Tests 65 · 1 test Owners 61 · 80 reviews
Best test result: #3 of 7 in 2025 Tire Rack Extreme Performance Track Tyre Test (dry handling long run)
Head-to-head
Updated
BFGoodrich G Force Rival S 1.5 vs Yokohama ADVAN A052 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 1 + 5 road tests and 80 + 213 owner reviews. How we score
ADVAN A052 is ahead, 72–64
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 76 · 5 tests Owners 68 · 213 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 7 in 2025 Tire Rack Extreme Performance Track Tyre Test (dry handling (tester's mark))
“Staggered BBSs Need Tires I have a set of BBS wheels that i have been restoring for my 89 944 NA. I am trying to figure out what tires to get and am running into a bit of trouble. The set of BBSs are 15in staggered. The front are 8in wide and the rear are 9in wide. When i had purchased these wheels they had 215/60R15s all around. Would this be a good fitment? I am hoping the rear will not look stretched. As i was researching staggered tires i ran into problems finding a matching set in the sizes 225 50R15 and 205 55R15. A local shop helped me find these for the front Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 (205 55R15) and these for the rear Yokohama ADVAN A052 (225 50R15). Im concerned to get these due to the tread pattern being drastically different. Another shop has Kumho Ecsta 4x KU22 picked out for the front. I would like to have performance summer tires that do not break the bank. If i were to do 215/60R15s all around i was looking at Falken Sincera SN250 A/S (which are not performance) or Vredestein Sprint Classic which i am not sure of. I am a bit at a loss here and would greatly appreciate any advice or help selecting tires as this is not something i am comfortable with given the lack of options at this wheel size.”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
68
Dry
ADVAN A052 +1280Why this score
Source G Force Rival S 1.5 ADVAN A052 Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 5 tests 61 74 Reviews found online 78 90 Dry Braking (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–1 93% 98% Dry Handling (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–0 100% 99% Dry Handling Long Run (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–0 100% 99% Dry Handling (tester's mark) (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–1 91% 100% G Force Rival S 1.5: 60% × 61.1 + 40% × 77.8 = 68
ADVAN A052: 60% × 73.6 + 40% × 89.9 = 80
-
61
Wet
ADVAN A052 +1273Why this score
Source G Force Rival S 1.5 ADVAN A052 Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 4 tests 69 78 Reviews found online 48 67 Wet Handling (tester's mark) (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–1 81% 91% Wet Braking (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–0 91% 90% Wet Handling (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–1 96% 100% G Force Rival S 1.5: 60% × 69.4 + 40% × 48 = 61
ADVAN A052: 60% × 77.8 + 40% × 67 = 73
-
–
Snow
No comparison73Why this score
Source G Force Rival S 1.5 ADVAN A052 Professional tests (TWG score) – ≈ 72 (est.) Reviews found online – 74 ADVAN A052: 60% × 71.6 (est.) + 40% × 73.9 = 73
No road tests of snow for ADVAN A052. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
58
Comfort
ADVAN A052 +967Why this score
Source G Force Rival S 1.5 ADVAN A052 Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 1 tests 66 74 Reviews found online 54 63 Comfort (tester's mark) (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–1 92% 100% G Force Rival S 1.5: 40% × 65.7 + 60% × 53.6 = 58
ADVAN A052: 40% × 74.1 + 60% × 62.6 = 67
-
64
Noise
ADVAN A052 +1377Why this score
Source G Force Rival S 1.5 ADVAN A052 Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 1 tests 62 77 Reviews found online ≈ 66 (est.) 77 Noise (tester's mark) (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–1 80% 100% G Force Rival S 1.5: 60% × 62.4 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 64
ADVAN A052: 60% × 76.8 + 40% × 76.5 = 77
No owner ratings of noise for G Force Rival S 1.5. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
-
60
Treadwear
G Force Rival S 1.5 +1050Why this score
Source G Force Rival S 1.5 ADVAN A052 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 63 (est.) ≈ 57 (est.) Reviews found online 55 40 G Force Rival S 1.5: 60% × 62.5 (est.) + 40% × 55.4 = 60
ADVAN A052: 60% × 56.8 (est.) + 40% × 39.5 = 50
No road tests of treadwear for G Force Rival S 1.5. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for ADVAN A052. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
74
Handling (owners)
ADVAN A052 +1084Why this score
Source G Force Rival S 1.5 ADVAN A052 Reviews found online 74 84
Scores at a glance
| Category | BFGoodrich G Force Rival S 1.5 | Yokohama ADVAN A052 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 64 | 72 |
| Dry | 68 | 80 |
| Wet | 61 | 73 |
| Snow | – | 73 |
| Comfort | 58 | 67 |
| Noise | 64 | 77 |
| Treadwear | 60 | 50 |
| Handling (owners) | 74 | 84 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
64
/ 100
G Force Rival S 1.5
72
/ 100
ADVAN A052
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
In the overall rankings of 1 tests that ran both, BFGoodrich G Force Rival S 1.5 finished ahead 1 times and Yokohama ADVAN A052 0 times.
| Discipline | Category | G Force Rival S 1.5 | ADVAN A052 | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Braking | Dry | 93% | 98% | −4.7 | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2025 Tire Rack Extreme Performance Track Tyre Test · 275/35 R18 |
| Dry Handling | Dry | 100% | 99% | +0.5 | 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2025 Tire Rack Extreme Performance Track Tyre Test · 275/35 R18 |
| Dry Handling (tester's mark) | Dry | 91% | 100% | −8.6 | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2025 Tire Rack Extreme Performance Track Tyre Test · 275/35 R18 |
| Dry Handling Long Run | Dry | 100% | 99% | +0.7 | 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2025 Tire Rack Extreme Performance Track Tyre Test · 275/35 R18 |
| Wet Braking | Wet | 91% | 90% | +1.3 | 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2025 Tire Rack Extreme Performance Track Tyre Test · 275/35 R18 |
| Wet Handling | Wet | 96% | 100% | −3.4 | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2025 Tire Rack Extreme Performance Track Tyre Test · 275/35 R18 |
| Wet Handling (tester's mark) | Wet | 81% | 91% | −9.3 | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2025 Tire Rack Extreme Performance Track Tyre Test · 275/35 R18 |
| Comfort (tester's mark) | Comfort | 92% | 100% | −8.3 | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2025 Tire Rack Extreme Performance Track Tyre Test · 275/35 R18 |
| Noise (tester's mark) | Noise | 80% | 100% | −20.0 | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2025 Tire Rack Extreme Performance Track Tyre Test · 275/35 R18 |
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #3/7 | #5/7 | – | 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2025 Tire Rack Extreme Performance Track Tyre Test · 275/35 R18 |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A G Force Rival S 1.5
Pros
- Exceptional dry traction and lateral grip
- Rapid warm-up, making it ideal for short-duration autocross
- Superior tread life and durability compared to other 200TW competitors
Cons
- Performance degrades significantly in wet or cold conditions
- Tendency to overheat and lose grip ('grease up') during long track sessions
- Increased road noise and tendency to tramline on public roads
Tire B ADVAN A052
Pros
- Class-leading dry grip and traction, often compared to dedicated racing slicks.
- Rapid warm-up time, providing peak performance almost immediately.
- Surprisingly high levels of wet-weather traction and hydroplaning resistance for a performance tire.
Cons
- Rapid tread wear, especially when used on heavy vehicles or without aggressive camber settings.
- Tendency to 'grease up' or lose performance during long, high-intensity track sessions.
- Soft sidewall construction can lead to vague steering feel or 'sponginess' compared to stiffer competitors.
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Tire A
BFGoodrich G Force Rival S 1.5
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Tire B
Positive
Yokohama ADVAN A052
The community regards the Yokohama ADVAN A052 as a top-tier, high-performance competition tire that offers exceptional dry grip and competitive edge in autocross and track settings. Users frequently compare them favorably against other extreme performance tires like the Bridgestone RE-71R/RE-71RS, though questions remain regarding their longevity for long-distance road trips.
r/tires
·2 upvotes ·2023-07-04
“Long trip with Advans A052? I'm planning a trip to the Nürburgring to attend a trackday this October. The problem is that I live 1300 km away, so the tyres should be able to cope with that, some 20 laps at medium-fast pace at the Nordschleife, and the drive back home. Are the Advan A052 tyres way to soft for such a long trip? Will they last? Wouldn't it be wiser to settle for a more conservative set of Michelins PS4? The car is a 1986 Porsche 911 Carrera, 1210 kg... Read more”
northamericanmotoring.com
“I went with Yokohama ADVAN A052 225/45/17s for AUTOx They are more expensive but they are definitely lighter than the N2s...20.6#s vs ~25#s from what I found on the internet.”
r/tires
·9 upvotes ·2020-01-18
“Yokohama ADVAN A052 315/30R18 and 265/35R18 - BEEFY!”
Top themes
#exceptional dry grip#autocross and track performance#tire longevity and wear#comparison with bridgestone#tire sizing and fitment
Based on 12 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · BFGoodrich G Force Rival S 1.5 | B · Yokohama ADVAN A052 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | — | 61 |
| Rim diameters | — | 13″ – 20″ |
| Tread depth | — | 7/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 200 A A |
| Sidewall | — | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | — | 51 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
64
/ 100
BFGoodrich G Force Rival S 1.5
72
/ 100
Yokohama ADVAN A052
Winner: Yokohama ADVAN A052 — better noise, dry and wet. Pick the BFGoodrich G Force Rival S 1.5 if treadwear matters most to you.
Pick tire B
You want a quieter cabin
Yokohama ADVAN A052 scores 77 vs 64 on noise.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Yokohama ADVAN A052 scores 80 vs 68 on dry.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Yokohama ADVAN A052 scores 73 vs 61 on wet.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
BFGoodrich G Force Rival S 1.5 scores 60 vs 50 on treadwear.
Tire A · BFGoodrich G Force Rival S 1.5
Tire B · Yokohama ADVAN A052
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
G Force Rival S 1.5 or ADVAN A052?
Which is better in the wet, G Force Rival S 1.5 or ADVAN A052?
Yokohama ADVAN A052, 73 vs 61 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, G Force Rival S 1.5 or ADVAN A052?
Yokohama ADVAN A052, 80 vs 68 on our dry score.
Which is quieter, G Force Rival S 1.5 or ADVAN A052?
Yokohama ADVAN A052, 77 vs 64 on our noise score.
Which is more comfortable, G Force Rival S 1.5 or ADVAN A052?
Yokohama ADVAN A052, 67 vs 58 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, G Force Rival S 1.5 or ADVAN A052?
BFGoodrich G Force Rival S 1.5, 60 vs 50 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology