tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

BFGoodrich Advantage T/A vs Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 4 + 67 owner reviews. How we score

Check price on Amazon · Advantage T/A Check price on Amazon · Dynapro HP2 RA33
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

BFGoodrich Advantage T/A
Tire ABFGoodrich

Advantage T/A

High Performance All Season tire

Tests – · none yet Owners – · 4 reviews (needs 5)

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. –

    Dry

    No comparison
    74
    Why this score
    SourceAdvantage T/ADynapro HP2 RA33
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 72 (est.)
    Reviews found online–77

    Dynapro HP2 RA33: 60% × 72 (est.) + 40% × 77.4 = 74

    No road tests of dry for Dynapro HP2 RA33. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. –

    Wet

    No comparison
    78
    Why this score
    SourceAdvantage T/ADynapro HP2 RA33
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 76 (est.)
    Reviews found online–80

    Dynapro HP2 RA33: 60% × 75.9 (est.) + 40% × 80.1 = 78

    No road tests of wet for Dynapro HP2 RA33. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. –

    Snow

    No comparison
    69
    Why this score
    SourceAdvantage T/ADynapro HP2 RA33
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online–67

    Dynapro HP2 RA33: 60% × 69.5 (est.) + 40% × 67.3 = 69

    No road tests of snow for Dynapro HP2 RA33. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

  4. –

    Comfort

    No comparison
    75
    Why this score
    SourceAdvantage T/ADynapro HP2 RA33
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 71 (est.)
    Reviews found online–78

    Dynapro HP2 RA33: 40% × 70.7 (est.) + 60% × 77.9 = 75

    No road tests of comfort for Dynapro HP2 RA33. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. –

    Noise

    No comparison
    70
    Why this score
    SourceAdvantage T/ADynapro HP2 RA33
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online–75

    Dynapro HP2 RA33: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 74.7 = 70

    No road tests of noise for Dynapro HP2 RA33. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. –

    Treadwear

    No comparison
    72
    Why this score
    SourceAdvantage T/ADynapro HP2 RA33
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online–77

    Dynapro HP2 RA33: 60% × 69.7 (est.) + 40% × 76.5 = 72

    No road tests of treadwear for Dynapro HP2 RA33. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  7. –

    Handling (owners)

    No comparison
    74
    Why this score
    SourceAdvantage T/ADynapro HP2 RA33
    Reviews found online–74
Scores at a glance
CategoryBFGoodrich Advantage T/AHankook Dynapro HP2 RA33
Relative Score – 74
Dry – 74
Wet – 78
Snow – 69
Comfort – 75
Noise – 70
Treadwear – 72
Handling (owners) – 74

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Advantage T/A

± 7

Dynapro HP2 RA33

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Advantage T/A

Pros

  • Improved grip levels compared to baseline tires like the XM2
  • Adequate stiffness in cold weather conditions

Cons

  • Highly unpredictable compound performance
  • Poor heat resistance leading to a 'mushy' feel in hot weather
  • Lack of confidence-inspiring grip in cold and wet conditions
All owner themes in the Advantage T/A review

Tire B Dynapro HP2 RA33

Pros

  • Exceptional value and cost-effectiveness compared to premium brands like Michelin
  • Quiet, smooth, and comfortable ride quality
  • Strong dry and wet traction under normal driving conditions

Cons

  • Occasional road noise or humming sound at higher speeds or on concrete surfaces
  • Potential for faster or average tread wear depending on driving habits and vehicle type
  • Some users reported sketchy wet cornering grip or sliding on roundabouts
All owner themes in the Dynapro HP2 RA33 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · BFGoodrich Advantage T/A B · Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33
CategoryHigh Performance All Season tireSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverSUV and 4x4
Sizes available—49
Rim diameters—15″ – 22″
Tread depth10 - 12/32″—
UTQG560 - 680 A A - B—
Treadwear warranty—65,000 mi
SidewallBlack Side Wall—
Max pressure44 psi—

Which one should you actually buy?

BFGoodrich Advantage T/A

Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33

Only Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33 has enough test and review data for a Relative Score, so there is no head-to-head winner yet.

Tire A · BFGoodrich Advantage T/A
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology