tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Kumho Crugen HT51 vs Hankook Dynapro HP — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 1 + 0 road tests and 164 + 7 owner reviews. How we score

Crugen HT51 is ahead, 72–64

Check price on Amazon · Crugen HT51 or Dynapro HP on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Kumho Crugen HT51
Tire AKumho

Crugen HT51

All Season

Tests – · 1 test Owners 75 · 164 reviews

Hankook Dynapro HP
Tire BHankook

Dynapro HP

Summer

Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 63 · 7 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 73

    Dry

    Crugen HT51 +11
    62
    Why this score
    SourceCrugen HT51Dynapro HP
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 71 (est.)≈ 64 (est.)
    Reviews found online7759

    Crugen HT51: 60% × 71.3 (est.) + 40% × 76.5 = 73

    Dynapro HP: 60% × 64.2 (est.) + 40% × 59 = 62

    No road tests of dry for Crugen HT51. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

    No road tests of dry for Dynapro HP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 75

    Wet

    Crugen HT51 +7
    68
    Why this score
    SourceCrugen HT51Dynapro HP
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 74 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online7767

    Crugen HT51: 60% × 73.8 (est.) + 40% × 76.9 = 75

    Dynapro HP: 60% × 68.1 (est.) + 40% × 66.7 = 68

    No road tests of wet for Crugen HT51. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

    No road tests of wet for Dynapro HP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 70

    Snow

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceCrugen HT51Dynapro HP
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 70 (est.)–
    Reviews found online70–

    Crugen HT51: 60% × 69.8 (est.) + 40% × 69.6 = 70

    No road tests of snow for Crugen HT51. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

  4. 71

    Comfort

    Crugen HT51 +6
    65
    Why this score
    SourceCrugen HT51Dynapro HP
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 70 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online7261

    Crugen HT51: 60% × 69.7 (est.) + 40% × 72.2 = 71

    Dynapro HP: 60% × 67.7 (est.) + 40% × 60.7 = 65

    No road tests of comfort for Crugen HT51 or Dynapro HP. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 72

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceCrugen HT51Dynapro HP
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)–
    Reviews found online78–

    Crugen HT51: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 78.3 = 72

    No road tests of noise for Crugen HT51. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 64

    Treadwear

    Dynapro HP +1
    65
    Why this score
    SourceCrugen HT51Dynapro HP
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests58≈ 65 (est.)
    Reviews found online7465

    Crugen HT51: 60% × 57.7 + 40% × 74.1 = 64

    Dynapro HP: 60% × 65.3 (est.) + 40% × 64.7 = 65

    No road tests of treadwear for Dynapro HP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 75

    Handling (owners)

    Crugen HT51 +18
    57
    Why this score
    SourceCrugen HT51Dynapro HP
    Reviews found online7557
Scores at a glance
CategoryKumho Crugen HT51Hankook Dynapro HP
Relative Score 72 64
Dry 73 62
Wet 75 68
Snow 70 –
Comfort 71 65
Noise 72 –
Treadwear 64 65
Handling (owners) 75 57

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Crugen HT51

Dynapro HP

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Crugen HT51

Pros

  • Exceptional value and lower price point compared to premium competitors
  • Smooth, quiet, and comfortable highway ride
  • Strong dry, wet, and winter/snow traction

Cons

  • Slightly vague or 'squishy' steering feel/sidewall stiffness compared to some OEM tires
  • Potential negative impact on fuel economy (decreased MPG for some truck owners)
  • Occasional reports of accelerated shoulder wear or balancing issues
All owner themes in the Crugen HT51 review

Tire B Dynapro HP

Pros

  • Impressive long-term durability and high mileage potential (up to 68,000 miles reported)
  • Stable performance for motorway travel and holiday towing under normal conditions
  • Consistent and even wear reported over extended periods (e.g., 40,000 km)

Cons

  • Extreme and premature front tire degradation, including uneven wear and a melted appearance at very low mileage
  • Lack of traction on soft or slippery surfaces like wet grass
  • Reduced performance and confidence when towing heavier loads such as a caravan
All owner themes in the Dynapro HP review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Kumho Crugen HT51 B · Hankook Dynapro HP
CategoryAll SeasonSummer
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4SUV and 4x4
Sizes available4414
Rim diameters15″ – 22″16″ – 18″
Tread depth12.5/32″—
UTQG720 A A—
Treadwear warranty70,000 mi—
SidewallBlackwall—
Max pressure50 psi—
Sizes in common1010

Which one should you actually buy?

Kumho Crugen HT51

Hankook Dynapro HP

Winner: Kumho Crugen HT51 — better handling, dry and wet. Where the Hankook Dynapro HP is ahead, it is by less than 3 points. Hankook Dynapro HP rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 7 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Kumho Crugen HT51 scores 75 vs 57 on handling.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Kumho Crugen HT51 scores 73 vs 62 on dry.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Kumho Crugen HT51 scores 75 vs 68 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Kumho Crugen HT51 scores 71 vs 65 on comfort.

Tire A · Kumho Crugen HT51
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Hankook Dynapro HP
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Crugen HT51 or Dynapro HP?

Which is better in the wet, Crugen HT51 or Dynapro HP?

Kumho Crugen HT51, 75 vs 68 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Crugen HT51 or Dynapro HP?

Kumho Crugen HT51, 73 vs 62 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, Crugen HT51 or Dynapro HP?

Kumho Crugen HT51, 71 vs 65 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Crugen HT51 or Dynapro HP?

Neither, by our numbers: 64 vs 65 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology