Source Advantage Control Defender2 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 73 (est.) Reviews found online 68 88 Advantage Control: 40% × 68.5 (est.) + 60% × 67.6 = 68
Defender2: 40% × 72.6 (est.) + 60% × 87.6 = 82
No road tests of comfort for Advantage Control. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for Defender2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
65
Noise
Defender2 +1479Why this score
Source Advantage Control Defender2 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 66 (est.) 73 Reviews found online 63 87 Advantage Control: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 63.2 = 65
Defender2: 60% × 73.2 + 40% × 87 = 79
No road tests of noise for Advantage Control. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
61
Treadwear
Defender2 +1980Why this score
Source Advantage Control Defender2 Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests 56 ≈ 75 (est.) Reviews found online 69 89 Advantage Control: 60% × 56 + 40% × 68.9 = 61
Defender2: 60% × 74.6 (est.) + 40% × 89 = 80
No road tests of treadwear for Defender2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
66
Handling (owners)
Defender2 +2389Why this score
Source Advantage Control Defender2 Reviews found online 66 89
Scores at a glance
| Category | BFGoodrich Advantage Control | Michelin Defender2 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 68 | 77 |
| Dry | 67 | 80 |
| Wet | 75 | 75 |
| Snow | 67 | 60 |
| Comfort | 68 | 82 |
| Noise | 65 | 79 |
| Treadwear | 61 | 80 |
| Handling (owners) | 66 | 89 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Advantage Control
Defender2
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | Advantage Control | Defender2 | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #5/8 2022 Consumer Reports All-Season Tires | #2/10 2026 Tire Rack All-Weather vs Winter Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Advantage Control
Pros
- Noticeably quieter operation compared to previous high-performance tires
- Even and long-lasting tread wear
- Reliable all-weather and daily-driver performance
Cons
- Dry grip is rated as good rather than great for spirited driving
- Average steering feedback and comfort levels
- Limited grip in more severe snow and ice conditions
Tire B Defender2
Pros
- Long-lasting tread life and high mileage capability
- Confident dry and wet traction with stable handling
- Quiet and smooth ride quality on specific vehicles and highway surfaces
Cons
- Stiffer, harder ride compared to original equipment or older models
- Noticeable road noise and lack of noise absorption on certain pavement types
- Reduced fuel economy (MPG) reported by multiple users
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
BFGoodrich Advantage Control
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Michelin Defender2
The community generally views the Michelin Defender2 as a top-tier all-season touring tire, praised mainly for exceptional tread life (reports of 60–80k miles on Teslas), comfort, quiet ride, efficiency, and the 80k warranty. It is frequently recommended, including by Consumer Reports, though it is considered not a performance tire and some say road noise could be better. Minor concerns include speed-rating fitment issues, lack of a snowflake rating, MPG versus competitors, and one report of chemical off-gassing.
“I just ordered Michelin Defender 2 for our 15 Outback . We've had 2 sets of Yokohama YK-CTX after OEM which only lasted about 20k (first set) and 25k (second set). I've had Michelin Defender (orig) and Michelin Defender2 on our Ford Taurus. Very comfortable and great tread life.”
“So here's the latest on Tires recommendations: (still dithering). Looking for smooth, soft ride, good mileage. I do have a mountain home; use ~30ish days during winter ski season, but mostly highway driving in Southern California ( don't disparage me for being a Californian. I cant stand the people or the government too lol. But it's a beautiful state). 2020 300GLC 4MATIC California car, 235/60 18H rating What will it be...?????? MICHELIN DEFENDER LTX M/S - seems like you guys are in favor. But hard to get. And the size is a 235/60 106T designation. Is the T speed max of 116mph not safe enough when OEM was an H rating 130mph? MICHELIN DEFENDER2. $238. Tire rack MICHELIN CrossClimate2 SUV tire rack $248. - hearing both good and bad. I heard they're soft and mileage tanks. Check out reviews on the Michelin USA official site. Pretty interesting. CONTINENTAL CROSSCONTACT LX25 $222. tire rack high rating? Also just got this from TireRack customer service CONTINENTAL EXTREMECONTACT DWS 06 PLUS. $238. Not sure, seems like TR is trying to promote them for Cont.”
“I’m having a set of four 235/65R18 Michelin Defender2’s installed on the Cadillac as I’m typing this post. I’m at America’s Tire. I’m replacing the OEM Michelin Primacy Tour AS tires that only lasted 25,500 miles. I’m hoping that the Defender2’s will last longer, be quieter and smoother riding. We’ll see!”
Based on 26 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · BFGoodrich Advantage Control | B · Michelin Defender2 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All-Season tire | All Season |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 79 | 1 |
| Rim diameters | 14″ – 21″ | 18″ |
| Tread depth | 10 - 12/32″ | 10 - 11/32″ |
| UTQG | 600 - 700 B A | 840 B B |
| Treadwear warranty | — | 80,000 mi |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall | Black Side Wall |
| Max pressure | 44 - 51 psi | 50 - 51 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
BFGoodrich Advantage Control
Michelin Defender2
Winner: Michelin Defender2 — better handling, treadwear and comfort. Pick the BFGoodrich Advantage Control if snow matters most to you. BFGoodrich Advantage Control rests on little evidence so far (1 test, 5 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Michelin Defender2 scores 89 vs 66 on handling.
Michelin Defender2 scores 80 vs 61 on treadwear.
Michelin Defender2 scores 82 vs 68 on comfort.
Michelin Defender2 scores 79 vs 65 on noise.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Advantage Control or Defender2?
Which is better in the wet, Advantage Control or Defender2?
Neither, by our numbers: 75 vs 75 on the wet score, within 3 points.
Which grips better on dry roads, Advantage Control or Defender2?
Michelin Defender2, 80 vs 67 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, Advantage Control or Defender2?
BFGoodrich Advantage Control, 67 vs 60 on our snow score.
Which is quieter, Advantage Control or Defender2?
Michelin Defender2, 79 vs 65 on our noise score.
Which is more comfortable, Advantage Control or Defender2?
Michelin Defender2, 82 vs 68 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Advantage Control or Defender2?
Michelin Defender2, 80 vs 61 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology