tirewheelguide

BFGoodrich Advantage T/A Sport looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

BFGoodrich Advantage T/A Sport vs Continental ContiProContact — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 1 + 79 owner reviews. How we score

Check price on Amazon · Advantage T/A Sport Check price on Amazon · ContiProContact
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. –

    Dry

    No comparison
    67
    Why this score
    SourceAdvantage T/A SportContiProContact
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online–67

    ContiProContact: 60% × 67.4 (est.) + 40% × 66.5 = 67

    No road tests of dry for ContiProContact. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. –

    Wet

    No comparison
    65
    Why this score
    SourceAdvantage T/A SportContiProContact
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online–63

    ContiProContact: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 63.2 = 65

    No road tests of wet for ContiProContact. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. –

    Snow

    No comparison
    62
    Why this score
    SourceAdvantage T/A SportContiProContact
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 65 (est.)
    Reviews found online–56

    ContiProContact: 60% × 65.4 (est.) + 40% × 56.3 = 62

    No road tests of snow for ContiProContact. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

  4. –

    Comfort

    No comparison
    62
    Why this score
    SourceAdvantage T/A SportContiProContact
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online–59

    ContiProContact: 40% × 67.3 (est.) + 60% × 59 = 62

    No road tests of comfort for ContiProContact. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. –

    Noise

    No comparison
    68
    Why this score
    SourceAdvantage T/A SportContiProContact
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online–70

    ContiProContact: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 70.3 = 68

    No road tests of noise for ContiProContact. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. –

    Treadwear

    No comparison
    62
    Why this score
    SourceAdvantage T/A SportContiProContact
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 64 (est.)
    Reviews found online–60

    ContiProContact: 60% × 63.8 (est.) + 40% × 59.5 = 62

    No road tests of treadwear for ContiProContact. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  7. –

    Handling (owners)

    No comparison
    63
    Why this score
    SourceAdvantage T/A SportContiProContact
    Reviews found online–63
Scores at a glance
CategoryBFGoodrich Advantage T/A SportContinental ContiProContact
Relative Score – 65
Dry – 67
Wet – 65
Snow – 62
Comfort – 62
Noise – 68
Treadwear – 62
Handling (owners) – 63

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Advantage T/A Sport

± 7

ContiProContact

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Advantage T/A Sport

Pros

  • Strong cornering grip and stability
  • Responsive steering feedback
  • Comfortable ride quality

Cons

  • Higher than average road noise
  • Vague on-center steering feel
All owner themes in the Advantage T/A Sport review

Tire B ContiProContact

Pros

  • Smooth and comfortable ride quality
  • Low road noise
  • Strong dry and wet grip for most drivers

Cons

  • Soft sidewalls susceptible to impact bubbles and damage from potholes
  • Some complaints about poor wet traction and braking performance
  • Faster-than-expected tread wear or chipping reported by a minority of users
All owner themes in the ContiProContact review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · BFGoodrich Advantage T/A Sport B · Continental ContiProContact
CategoryPremium Touring All Season tireAll-Season tire
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available—56
Rim diameters—15″ – 19″
Tread depth10/32″9 - 12/32″
UTQG600 - 660 A A400 - 540 A - AA A
SidewallBlack Side WallBlack Side Wall
Max pressure44 psi44 - 51 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

BFGoodrich Advantage T/A Sport

Continental ContiProContact

Only Continental ContiProContact has enough test and review data for a Relative Score, so there is no head-to-head winner yet.

Tire A · BFGoodrich Advantage T/A Sport
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Continental ContiProContact
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology