tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

BFGoodrich Advantage T/A vs Hankook Dynapro HP — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 4 + 7 owner reviews. How we score

Too close to call: Advantage T/A 63, Dynapro HP 64.

Check price on Amazon · Advantage T/A Check price on Amazon · Dynapro HP
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

BFGoodrich Advantage T/A
Tire ABFGoodrich

Advantage T/A

High Performance All Season tire

Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 60 · 4 reviews

Hankook Dynapro HP
Tire BHankook

Dynapro HP

Summer

Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 63 · 7 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 63

    Dry

    Advantage T/A +1
    62
    Why this score
    SourceAdvantage T/ADynapro HP
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 65 (est.)≈ 64 (est.)
    Reviews found online6159

    Advantage T/A: 60% × 65.1 (est.) + 40% × 61.1 = 63

    Dynapro HP: 60% × 64.2 (est.) + 40% × 59 = 62

    No road tests of dry for Advantage T/A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

    No road tests of dry for Dynapro HP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 64

    Wet

    Dynapro HP +4
    68
    Why this score
    SourceAdvantage T/ADynapro HP
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online6267

    Advantage T/A: 60% × 65.6 (est.) + 40% × 62.3 = 64

    Dynapro HP: 60% × 68.1 (est.) + 40% × 66.7 = 68

    No road tests of wet for Advantage T/A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

    No road tests of wet for Dynapro HP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 60

    Snow

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceAdvantage T/ADynapro HP
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 64 (est.)–
    Reviews found online53–

    Advantage T/A: 60% × 64.3 (est.) + 40% × 53 = 60

    No road tests of snow for Advantage T/A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

  4. 61

    Comfort

    Dynapro HP +4
    65
    Why this score
    SourceAdvantage T/ADynapro HP
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online5461

    Advantage T/A: 60% × 66.5 (est.) + 40% × 53.7 = 61

    Dynapro HP: 60% × 67.7 (est.) + 40% × 60.7 = 65

    No road tests of comfort for Advantage T/A or Dynapro HP. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 64

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceAdvantage T/ADynapro HP
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)–
    Reviews found online59–

    Advantage T/A: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 59.3 = 64

    No road tests of noise for Advantage T/A. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 64

    Treadwear

    Dynapro HP +1
    65
    Why this score
    SourceAdvantage T/ADynapro HP
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 65 (est.)≈ 65 (est.)
    Reviews found online6265

    Advantage T/A: 60% × 64.6 (est.) + 40% × 62.2 = 64

    Dynapro HP: 60% × 65.3 (est.) + 40% × 64.7 = 65

    No road tests of treadwear for Advantage T/A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

    No road tests of treadwear for Dynapro HP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 56

    Handling (owners)

    Dynapro HP +1
    57
    Why this score
    SourceAdvantage T/ADynapro HP
    Reviews found online5657
Scores at a glance
CategoryBFGoodrich Advantage T/AHankook Dynapro HP
Relative Score 63 64
Dry 63 62
Wet 64 68
Snow 60 –
Comfort 61 65
Noise 64 –
Treadwear 64 65
Handling (owners) 56 57

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Advantage T/A

Dynapro HP

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Advantage T/A

Pros

  • Improved grip levels compared to baseline tires like the XM2
  • Adequate stiffness in cold weather conditions

Cons

  • Highly unpredictable compound performance
  • Poor heat resistance leading to a 'mushy' feel in hot weather
  • Lack of confidence-inspiring grip in cold and wet conditions
All owner themes in the Advantage T/A review

Tire B Dynapro HP

Pros

  • Impressive long-term durability and high mileage potential (up to 68,000 miles reported)
  • Stable performance for motorway travel and holiday towing under normal conditions
  • Consistent and even wear reported over extended periods (e.g., 40,000 km)

Cons

  • Extreme and premature front tire degradation, including uneven wear and a melted appearance at very low mileage
  • Lack of traction on soft or slippery surfaces like wet grass
  • Reduced performance and confidence when towing heavier loads such as a caravan
All owner themes in the Dynapro HP review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · BFGoodrich Advantage T/A B · Hankook Dynapro HP
CategoryHigh Performance All Season tireSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverSUV and 4x4
Sizes available—14
Rim diameters—16″ – 18″
Tread depth10 - 12/32″—
UTQG560 - 680 A A - B—
SidewallBlack Side Wall—
Max pressure44 psi—

Which one should you actually buy?

BFGoodrich Advantage T/A

Hankook Dynapro HP

Too close to call: BFGoodrich Advantage T/A and Hankook Dynapro HP are within 2 points overall. Hankook Dynapro HP is stronger on wet and comfort. BFGoodrich Advantage T/A rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 4 reviews), so read this result as provisional. Hankook Dynapro HP rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 7 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Hankook Dynapro HP scores 68 vs 64 on wet.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Hankook Dynapro HP scores 65 vs 61 on comfort.

Tire A · BFGoodrich Advantage T/A
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Hankook Dynapro HP
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Advantage T/A or Dynapro HP?

Which is better in the wet, Advantage T/A or Dynapro HP?

Hankook Dynapro HP, 68 vs 64 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Advantage T/A or Dynapro HP?

Neither, by our numbers: 63 vs 62 on the dry score, within 3 points.

Which is more comfortable, Advantage T/A or Dynapro HP?

Hankook Dynapro HP, 65 vs 61 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Advantage T/A or Dynapro HP?

Neither, by our numbers: 64 vs 65 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology