Head-to-head Updated

BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S vs Bridgestone Potenza RE070r — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 1 + 0 road tests and 1 + 4 owner reviews. How we score

g-Force COMP-2 A/S leads, 71–67 Narrow edge

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S

g-Force COMP-2 A/S

Ultra High Performance All Season tire

Provisional

Tests – · 1 test Owners 68 · 1 review

Best test result: #2 of 19 in 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance All-Season Tires (tested tread life (miles))

Bridgestone Potenza RE070r

Potenza RE070r

Summer Extreme Performance tires

Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 65 · 4 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 72

    Dry

    Level
    72
    Why this score
    Sourceg-Force COMP-2 A/SPotenza RE070r
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 70 (est.)≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online7474

    g-Force COMP-2 A/S: 60% × 70.1 (est.) + 40% × 73.7 = 72

    Potenza RE070r: 60% × 70.3 (est.) + 40% × 74 = 72

    No road tests of dry for g-Force COMP-2 A/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

    No road tests of dry for Potenza RE070r. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 72

    Wet

    g-Force COMP-2 A/S +6
    66
    Why this score
    Sourceg-Force COMP-2 A/SPotenza RE070r
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 72 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online7365

    g-Force COMP-2 A/S: 60% × 71.5 (est.) + 40% × 72.9 = 72

    Potenza RE070r: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 65.3 = 66

    No road tests of wet for g-Force COMP-2 A/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

    No road tests of wet for Potenza RE070r. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 65

    Snow

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    Sourceg-Force COMP-2 A/SPotenza RE070r
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)–
    Reviews found online61–

    g-Force COMP-2 A/S: 60% × 67 (est.) + 40% × 61.1 = 65

    No road tests of snow for g-Force COMP-2 A/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

  4. 69

    Comfort

    g-Force COMP-2 A/S +9
    60
    Why this score
    Sourceg-Force COMP-2 A/SPotenza RE070r
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online6852

    g-Force COMP-2 A/S: 60% × 68.9 (est.) + 40% × 68 = 69

    Potenza RE070r: 60% × 66.1 (est.) + 40% × 51.7 = 60

    No road tests of comfort for g-Force COMP-2 A/S or Potenza RE070r. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 67

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    Sourceg-Force COMP-2 A/SPotenza RE070r
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)–
    Reviews found online67–

    g-Force COMP-2 A/S: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 67.1 = 67

    No road tests of noise for g-Force COMP-2 A/S. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 70

    Treadwear

    g-Force COMP-2 A/S +9
    61
    Why this score
    Sourceg-Force COMP-2 A/SPotenza RE070r
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests76≈ 63 (est.)
    Reviews found online6258

    g-Force COMP-2 A/S: 60% × 75.5 + 40% × 61.6 = 70

    Potenza RE070r: 60% × 63.2 (est.) + 40% × 57.7 = 61

    No road tests of treadwear for Potenza RE070r. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 72

    Handling (owners)

    Level
    72
    Why this score
    Sourceg-Force COMP-2 A/SPotenza RE070r
    Reviews found online7272
Scores at a glance
BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S vs Bridgestone Potenza RE070r: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryBFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/SBridgestone Potenza RE070r
Relative Score 71 67
Dry 72 72
Wet 72 66
Snow 65 –
Comfort 69 60
Noise 67 –
Treadwear 70 61
Handling (owners) 72 72

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

g-Force COMP-2 A/S

Potenza RE070r

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A g-Force COMP-2 A/S

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

Tire B Potenza RE070r

Pros

  • Exceptional dry grip and cornering stability
  • Excellent steering feedback and communication
  • Strong performance consistency under high-heat track conditions

Cons

  • Very stiff sidewalls leading to a harsh ride
  • Rapid tread wear
  • Increased road noise
All owner themes in the Potenza RE070r review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S B · Bridgestone Potenza RE070r
CategoryUltra High Performance All Season tireSummer Extreme Performance tires
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Tread depth9 - 10/32″—
UTQG400 AA A—
Treadwear warranty45,000 mi—
SidewallBlack Side Wall—
Max pressure50 - 51 psi—

Which one should you actually buy?

BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S

Bridgestone Potenza RE070r

Narrow edge: BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S — better comfort, treadwear and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score. BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S rests on little evidence so far (1 test, 1 review), so read this result as provisional. Bridgestone Potenza RE070r rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 4 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S scores 69 vs 60 on comfort.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S scores 70 vs 61 on treadwear.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S scores 72 vs 66 on wet.

Tire A · BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S
Tire B · Bridgestone Potenza RE070r

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

g-Force COMP-2 A/S or Potenza RE070r?

Which is better in the wet, g-Force COMP-2 A/S or Potenza RE070r?

BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S, 72 vs 66 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, g-Force COMP-2 A/S or Potenza RE070r?

Neither, by our numbers: 72 vs 72 on the dry score, within 3 points.

Which is more comfortable, g-Force COMP-2 A/S or Potenza RE070r?

BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S, 69 vs 60 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, g-Force COMP-2 A/S or Potenza RE070r?

BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S, 70 vs 61 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology