Tests – · 1 test Owners 68 · 1 review
Best test result: #2 of 19 in 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance All-Season Tires (tested tread life (miles))
Head-to-head
Updated
BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S vs Falken ZIEX CT50 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 1 + 0 road tests and 1 + 3 owner reviews. How we score
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
70
Dry
No comparison–Why this score
Source g-Force COMP-2 A/S ZIEX CT50 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) – Reviews found online 71 – g-Force COMP-2 A/S: 60% × 69.4 (est.) + 40% × 71.3 = 70
No road tests of dry for g-Force COMP-2 A/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
71
Wet
No comparison–Why this score
Source g-Force COMP-2 A/S ZIEX CT50 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 71 (est.) – Reviews found online 71 – g-Force COMP-2 A/S: 60% × 71.1 (est.) + 40% × 71.4 = 71
No road tests of wet for g-Force COMP-2 A/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
68
Comfort
No comparison–Why this score
Source g-Force COMP-2 A/S ZIEX CT50 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) – Reviews found online 67 – g-Force COMP-2 A/S: 40% × 68.8 (est.) + 60% × 67.2 = 68
No road tests of comfort for g-Force COMP-2 A/S. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
70
Treadwear
No comparison–Why this score
Source g-Force COMP-2 A/S ZIEX CT50 Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests 77 – Reviews found online 59 – g-Force COMP-2 A/S: 60% × 77.1 + 40% × 59.4 = 70
-
69
Handling (owners)
No comparison–Why this score
Source g-Force COMP-2 A/S ZIEX CT50 Reviews found online 69 –
Scores at a glance
| Category | BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S | Falken ZIEX CT50 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 70 | – |
| Dry | 70 | – |
| Wet | 71 | – |
| Comfort | 68 | – |
| Treadwear | 70 | – |
| Handling (owners) | 69 | – |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
70
/ 100
g-Force COMP-2 A/S
–
/ 100
ZIEX CT50
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S | B · Falken ZIEX CT50 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Ultra High Performance All Season tire | Summer Premium Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Tread depth | 9 - 10/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 400 AA A | — |
| Treadwear warranty | 45,000 mi | — |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall | — |
| Max pressure | 50 - 51 psi | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
70
/ 100
BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S
–
/ 100
Falken ZIEX CT50
Only BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S has enough test and review data for a Relative Score, so there is no head-to-head winner yet.
Tire A · BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S
Tire B · Falken ZIEX CT50
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology