Tests – · 1 test Owners 67 · 1 review
Best test result: #2 of 19 in 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance All-Season Tires (tested tread life (miles))
Head-to-head
Updated
BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S vs Yokohama Advan Sport AS — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 1 + 2 road tests and 1 + 15 owner reviews. How we score
g-Force COMP-2 A/S is ahead, 70–61
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 61 · 2 tests Owners 60 · 15 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 19 in 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance All-Season Tires (tested tread life (miles))
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
70
Dry
g-Force COMP-2 A/S +2149Why this score
Source g-Force COMP-2 A/S Advan Sport AS Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 69 (est.) 42 Reviews found online 71 60 g-Force COMP-2 A/S: 60% × 69.1 (est.) + 40% × 70.8 = 70
Advan Sport AS: 60% × 41.9 + 40% × 59.9 = 49
No road tests of dry for g-Force COMP-2 A/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
71
Wet
g-Force COMP-2 A/S +1160Why this score
Source g-Force COMP-2 A/S Advan Sport AS Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 71 (est.) 58 Reviews found online 71 64 g-Force COMP-2 A/S: 60% × 70.9 (est.) + 40% × 71.1 = 71
Advan Sport AS: 60% × 57.6 + 40% × 64.2 = 60
No road tests of wet for g-Force COMP-2 A/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
–
Snow
No comparison57Why this score
Source g-Force COMP-2 A/S Advan Sport AS Professional tests (TWG score) – ≈ 63 (est.) Reviews found online – 47 Advan Sport AS: 60% × 63.1 (est.) + 40% × 47.4 = 57
No road tests of snow for Advan Sport AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
67
Comfort
g-Force COMP-2 A/S +463Why this score
Source g-Force COMP-2 A/S Advan Sport AS Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 68 (est.) 62 Reviews found online 66 64 g-Force COMP-2 A/S: 40% × 68.2 (est.) + 60% × 66.4 = 67
Advan Sport AS: 40% × 61.7 + 60% × 63.8 = 63
No road tests of comfort for g-Force COMP-2 A/S. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
–
Noise
No comparison69Why this score
Source g-Force COMP-2 A/S Advan Sport AS Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests – 72 Reviews found online – 63 Advan Sport AS: 60% × 72.4 + 40% × 63.1 = 69
-
70
Treadwear
Advan Sport AS +373Why this score
Source g-Force COMP-2 A/S Advan Sport AS Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 1 tests 77 81 Reviews found online 60 60 Tested Tread Life (Miles) (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–1 87% 100% g-Force COMP-2 A/S: 60% × 77 + 40% × 59.7 = 70
Advan Sport AS: 60% × 80.9 + 40% × 60 = 73
-
69
Handling (owners)
g-Force COMP-2 A/S +762Why this score
Source g-Force COMP-2 A/S Advan Sport AS Reviews found online 69 62
Scores at a glance
| Category | BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S | Yokohama Advan Sport AS |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 70 | 61 |
| Dry | 70 | 49 |
| Wet | 71 | 60 |
| Snow | – | 57 |
| Comfort | 67 | 63 |
| Noise | – | 69 |
| Treadwear | 70 | 73 |
| Handling (owners) | 69 | 62 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
70
/ 100
g-Force COMP-2 A/S
61
/ 100
Advan Sport AS
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
In the overall rankings of 1 tests that ran both, BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S finished ahead 1 times and Yokohama Advan Sport AS 0 times.
| Discipline | Category | g-Force COMP-2 A/S | Advan Sport AS | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tested Tread Life (Miles) | Treadwear | 87% | 100% | −13.3 | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance All-Season Tires · 225/40R18 |
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #4/19 | #9/19 | – | 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance All-Season Tires · 225/40R18 |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A g-Force COMP-2 A/S
Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.
Tire B Advan Sport AS
Pros
- Quiet and comfortable highway ride
- Good overall traction in wet and dry conditions
- Excellent value for the money compared to premium competitors
Cons
- Potential road force balancing issues reported by some users
- Some enthusiasts feel ultimate performance capability is lacking
- Tread life remains largely unproven in early-mileage reviews
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S | B · Yokohama Advan Sport AS |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Ultra High Performance All Season tire | All-Season tire |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Tread depth | 9 - 10/32″ | 11/32″ |
| UTQG | 400 AA A | 440 A A |
| Treadwear warranty | 45,000 mi | 50,000 mi |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | 50 - 51 psi | 50 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
70
/ 100
BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S
61
/ 100
Yokohama Advan Sport AS
Winner: BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S — better dry, wet and handling. Pick the Yokohama Advan Sport AS if treadwear matters most to you. BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S rests on little evidence so far (1 test, 1 review), so read this result as provisional.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S scores 70 vs 49 on dry.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S scores 71 vs 60 on wet.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S scores 69 vs 62 on handling.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S scores 67 vs 63 on comfort.
Tire A · BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S
Tire B · Yokohama Advan Sport AS
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
g-Force COMP-2 A/S or Advan Sport AS?
Which is better in the wet, g-Force COMP-2 A/S or Advan Sport AS?
BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S, 71 vs 60 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, g-Force COMP-2 A/S or Advan Sport AS?
BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S, 70 vs 49 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, g-Force COMP-2 A/S or Advan Sport AS?
BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S, 67 vs 63 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, g-Force COMP-2 A/S or Advan Sport AS?
Yokohama Advan Sport AS, 73 vs 70 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology