Tests – · none yet Owners – · 1 review (needs 5)
BFGoodrich g-Force R1 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
BFGoodrich g-Force R1 vs Toyo R1R — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 1 + 33 owner reviews. How we score
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
–
Dry
No comparison80Why this score
Source g-Force R1 R1R Professional tests (TWG score) – ≈ 76 (est.) Reviews found online – 86 R1R: 60% × 75.6 (est.) + 40% × 85.9 = 80
No road tests of dry for R1R. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
–
Wet
No comparison77Why this score
Source g-Force R1 R1R Professional tests (TWG score) – ≈ 76 (est.) Reviews found online – 80 R1R: 60% × 75.7 (est.) + 40% × 79.6 = 77
No road tests of wet for R1R. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
–
Comfort
No comparison69Why this score
Source g-Force R1 R1R Professional tests (TWG score) – ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online – 68 R1R: 40% × 69 (est.) + 60% × 68.3 = 69
No road tests of comfort for R1R. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
–
Treadwear
No comparison59Why this score
Source g-Force R1 R1R Professional tests (TWG score) – ≈ 62 (est.) Reviews found online – 54 R1R: 60% × 62 (est.) + 40% × 54.3 = 59
No road tests of treadwear for R1R. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
-
–
Handling (owners)
No comparison83Why this score
Source g-Force R1 R1R Reviews found online – 83
Scores at a glance
| Category | BFGoodrich g-Force R1 | Toyo R1R |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | – | 75 |
| Dry | – | 80 |
| Wet | – | 77 |
| Comfort | – | 69 |
| Treadwear | – | 59 |
| Handling (owners) | – | 83 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
g-Force R1
R1R
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A g-Force R1
Pros
- Superior cornering stability and reduced understeer
- High levels of mechanical grip during braking and cornering
- Predictable and gradual breakaway characteristics
Cons
- Susceptible to overheating when pushed at extreme limits (9+/10 intensity)
- Limited longevity typical of dedicated track-focused rubber
Tire B R1R
Pros
- Exceptional dry grip and cornering stability
- Predictable handling and communicative steering feedback
- Strong wet-weather performance for a performance-oriented tire
Cons
- Rapid tread wear due to soft compound
- Prone to overheating and 'greasy' performance during prolonged track use
- Increased road noise compared to standard street tires
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · BFGoodrich g-Force R1 | B · Toyo R1R |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Trackday and Competition Summer tire | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Which one should you actually buy?
BFGoodrich g-Force R1
Toyo R1R
Only Toyo R1R has enough test and review data for a Relative Score, so there is no head-to-head winner yet.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology