Tests – · none yet Owners 56 · 7 reviews
BFGoodrich A/T KO2 vs Continental Cross Contact A/T — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 7 + 14 owner reviews. How we score
Cross Contact A/T is ahead, 64–59
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 60 · 14 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
60
Dry
Cross Contact A/T +464Why this score
Source A/T KO2 Cross Contact A/T Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 63 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 55 62 A/T KO2: 60% × 62.7 (est.) + 40% × 55.2 = 60
Cross Contact A/T: 60% × 65.5 (est.) + 40% × 62.2 = 64
No road tests of dry for A/T KO2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
No road tests of dry for Cross Contact A/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
-
59
Wet
Cross Contact A/T +564Why this score
Source A/T KO2 Cross Contact A/T Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 62 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 55 63 A/T KO2: 60% × 61.6 (est.) + 40% × 55.2 = 59
Cross Contact A/T: 60% × 65.7 (est.) + 40% × 62.5 = 64
No road tests of wet for A/T KO2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
No road tests of wet for Cross Contact A/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
-
–
Snow
No comparison53Why this score
Source A/T KO2 Cross Contact A/T Professional tests (TWG score) – ≈ 60 (est.) Reviews found online – 41 Cross Contact A/T: 60% × 60.4 (est.) + 40% × 41.3 = 53
No road tests of snow for Cross Contact A/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
-
60
Comfort
Cross Contact A/T +565Why this score
Source A/T KO2 Cross Contact A/T Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 51 60 A/T KO2: 60% × 65.9 (est.) + 40% × 50.7 = 60
Cross Contact A/T: 60% × 67.6 (est.) + 40% × 60.4 = 65
No road tests of comfort for A/T KO2 or Cross Contact A/T. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
63
Treadwear
Cross Contact A/T +265Why this score
Source A/T KO2 Cross Contact A/T Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 64 (est.) ≈ 65 (est.) Reviews found online 61 64 A/T KO2: 60% × 64.3 (est.) + 40% × 61.2 = 63
Cross Contact A/T: 60% × 65.2 (est.) + 40% × 64.4 = 65
No road tests of treadwear for A/T KO2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
No road tests of treadwear for Cross Contact A/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
-
47
Handling (owners)
Cross Contact A/T +1562Why this score
Source A/T KO2 Cross Contact A/T Reviews found online 47 62
Scores at a glance
| Category | BFGoodrich A/T KO2 | Continental Cross Contact A/T |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 59 | 64 |
| Dry | 60 | 64 |
| Wet | 59 | 64 |
| Snow | – | 53 |
| Comfort | 60 | 65 |
| Treadwear | 63 | 65 |
| Handling (owners) | 47 | 62 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
A/T KO2
Cross Contact A/T
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A A/T KO2
Pros
- Exceptional durability and long tread life, holding up well over years and extreme temperatures
- Strong off-road performance in mud, rocks, and sand with reliable sidewall strength when aired down
- Aggressive, appealing visual styling ('badass' look)
Cons
- Increased road noise during daily city driving
- Less than optimal comfort on-road
- Compromised performance and grip in wet on-road conditions
Tire B Cross Contact A/T
Pros
- Excellent on-road comfort and handling with acceptable noise levels
- High potential longevity and mileage for many users, with sets lasting upwards of 50,000 to 80,000 km/miles
- Competent dry and wet performance on paved surfaces
Cons
- Susceptibility to punctures and fragile sidewalls reported by some drivers
- Rapid, premature tread wear experienced by certain users
- Poor traction and spinning issues in winter conditions such as snow and ice
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · BFGoodrich A/T KO2 | B · Continental Cross Contact A/T |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All-Terrain tire | All-Terrain tire |
| Vehicle type | — | SUV and 4x4 |
Which one should you actually buy?
BFGoodrich A/T KO2
Continental Cross Contact A/T
Winner: Continental Cross Contact A/T — better handling, wet and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score. BFGoodrich A/T KO2 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 7 reviews), so read this result as provisional. Continental Cross Contact A/T rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 14 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Continental Cross Contact A/T scores 62 vs 47 on handling.
Continental Cross Contact A/T scores 64 vs 59 on wet.
Continental Cross Contact A/T scores 65 vs 60 on comfort.
Continental Cross Contact A/T scores 64 vs 60 on dry.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
A/T KO2 or Cross Contact A/T?
Which is better in the wet, A/T KO2 or Cross Contact A/T?
Continental Cross Contact A/T, 64 vs 59 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, A/T KO2 or Cross Contact A/T?
Continental Cross Contact A/T, 64 vs 60 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, A/T KO2 or Cross Contact A/T?
Continental Cross Contact A/T, 65 vs 60 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, A/T KO2 or Cross Contact A/T?
Neither, by our numbers: 63 vs 65 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology