tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S vs Michelin Pilot Sport PS2 ZP — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 1 + 0 road tests and 1 + 12 owner reviews. How we score

Pilot Sport PS2 ZP leads, 73–71 Narrow edge

Check price on Amazon · Pilot Sport PS2 ZP or g-Force COMP-2 A/S on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S
Tire ABFGoodrich

g-Force COMP-2 A/S

Ultra High Performance All Season tire

Provisional

Tests – · 1 test Owners 68 · 1 review

Best test result: #2 of 19 in 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance All-Season Tires (tested tread life (miles))

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 72

    Dry

    Pilot Sport PS2 ZP +3
    75
    Why this score
    Sourceg-Force COMP-2 A/SPilot Sport PS2 ZP
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 70 (est.)≈ 72 (est.)
    Reviews found online7479

    g-Force COMP-2 A/S: 60% × 70.1 (est.) + 40% × 73.7 = 72

    Pilot Sport PS2 ZP: 60% × 72.2 (est.) + 40% × 78.9 = 75

    No road tests of dry for g-Force COMP-2 A/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

    No road tests of dry for Pilot Sport PS2 ZP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 72

    Wet

    Pilot Sport PS2 ZP +4
    76
    Why this score
    Sourceg-Force COMP-2 A/SPilot Sport PS2 ZP
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 72 (est.)≈ 75 (est.)
    Reviews found online7378

    g-Force COMP-2 A/S: 60% × 71.5 (est.) + 40% × 72.9 = 72

    Pilot Sport PS2 ZP: 60% × 74.5 (est.) + 40% × 78.2 = 76

    No road tests of wet for g-Force COMP-2 A/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

    No road tests of wet for Pilot Sport PS2 ZP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 65

    Snow

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    Sourceg-Force COMP-2 A/SPilot Sport PS2 ZP
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)–
    Reviews found online61–

    g-Force COMP-2 A/S: 60% × 67 (est.) + 40% × 61.1 = 65

    No road tests of snow for g-Force COMP-2 A/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

  4. 69

    Comfort

    Pilot Sport PS2 ZP +1
    70
    Why this score
    Sourceg-Force COMP-2 A/SPilot Sport PS2 ZP
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online6870

    g-Force COMP-2 A/S: 60% × 68.9 (est.) + 40% × 68 = 69

    Pilot Sport PS2 ZP: 60% × 69.3 (est.) + 40% × 70.1 = 70

    No road tests of comfort for g-Force COMP-2 A/S or Pilot Sport PS2 ZP. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 67

    Noise

    Pilot Sport PS2 ZP +2
    69
    Why this score
    Sourceg-Force COMP-2 A/SPilot Sport PS2 ZP
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online6771

    g-Force COMP-2 A/S: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 67.1 = 67

    Pilot Sport PS2 ZP: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 70.5 = 69

    No road tests of noise for g-Force COMP-2 A/S or Pilot Sport PS2 ZP. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 70

    Treadwear

    g-Force COMP-2 A/S +5
    65
    Why this score
    Sourceg-Force COMP-2 A/SPilot Sport PS2 ZP
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests76≈ 65 (est.)
    Reviews found online6264

    g-Force COMP-2 A/S: 60% × 75.5 + 40% × 61.6 = 70

    Pilot Sport PS2 ZP: 60% × 65.2 (est.) + 40% × 64.2 = 65

    No road tests of treadwear for Pilot Sport PS2 ZP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 72

    Handling (owners)

    Pilot Sport PS2 ZP +5
    77
    Why this score
    Sourceg-Force COMP-2 A/SPilot Sport PS2 ZP
    Reviews found online7277
Scores at a glance
CategoryBFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/SMichelin Pilot Sport PS2 ZP
Relative Score 71 73
Dry 72 75
Wet 72 76
Snow 65 –
Comfort 69 70
Noise 67 69
Treadwear 70 65
Handling (owners) 72 77

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

g-Force COMP-2 A/S

Pilot Sport PS2 ZP

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A g-Force COMP-2 A/S

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

Tire B Pilot Sport PS2 ZP

Pros

  • Exceptional dry and wet grip with a glued-to-the-road feel
  • Improved ride comfort and lower cabin noise compared to standard run-flats
  • Predictable handling with gentle breakaway characteristics near limits

Cons

  • Stiff or rock-hard ride quality when kept at recommended manufacturer pressures
  • Softer sidewalls can introduce a spongy or wobbly feel during rapid direction changes on certain vehicles
  • Frustrating warranty terms for staggered setups
All owner themes in the Pilot Sport PS2 ZP review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S B · Michelin Pilot Sport PS2 ZP
CategoryUltra High Performance All Season tireSummer Max Performance tires
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Tread depth9 - 10/32″—
UTQG400 AA A—
Treadwear warranty45,000 mi—
SidewallBlack Side Wall—
Max pressure50 - 51 psi—

Which one should you actually buy?

BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S

Michelin Pilot Sport PS2 ZP

Narrow edge: Michelin Pilot Sport PS2 ZP — better wet and dry. Pick the BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S if treadwear matters most to you. BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S rests on little evidence so far (1 test, 1 review), so read this result as provisional. Michelin Pilot Sport PS2 ZP rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 12 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S scores 70 vs 65 on treadwear.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Michelin Pilot Sport PS2 ZP scores 76 vs 72 on wet.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Michelin Pilot Sport PS2 ZP scores 75 vs 72 on dry.

Tire A · BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Michelin Pilot Sport PS2 ZP
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

g-Force COMP-2 A/S or Pilot Sport PS2 ZP?

Which is better in the wet, g-Force COMP-2 A/S or Pilot Sport PS2 ZP?

Michelin Pilot Sport PS2 ZP, 76 vs 72 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, g-Force COMP-2 A/S or Pilot Sport PS2 ZP?

Michelin Pilot Sport PS2 ZP, 75 vs 72 on our dry score.

Which is quieter, g-Force COMP-2 A/S or Pilot Sport PS2 ZP?

Neither, by our numbers: 67 vs 69 on the noise score, within 3 points.

Which is more comfortable, g-Force COMP-2 A/S or Pilot Sport PS2 ZP?

Neither, by our numbers: 69 vs 70 on the comfort score, within 3 points.

Which lasts longer, g-Force COMP-2 A/S or Pilot Sport PS2 ZP?

BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S, 70 vs 65 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology