Nexen N FERA SUR4 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S vs Nexen N FERA SUR4 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 1 + 0 road tests and 1 + 6 owner reviews. How we score

g-Force COMP-2 A/S is ahead, 71–62

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S

g-Force COMP-2 A/S

Ultra High Performance All Season tire

Provisional

Tests – · 1 test Owners 68 · 1 review

Best test result: #2 of 19 in 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance All-Season Tires (tested tread life (miles))

Nexen N FERA SUR4
Tire BNexen

N FERA SUR4

Summer

Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 57 · 6 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 72

    Dry

    g-Force COMP-2 A/S +1
    71
    Why this score
    Sourceg-Force COMP-2 A/SN FERA SUR4
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 70 (est.)≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online7473

    g-Force COMP-2 A/S: 60% × 70.1 (est.) + 40% × 73.7 = 72

    N FERA SUR4: 60% × 69.9 (est.) + 40% × 73.2 = 71

    No road tests of dry for g-Force COMP-2 A/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

    No road tests of dry for N FERA SUR4. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 72

    Wet

    g-Force COMP-2 A/S +17
    55
    Why this score
    Sourceg-Force COMP-2 A/SN FERA SUR4
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 72 (est.)≈ 59 (est.)
    Reviews found online7350

    g-Force COMP-2 A/S: 60% × 71.5 (est.) + 40% × 72.9 = 72

    N FERA SUR4: 60% × 58.8 (est.) + 40% × 50.1 = 55

    No road tests of wet for g-Force COMP-2 A/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

    No road tests of wet for N FERA SUR4. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 65

    Snow

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    Sourceg-Force COMP-2 A/SN FERA SUR4
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)–
    Reviews found online61–

    g-Force COMP-2 A/S: 60% × 67 (est.) + 40% × 61.1 = 65

    No road tests of snow for g-Force COMP-2 A/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

  4. 69

    Comfort

    g-Force COMP-2 A/S +9
    60
    Why this score
    Sourceg-Force COMP-2 A/SN FERA SUR4
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online6851

    g-Force COMP-2 A/S: 60% × 68.9 (est.) + 40% × 68 = 69

    N FERA SUR4: 60% × 65.9 (est.) + 40% × 50.6 = 60

    No road tests of comfort for g-Force COMP-2 A/S or N FERA SUR4. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 67

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    Sourceg-Force COMP-2 A/SN FERA SUR4
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)–
    Reviews found online67–

    g-Force COMP-2 A/S: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 67.1 = 67

    No road tests of noise for g-Force COMP-2 A/S. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 70

    Treadwear

    g-Force COMP-2 A/S +15
    55
    Why this score
    Sourceg-Force COMP-2 A/SN FERA SUR4
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests76≈ 60 (est.)
    Reviews found online6247

    g-Force COMP-2 A/S: 60% × 75.5 + 40% × 61.6 = 70

    N FERA SUR4: 60% × 59.8 (est.) + 40% × 46.7 = 55

    No road tests of treadwear for N FERA SUR4. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 72

    Handling (owners)

    g-Force COMP-2 A/S +1
    71
    Why this score
    Sourceg-Force COMP-2 A/SN FERA SUR4
    Reviews found online7271
Scores at a glance
BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S vs Nexen N FERA SUR4: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryBFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/SNexen N FERA SUR4
Relative Score 71 62
Dry 72 71
Wet 72 55
Snow 65 –
Comfort 69 60
Noise 67 –
Treadwear 70 55
Handling (owners) 72 71

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

g-Force COMP-2 A/S

N FERA SUR4

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A g-Force COMP-2 A/S

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

Tire B N FERA SUR4

Pros

  • Exceptional dry grip and track-day performance
  • Precise steering feedback and predictable handling
  • Cost-effective alternative to more expensive track tires

Cons

  • High level of road noise
  • Poor wet-weather performance and dangerous hydroplaning tendencies in heavy rain
  • Fast tread wear
All owner themes in the N FERA SUR4 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S B · Nexen N FERA SUR4
CategoryUltra High Performance All Season tireSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Tread depth9 - 10/32″—
UTQG400 AA A—
Treadwear warranty45,000 mi—
SidewallBlack Side Wall—
Max pressure50 - 51 psi—

Which one should you actually buy?

BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S

Nexen N FERA SUR4

Winner: BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S — better wet, treadwear and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score. BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S rests on little evidence so far (1 test, 1 review), so read this result as provisional. Nexen N FERA SUR4 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 6 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S scores 72 vs 55 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S scores 70 vs 55 on treadwear.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S scores 69 vs 60 on comfort.

Tire A · BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S
Tire B · Nexen N FERA SUR4

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

g-Force COMP-2 A/S or N FERA SUR4?

Which is better in the wet, g-Force COMP-2 A/S or N FERA SUR4?

BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S, 72 vs 55 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, g-Force COMP-2 A/S or N FERA SUR4?

Neither, by our numbers: 72 vs 71 on the dry score, within 3 points.

Which is more comfortable, g-Force COMP-2 A/S or N FERA SUR4?

BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S, 69 vs 60 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, g-Force COMP-2 A/S or N FERA SUR4?

BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S, 70 vs 55 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology